Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman said in a recent interview that President Barack Obama was one of the most successful presidents in American history, topping even Ronald Reagan.
In a cover story for Rolling Stone magazine titled “In Defense of Obama,” Krugman defends Obama against critics on the right and the left.
“High office shouldn’t be about putting points on the electoral scoreboard, it should be about changing the country for the better,” Krugman wrote. “Has Obama done that? Do his achievements look likely to endure? The answer to both questions is yes.”
“People who thought Obama was going to bring a transformation of America, I thought were being naive,” Krugman told ABC News correspondent Jonathan Karl in a recent interview. “But by God, we got health reform, we got a significant financial reform. We are getting — the environmental action is not everything you would have wanted, but it’s more than anyone else has done for decades.”
Krugman said that the current president had not made nearly the same impact as Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he was ahead of Reagan.
“In the end, Reagan did not leave the structure of America’s society particularly different,” Krugman explained. “He did not in fact change the basic legacy of Lyndon Johnson and FDR.”
Franklin D. Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, and President Obama all were more successful than Reagan, according to the economist.
Krugman also admitted that Obama had a more “professorial” style than President Bill Clinton, who he described as a “gifted politician.”
“Bill Clinton enters a room, and it doesn’t matter how many people are in the room, you think he’s talking to you,” he noted. “But in fact, Bill Clinton was not a consequential president. And Obama, although clearly not the natural politician, he is a consequential president.”
National security, however, was one area that Obama could not be called a “great” president, Krugman said.
“He hasn’t done anything really stupid. And that is a big improvement over his predecessor.”
Watch the video below from ABC News’ This Week, broadcast Oct. 12, 2014.
CNN host forced to explain to Republican Rick Santorum why Trump’s attack on Democratic lawmakers was racist
During an appearance on CNN's "New Day" -- along with fellow Republican Charlie Dent (PA) -- ex-Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) received a lecture from host John Berman on why Donald Trump's tweets and attacks on four Democratic lawmakers were racist.
While Dent revealed that down-ticket Republicans running for re-election in 2020 are "terrified" that Trump's descent into overt racism as a campaign strategy may kill their chances of holding their seats, Santorum said he was disgusted with the whole spectacle while saying he didn't see the attacks as racist.
Asked about the president's attacks, Santorum tried to brush them away and blame the recipients of Trump's ire.
‘What the hell, Pete!’ Geraldo blows up on Fox & Friends host for saying ‘send her back’ chants weren’t racist
Fox News' Geraldo Rivera on Friday schooled "Fox & Friends" host Pete Hegseth when he tried to claim that President Donald Trump's racist tweets telling four Democratic women of color to "go back" to their countries weren't racist.
While discussing Trump's racist tweets, Hegseth argued that Trump wasn't being racist because he never specifically mentioned anyone's race when he told four American citizens who happened to be nonwhite to "go back" to the places they or their ancestors came from.
"He's talking about whether you love this country and appreciate it," Hegseth said. "And if you don't appreciate it, don't love it, don't want to work to make it better, you could consider going somewhere else."
New revelation in Trump’s involvement in Stormy Daniels hush money payoff is an impeachable offense: CNN panel
A CNN panel convened to discuss new evidence that shows Donald Trump was heavily involved in the plot to keep his affair with adult film actress Stormy Daniels secret before the 2016 election concluded that it is one more impeachable offense.
Speaking with hosts John Berman and Alisyn Camerota, CNN commentator Errol Louis said that the newly revealed texts messages and phone-calls between former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen and Trump aide Hope Hicks prove that the then-candidate was in the thick of it before the election.
"He did know, Errol," host Berman explained. "All the evidence is he knew. There's all these phone calls, there are the checks. There's Michael Cohen's testimony. The evidence says the president was lying to the American people."