Amy Pascal will step down as co-chairman of Sony Pictures Entertainment after hackers angry about a movie she championed mocking North Korea’s dictator exposed a raft of embarrassing emails between Pascal and other Hollywood figures.
One of the most powerful women executives in Hollywood, Pascal had kept a low profile since her emails were leaked by hackers and widely reported by media, particularly one in which she made racially insensitive remarks about President Barack Obama’s taste in film.
Sony Pictures said Pascal will step down from her current post in May to launch her own production venture on the studio lot with its financial backing.
Sony Pictures Chief Executive and Chairman Michael Lynton told Reuters that the emails leaked late last year played no role in his and Pascal’s decision not to renew her contract in March 2015.
The entertainment arm of Sony Corp was victim of the most destructive cyberattack on a private company on U.S. soil.
The U.S. government has blamed the hack on North Korea after the reclusive nation was angered by a Sony comedy The Interview, which depicts the fictional assassination of leader Kim Jong Un.
Pascal had greenlighted the movie, which opened in limited release after the studio reversed a decision, condemned by Obama, to cancel its theatrical release.
Having her emails laid out for all of Hollywood to see appeared to be a big blow to the 56-year-old studio boss known for her good relationships with actors and her backing of edgy films like Zero Dark Thirty and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.
DEFENDERS OF PASCAL
In an email exchange between Pascal and producer Scott Rudin that was reported by website Gawker, Rudin called famed actress Angelina Jolie a “minimally talented spoiled brat” because of her demands during a remake of Cleopatra. Jolie has not responded publicly to the remarks since the email exchange was disclosed.
In another email, Pascal joked about President Barack Obama’s race and his taste in movies. Pascal subsequently issued a public apology for “insensitive and inappropriate” emails, and met with civil rights activist Reverend Al Sharpton, who did not call for her to step down.
Several celebrities also came to her defense, arguing that no one should have their private emails picked over in public.
“I would hope that we would not stand in such harsh judgment in a moment of time when someone is hacked in their private conversations,” media mogul Oprah Winfrey told CNN when asked about the remarks about Obama.
Pascal, who joined Sony’s Columbia Pictures in 1988, said she and Lynton had been discussing her transition to producer for “quite some time.”
“As the slate for the next 2 years has come together, it felt like the right time to transition into this new role,” Pascal said in a statement from the company, adding “I am leaving the studio in great hands.”
Sony did not immediately disclose who would be filling her post. But Sony employees have said one possible successor could be Michael De Luca, the producer of The Social Network and the upcoming Fifty Shades of Grey, who was hired in 2013 as president of production at Sony’s Columbia Pictures unit.
Lynton and Pascal have endured a tough few years, from an activist investor’s challenge to their leadership to job cuts after a few notable bombs like White House Down and After Earth.
Lynton told Reuters last month that the costs of the hacking episode – which crippled the computer network for months – would be amply covered by insurance and that there were no more restructuring plans for the studio.
Lynton said in that interview that a major challenge would be reestablishing trust in the company and Hollywood after sensitive information like salaries and private emails were posted online.
“I am very confident we can return to normal, but I think that level of transparency on some of those issues creates trust issues,” he said.
Pascal’s new production venture will focus on film, television and theater, the studio said. As part of a four-year agreement, Sony Pictures will finance Pascal’s venture and retain distribution rights to films financed.
(Reporting by Mary Milliken and Lisa Richwine; Additional reporting by Mary Milliken; editing by Christian Plumb)
Trump unleashes yet another maddening scandal as he opens the door to Saudi Arabian interference
I don’t often talk about how mad I am. I don’t often talk about how mad I am, because talking often about how mad I am prevents me from speaking clearly and rationally. I want to speak clearly and rationally. There is so much need for speaking clearly and rationally amid the endless streams of waste and filth polluting our public discourse.
But I can’t speak clearly and rationally at the expense of morality. Morality often begins with a feeling. The Gospels tell us of Jesus looking on the poor—he could hear and smell their misery—and he was “moved with pity.” But another way of putting it, another way of translating ?????????????, is that the rabbi felt compassion “in his guts.
US Supreme Court lets stand Kentucky law with abortion restrictions
The US Supreme Court on Monday let stand a Kentucky law that requires doctors to make patients seeking an abortion look at fetal images taken by echocardiogram and to listen to their heartbeat.
Without explanation, as is customary, the top US court refused to hear a suit challenging the state law, which was passed in 2017.
The law requires doctors to show patients echocardiogram images of the fetus and describe to them its size and organs and have them listen to its heartbeat if it is detectable, even if the patient objects.
Kentucky's authorities justified the measure as needed to obtain the patient's "informed consent" before proceeding with an abortion.
Chris Wallace shreds Ken Starr: Trump’s scandal ‘a much bigger issue than whether Bill Clinton lied about sex’
Fox News host Chris Wallace argued that the deeds President Donald Trump is accused of are more serious to the country than President Bill Clinton's actions, who was impeached for lying about sex.
During a break in impeachment hearings on Monday, Wallace called out Ken Starr's "characterization of this process and what we heard today... he said that the presentation against the president is narrow, prosecutors look through the world through dirty windows, it's slanted."
"And you know, it just seems to me -- and Ken, I see you there on the screen so I'll be talking directly to you -- when you compare this to the Clinton impeachment, which was basically about whether the president had lied under oath about sex," Wallace continued. "I'm not talking about whether this story is true or not."