Quantcast
Connect with us

Skin-lightening creams faces backlash in west Africa

Published

on

New advert for ‘all white’ product promising extreme skin-whitening provokes public outrage and calls for ban

It is a familiar formula for persuading women to buy a new beauty product: plaster billboards of a beautiful model in the capital city, accompanied by a catchy slogan written in the language of the ordinary woman.

But when new adverts for skin cream “Khess Petch” – a skin lightening cream whose name means “all white” – appeared in Senegal, they had the exact opposite effect. The ads, which boasts extreme skin-whitening after 15 days, complete with dramatic before and after shots, provoked mass public outrage and calls for the government to introduce an industry-wide ban.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are used to seeing adverts for skin lightening, but when we first saw these adverts for Khess Petch we were really scandalised. We decided to act,” said Aisha Deme, manager of an online events website in the Senegalese capital, Dakar.

“Society is constantly telling us that fair-skinned women are beautiful – in the media, on TV – and Senegalese women have started to believe it,” Deme added. “So we want to show that dark-skinned women are really beautiful, and that natural black skin should be celebrated.”

Deme now co-ordinates a campaign called Ñuul Kukk – which means “pitch black” in local language Wolof – and has attracted thousands of supporters on Facebook and high-profile friends, including the actor Awa Sene Sarr and rapper Awadi.

Senegal’s health minister, Eva Marie Coll Seck, has also met the group, and expressed her “outrage” about the adverts. But , fuelled by the prevalence of fair-skinned images in films, magazines and advertising.

“Skin complexion matters. [Many women believe that] women with fair skin are more successful, women with fair skin are the ones who stand out,” said Dr Fatou Fall, a dermatologist from the institute of social hygiene in Dakar.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dermatologists say that many of the products include steroids corticosteroid and clobetasol propionate, a cream which should be used for the treatment of severe skin inflammation and prescribed by health professionals, and hydroquinone a potentially carcinogenic chemical which limits melanin production in the skin, and is banned in the EU.

Although Senegalese law includes controls over the creams, including a ban on creams with more than 2% corticosteroid, the laws are poorly enforced, with products with much higher levels freely available in stalls and marketplaces in Dakar.

Critics say that the cost of Khess Petch – at 1,000 CFA francs a tub – less than £2 – deliberately targets the products at women who are unaware of the risks.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There are expensive face-lightening creams which are less dangerous, but products like Khess Petch are very cheap and very dangerous – they are deliberately targeted at women in the villages and the poor urban areas,” said Deme. “Even when they discover the side-effects and want to stop using the creams, they find they cannot stop. It’s only when you stop that the skin changes and begins to become completely burned.”

“When women who use these creams stop, they look horrible,” said Fall. “They actually start looking more black, all the side effects manifest at the same time, which they just can’t accept.”

ADVERTISEMENT

© Guardian News and Media 2012


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Commentary

Two quotes that defined the first day of public impeachment hearings

Published

on

Editor’s note: Wednesday was the first day of public hearings in the House impeachment inquiry. Two career diplomats – William B. Taylor Jr., acting ambassador to Ukraine, and George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs – gave testimony to the House Intelligence Committee. Two scholars listened, and each picked one quote to analyze.

Continue Reading

CNN

Lindsey Graham clings to new Trump ‘hearsay’ defense: Impeachment ‘is going to destroy the presidency over time’

Published

on

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) argued that the impeachment of President Donald Trump should not go forward because it would "destroy the presidency over time."

Reporters pressed Graham on Thursday about what he might do to stop the impeachment proceedings.

"There’s no quid pro quo," Graham ranted. "Nothing happened here. We’re not going to impeach this president over this. We’re not going to legitimize a hearing where you can only call Democratic witnesses. It’s over. It’s done for me."

According to the South Carolina Republican, impeachment is not a valid remedy for the president's misdeeds because it was initiated with so-called hearsay evidence.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Internet disgusted after Erdo?an makes Trump and GOP senators watch propaganda video in the Oval Office

Published

on

On Thursday, Axios reported that during a reception at the Oval Office, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdo?an — who has come under international scrutiny for his brutal treatment of Kurdish freedom fighters — whipped out his iPad and made President Donald Trump and several GOP senators watch a video describing Kurds as terrorists.

Commenters on social media were quick to excoriate the president for allowing a notorious strongman to bring propaganda into the White House and make U.S. officials watch it on his personal tablet:

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image