Researchers at Yale have discovered there’s an actual scientific explanation for tears of joy.
Chances are you have found yourself crying during a moment of joy. Maybe you got misty at the last wedding you attended. Or you felt weepy watching a heart-touching scene in a movie.
It can be confusing to have a negative emotion in response to a positive feeling. But now, researchers at Yale can explain why many of us experience those seemingly contradictory emotional responses.
Oriana Aragon, the psychological scientist who led the study, says it’s our brains’ way of creating emotional balance when faced with overwhelming feelings.
“People may be restoring emotional equilibrium with these expressions,” Aragon said. “They seem to take place when people are overwhelmed with strong positive emotions, and people who do this seem to recover better from those strong emotions.”
“Dimorphous expressions”—what researchers term those oddly disparate responses to stimuli, such as weeping when we’re elated—help us keep our emotions in check when we’re flooded with feelings that might otherwise feel too intense.
Researchers also cited examples of aggressive behaviors accompanying positive feelings. For example, most of us are familiar with the sudden urge to pinch the cheek of an adorable baby, or wanting to, in the words of many participants in the study, “eat them up.”
That seeming polarity in responses to a rush of emotions is the brain’s way of keeping our emotional temperatures in the proper zone. Subjects in the study were better able to return to a neutral emotional state in a short period of time as a result of having paired seemingly conflicting emotions to certain stimuli.
The study also found that the idea held true in opposite conditions as well; for example, people who are feeling very sad may laugh or smile.
“These insights advance our understanding of how people express and control their emotions, which is importantly related to mental and physical health, the quality of relationships with others, and even how well people work together,” Aragon said.
So the next time you find yourself inexplicably giggly as you deliver bad news, or suddenly verklempt as you watch a particularly uplifting commercial, at least now you know there’s a scientific explanation.
Award-winning broadcaster Cokie Roberts dies at 75
Veteran broadcaster Cokie Roberts has died at the age of 75 due to complications from breast cancer.
Roberts joined NPR in 1978 before moving to ABC News, and she won three Emmy Awards and was inducted into the Broadcasting and Cable Hall of Fame and was cited by the American Women in Radio and Television as one of the 50 greatest women in the history of broadcasting.
"She was a true pioneer for women in journalism," said James Goldston, president of ABC News, "well-regarded for her insightful analysis of politics and policy in Washington, D.C., countless newsmaking interviews, and, notably, her unwavering support for generations of young women — and men — who would follow in her footsteps."
Here’s what it would really take to impeach Brett Kavanaugh
President Donald Trump isn’t the only Republican who some Democrats in Congress are talking about impeaching: Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts is among the Democrats who is calling for the impeachment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. But Sen. Dick Durban isn’t one of them. The Illinois Democrat has forcefully stated that trying to impeach Kavanaugh would be a waste of time for his party, and he’s right. The bar for impeaching a U.S. Supreme Court justice is incredibly high — especially when far-right Republicans, led by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a.k.a. Moscow Mitch, still have a majority in the U.S. Senate.
Naomi Klein: The climate crisis demands radical change — and paper straws are just a distraction
Renowned climate activist and author Naomi Klein says responses to the climate crisis have for too long focused on individual consumer choices rather than the collective action needed to save the planet. In a new video for The Intercept, Klein argues, “So many environmental responses have just been minor tweaks to an economy based on endless consumption — take your electric car to the drive-through for an Impossible Burger and a Coke with a paper straw. Of course it’s better than the alternative. But it’s nowhere close to the depth of change required if we hope to actually pull our planet back from the brink.” Klein joins us for the hour to discuss her new book, “On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal.”