Amy Pascal will step down as co-chairman of Sony Pictures Entertainment after hackers angry about a movie she championed mocking North Korea’s dictator exposed a raft of embarrassing emails between Pascal and other Hollywood figures.
One of the most powerful women executives in Hollywood, Pascal had kept a low profile since her emails were leaked by hackers and widely reported by media, particularly one in which she made racially insensitive remarks about President Barack Obama’s taste in film.
Sony Pictures said Pascal will step down from her current post in May to launch her own production venture on the studio lot with its financial backing.
Sony Pictures Chief Executive and Chairman Michael Lynton told Reuters that the emails leaked late last year played no role in his and Pascal’s decision not to renew her contract in March 2015.
The entertainment arm of Sony Corp was victim of the most destructive cyberattack on a private company on U.S. soil.
The U.S. government has blamed the hack on North Korea after the reclusive nation was angered by a Sony comedy The Interview, which depicts the fictional assassination of leader Kim Jong Un.
Pascal had greenlighted the movie, which opened in limited release after the studio reversed a decision, condemned by Obama, to cancel its theatrical release.
Having her emails laid out for all of Hollywood to see appeared to be a big blow to the 56-year-old studio boss known for her good relationships with actors and her backing of edgy films like Zero Dark Thirty and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.
DEFENDERS OF PASCAL
In an email exchange between Pascal and producer Scott Rudin that was reported by website Gawker, Rudin called famed actress Angelina Jolie a “minimally talented spoiled brat” because of her demands during a remake of Cleopatra. Jolie has not responded publicly to the remarks since the email exchange was disclosed.
In another email, Pascal joked about President Barack Obama’s race and his taste in movies. Pascal subsequently issued a public apology for “insensitive and inappropriate” emails, and met with civil rights activist Reverend Al Sharpton, who did not call for her to step down.
Several celebrities also came to her defense, arguing that no one should have their private emails picked over in public.
“I would hope that we would not stand in such harsh judgment in a moment of time when someone is hacked in their private conversations,” media mogul Oprah Winfrey told CNN when asked about the remarks about Obama.
Pascal, who joined Sony’s Columbia Pictures in 1988, said she and Lynton had been discussing her transition to producer for “quite some time.”
“As the slate for the next 2 years has come together, it felt like the right time to transition into this new role,” Pascal said in a statement from the company, adding “I am leaving the studio in great hands.”
Sony did not immediately disclose who would be filling her post. But Sony employees have said one possible successor could be Michael De Luca, the producer of The Social Network and the upcoming Fifty Shades of Grey, who was hired in 2013 as president of production at Sony’s Columbia Pictures unit.
Lynton and Pascal have endured a tough few years, from an activist investor’s challenge to their leadership to job cuts after a few notable bombs like White House Down and After Earth.
Lynton told Reuters last month that the costs of the hacking episode – which crippled the computer network for months – would be amply covered by insurance and that there were no more restructuring plans for the studio.
Lynton said in that interview that a major challenge would be reestablishing trust in the company and Hollywood after sensitive information like salaries and private emails were posted online.
“I am very confident we can return to normal, but I think that level of transparency on some of those issues creates trust issues,” he said.
Pascal’s new production venture will focus on film, television and theater, the studio said. As part of a four-year agreement, Sony Pictures will finance Pascal’s venture and retain distribution rights to films financed.
(Reporting by Mary Milliken and Lisa Richwine; Additional reporting by Mary Milliken; editing by Christian Plumb)
‘The monarch has taken a body blow’: Ex-prosecutor explains why Court ruling is devastating for Trump
On MSNBC Thursday, former federal prosecutor John Flannery broke down the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling against President Donald Trump on immunity from subpoenas.
"I think what it says is that the monarch has taken a body blow as a result of what will be an historic decision, as we've indicated," said Flannery. "I think that the position of the DA in New York is very special, because he can speed this up in a way that the House can',t and has a specific strength, I think, in this case, that it is criminal."
"The most significant thing about it is this is the first Supreme Court case in which there's ever been agreed that a prosecutor could subpoena a president," added Flannery. "Prior prosecutions have been federal, that have been treated by the Supreme Court. So this is a big difference. The majority of the court, 7-2, basically said, from 1740 on, the public is entitled to the testimony, to the evidence of any person. They said that the documents — the question is the character documents, not the character of the person. In this case, what we have is a situation which I bet that the DA is going to go to the court as soon as possible, move to compel an appearance to their subpoena, and going to have the discussion as to what if anything may be limited or excluded and get production as quickly as possible."
Trump officials demanded the Army ‘dig for misconduct’ to justify firing Lt. Col. Vindman
This week, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman willingly left the Army after decades of honorable service. He cited a concerted campaign of "bullying" from the highest branches of power in the United States, and now more details are becoming known.
A New Yorker report revealed that top aides to President Donald Trump were told that they needed to find dirt on Vindman that could justify the firing of the decorated war hero.
"Vindman expected to go to the National War College this fall—a low-profile assignment—then take another foreign posting," the New Yorker reported. "But, in a final act of revenge, the White House recently made clear that Trump opposed Vindman’s promotion. Senior Administration officials told [Defense Secretary Mark] Esper and Ryan McCarthy, the Secretary of the Army, to dig for misconduct that would justify blocking Vindman’s promotion. They couldn’t find anything, multiple sources told me. Others in the military chain of command began to warn Vindman that he would never be deployable overseas again—despite his language skills and regional expertise."
Russian bounties: Pentagon vows ‘action’ if intel confirmed
Top Pentagon officials pledged Thursday to "take action" if the US military could corroborate intelligence suggesting Moscow paid militants linked to the Taliban to kill US soldiers in Afghanistan.
General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Defense Secretary Mark Esper spoke before a congressional committee as the Trump administration comes under pressure to explain media reports claiming the president was briefed on the intelligence -- but did nothing in response.
Milley said the information was "not corroborated."
"We'll get to the bottom of it. We are going to find out if, in fact, it's true. And if it is true, we will take action," he continued, without specifying what kind of action might be taken.