Britain’s royal family on Saturday condemned the “greed” of an Irish newspaper that published topless photographs of Prince William’s wife Catherine, and warned an Italian magazine not to follow suit.
The grainy images of Catherine sunbathing in her bikini bottoms appeared in Saturday’s Irish Daily Star, a fresh blow to the royals a day after they launched legal action against the French magazine that first printed them.
“There can be no motivation for this action other than greed,” said a spokeswoman for Catherine and her husband, the second-in-line to the British throne.
The two media groups that jointly own the Irish Daily Star also condemned the decision to run the shots, which were taken with a long lens while the couple, both 30, were holidaying at a private chateau in the south of France.
Britain’s Northern and Shell group said it was taking “immediate steps” to shut down the joint venture with Dublin-based publisher Independent News and Media which operates the Irish Daily Star.
“The decision to publish these pictures has no justification whatever and Northern and Shell condemns it in the strongest possible terms,” said the company’s chairman Richard Desmond.
Independent News and Media said it had no prior knowledge of the decision, which it described as “regrettable and in poor taste”.
The Irish Daily Star’s editor Mike O’Kane admitted that he was running the pictures to sell more papers, and said he had treated Catherine as he would any other celebrity.
“The duchess would be no different to any other celeb pics we would get in, for example Rihanna or Lady Gaga,” he told the BBC.
“She’s not the future queen of Ireland so really the only place this is causing fury seems to be in the UK.”
The photos would not appear in the British or Northern Irish editions of the Daily Star, he added.
The royal family also warned Italian gossip magazine Chi on Saturday that “unjustifiable upset” would be heaped upon Catherine if it went ahead with plans to print the photos.
Apparently undeterred by the launch of legal action against French magazine Closer, which first ran the pictures, Chi said on Friday that it would print 26 pages of them in a special edition on Monday.
The magazine’s editor Alfonso Signorini said the pictures were “a scoop” he could not afford to miss.
“If I wasn’t capable of recognising the true value of a scoop I would do better to go and sell artichokes at the market,” he told the ANSA news agency.
Both Chi and Closer are part of the media empire of former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi.
A palace spokeswoman declined to comment on whether the royal family was launching legal action against either Chi or the Irish Daily Star.
“All proportionate responses will be kept under review,” she said.
Closer magazine confirmed to AFP that there would be a hearing on the complaint on Monday at a court in Nanterre, north-west Paris.
William and Catherine, who are currently in Malaysia as part of a tour to mark Queen Elizabeth II’s sixtieth year on the throne, put on a brave face for the cameras on Saturday during a visit to a Borneo jungle.
The prince is said to be furious over the images, which drew comparisons with press harassment of his mother Diana who died in a Paris car crash in 1997 pursued by paparazzi.
He is believed to blame the press photographers for his mother’s death.
In a strongly worded statement on Friday, palace officials said the pictures were a “grotesque” breach of privacy.
“The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, and all the more upsetting to The Duke and Duchess for being so,” they said.
Closer has insisted it has no regrets about printing the pictures.
This is the second furore over scantily-clad British royals in a month, after nude pictures of William’s brother Harry, frolicking with a mystery woman in a Las Vegas hotel suite, went viral on the Internet.
Watch Devin Nunes freak out and eject reporters when asked about phone calls with Lev Parnas
Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) lost it over the weekend when he was asked about his phone calls with Rudy Giuliani's associate Lev Parnas, who was recently indicted.
Nunes was at a Republican Party fundraiser in New York City when two Intercept reporters asked about the impeachment probe. Recent phone records subpoenaed by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that Nunes had multiple conversations with Giuliani and with Parnas.
Trump supporters lose their minds when church shows Nativity scene in immigrant cages
MAGA supporters are losing their minds after a photo of the Nativity scene at Claremont United Methodist Church was posted to Facebook.
The scene depicts Mary, Joseph, and the baby Jesus separated and put in their own cages, a reference to the families separated at the U.S.-Mexico border. Inside the church, the family is shown as reunited.
Senior minister Karen Clark Ristine shared the image on Facebook with the message hoping that everyone in the United States could see the photo and read the story for Christmas.
"The theological statement posted with the nativity: In a time in our country when refugee families seek asylum at our borders and are unwillingly separated from one another, we consider the most well-known refugee family in the world," she wrote. "Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, the Holy Family. Shortly after the birth of Jesus, Joseph and Mary were forced to flee with their young son from Nazareth to Egypt to escape King Herod, a tyrant. They feared persecution and death."
Columnist nails Republicans for only caring about Hunter Biden now that his father is running for president
One of the critical questions that must be answered by Republicans, according to one Washington Post columnist, is why they didn't care about Hunter Biden's position at Burisma for so many years.
In a Sunday piece, James Downie asked why Republicans didn't do anything about Hunter Biden five years ago when it was first revealed that vice president's son was on the board of a Ukraine energy company. The House and the Senate were being run by Republicans until this year. They haven't had problems with other partisan investigations against high-profile leaders. There were ten investigations into the Benghazi attacks, three hearings, 29 witnesses, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified for 11 hours. Yet, it was only after Joe Biden announced he was running against President Donald Trump that Republicans discovered an issue.