An Oakland, California-based “Radical Brownie” group has conservatives in a furious tizzy. The 8 to 10-year-old girls study social activism and take part of their inspiration from the 60s radical group the Black Panthers.
CBS reported last week that girls in Oakland can join the Radical Brownies, founded in the wake of the Black Lives Matter protests and dedicated to the notion of equality for all people, regardless of race.
Fusion.com says that all of the girls in the troop are children of color or mixed-race and that the organization is not affiliated with the Girl Scouts of America.
The girls in the group are studying the 1960s and 70s radical black empowerment group the Black Panther Party. The Black Panthers rose to prominence as a community “self defense” organization, dedicated to avenging and protecting black lives against the purportedly racist and corrupt U.S. criminal justice system.
The group’s legacy is controversial. Some say they were strident, but effective, empowering blacks in a system that was stacked against them. Others say the Panthers were a hindrance to the civil rights movement, dedicated more to posturing and sensationalism than actual change.
Breitbart.com’s John Hayward called the Radical Brownies a “horrifying” development that is so “creepy and fascist” as to beggar belief.
“(T)hey’re being filled with false propaganda by adults who seek to take advantage of them,” said Hayward of the girls. “But that’s how fascists have always worked.”
He went on to call the group “a form of child abuse” and argues that the girls are not being sufficiently warned away from “the dangers of playing race-card narratives, particularly those founded on false mythology.” It is a “chilling thought,” he said, that the group may expand to other areas of the country.
Critics of the group are particularly alarmed that the girls are wearing berets that mimic those worn by the Black Panthers, but adult co-founder of the group Marilyn Hollinquest told KPIX-TV, “I think it’s very appropriate. A lot of the work the Black Panthers did was community oriented.”
Hollinquest formed the group with her friend Anayvette Martinez because they felt that their daughters needed a group where they could explore their heritage and enjoy the company of other girls like themselves while also coming to terms our current racially divided society.
“How amazing would it be to have a girls’ troop that was really focused around social justice and where girls could even earn badges?” said Martinez.
At the Libertarian-leaning Taki’s Magazine, Jim Goad asked, “When do Brownies become brownshirts?”
“This fledgling organization is not affiliated with the Girl Scouts of America,” Goad complained, “and was formed in December by a black woman and a Hispanic woman who describe themselves as “queer women of color and avid trans allies.”
He went on to grouse about the racial makeup of the troupe, writing that the group “consists of about a dozen mostly Hispanic-looking girls ages 8-11 who are enabled and ideologically prodded along by the aforementioned queer women of color.”
Goad found himself baffled and unable to decipher the group’s community-oriented manifesto, saying, “I have no idea what any of that means. These buzzwords and catchphrases convey emotions I’ve never felt and concepts I’ve never imagined. Sometimes these types seem so empowered, I wonder how they avoid short-circuiting themselves.”
“What would dear old departed Lord Baden Powell think of all this?” Goad lamented. Robert Baden-Powell was the British nobleman who is credited with founding the Scouting movement that ultimately spawned the Boy and Girl Scouts of America.
“What would the crisply disciplined English Brownies of the 1950s marching in clean formation to impress Princess Margaret make of it all?” Goad wrote.
When KPIX asked about the furious backlash the Radical Brownies have received both online and off, Hollinquest said, “We did strike a nerve. We definitely did strike a nerve.”
But she feels the group’s social justice message in on-target for the times and is a good way of explaining to kids the often-upsetting headlines about the deaths of unarmed teens of color like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown.
“Kids already understand fairness and unfairness,” said Hollinquist, “so we take that understanding at an age-appropriate level.”
Watch video about this story, embedded below:
White House lawyers were desperate not to talk about Rudy Giuliani — or Trump’s other conspiracy theories: CNN analyst
On Saturday, CNN analyst Gloria Borger noted a key piece of the timeline that was conveniently missing from the defense presented by President Donald Trump's legal team: The involvement of Trump's private lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
"The one person that Jay Sekulow didn't mention is Rudy Giuliani, because this is Rudy Giuliani's theory of the game here," said Borger. "They were very careful not to bring up Rudy Giuliani because they know that he is not well regarded in the United States Senate, but if you again look at this summary of the transcript of the president's phone call, the president talks about CrowdStrike, he talks about a lot of things that went on. 'I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people, I would like to have you get to the bottom of it,' this whole nonsense, he talked about Bob Mueller and said a lot of it started with Ukraine."
Pompeo ridiculed by CNN panel for his ‘phony mock outrage’ response after being outed as a foul-mouthed bully
Responding to a statement from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued through the State Department accusing an NPR journalist of being "shameless" for going public with an encounter she had with him in his offices where he cursed at her, a CNN panel all but rolled their eyes at his "phony" outrage.
Speaking with host Anderson Cooper, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called out the blustery Pompeo as well as many Republicans who took "umbrage" at Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) mentioning a report that the Donald Trump would have their heads on "on a pike" if they crossed him.
Trump attorney Sekulow’s impeachment defense of president blown out of the water with Lindsey Graham statement
On Saturday, one of the biggest opening arguments made by President Donald Trump's legal team at the impeachment trial was that there was, in fact, a risk that Ukraine had meddled in U.S. elections.
"Mr. Schiff and his colleagues repeatedly told you that the intelligence community assessment that Russia was acting alone, responsible for the election interference, implying this somehow debunked the idea there might be in — you know, interference from other countries, including Ukraine," said Trump counsel Jay Sekulow. "This is basically what we call a straw man argument."
But MSNBC's Brian Williams knocked down this defense with a clip from none other than one of President Donald Trump's biggest allies: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC).