Noted atheist and evolutionary theorist Richard Dawkins stirred up controversy again by saying that it would be immoral for a mother not to abort a fetus if she knew that it had Down syndrome.


The exchange began yesterday morning as Dawkins and some of his Twitter followers were discussing the case of a woman in Ireland who was denied an abortion at 8 weeks and forced by local authorities to undergo a caesarean section 17 weeks later after she threatened to go on a hunger strike.

As that conversation progressed, one of his followers asked him a hypothetical question, which he responded to:

He was quickly attacked by those who know people with Down syndrome who are happy, productive members of society; and then criticized more abstractly by those who claim that he was advocating eugenics. Dawkins returned to Twitter late last night to insist that he was advocating nothing of the sort:

He then answered critics who claimed he was telling women what to do if their fetus was detected to have Down syndrome:

Dawkins noted that the majority of women in the United Kingdom and United States who are told that their child will have Down Syndrome do, in fact, abort the fetus:

He also noted that many of those attacking him were doing so emotionally instead of logically:

Dawkins was also adamant that he was not imploring an actual woman to abort an actual fetus, merely responding to a hypothetical scenario in a rational way:

He reiterated that his position is "civilised" not because people with Down syndrome are inhuman, but because all fetuses are:

Raw Story spoke to Michael Bérubé, the former president of the Modern Language Association whose son Jamie was born with Down syndrome, about Dawkins' comments. "I think the lesson of this episode is obvious," he said. "We need to do much more rigorous prenatal screening for ignorant assholes."