Quantcast
Connect with us

Christian couple who spank kids for ‘Biblical’ reasons denied right to adopt by Mass. Supreme Court

Published

on

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld a ruling on Monday barring a Christian couple from adopting more children because they argue that the Bible condones them spanking their biological children, the Worcester Telegram reported.

Melanie and Gregory Magazu have argued that they only spanked their children in the bathroom so that they would not be humiliated. They said that the Department of Children and Families’ (DCF) decision to reject their application in 2012 was “arbitrary and capricious” and infringed upon their religious rights, since they followed the proverb, “Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A Worcester County Superior Court judge ruled last August that the couple’s use of corporal punishment would be harmful to prospective adoptees — many of whom are taken from abusive households — because it “could very well trigger the very trauma the placement was intended to mitigate.”

“They have to protect their kids — we get that,” Melanie Magazu said at the time. “But I think that not every family that’s spanking is an abusive family.”

The couple also said they would promise not to use the same sort of punishment against any child placed in their care, but the high court found in a unanimous decision that the DCF was right to reject their application.

“Although the department’s decision imposes a substantial burden on the Magazus’ sincerely held religious beliefs, this burden is outweighed by the department’s compelling interest in protecting the physical and emotional well-being of foster children,” the court stated.

[h/t The Friendly Atheist]

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

WATCH: Protesters celebrate as Chase Bank was set ablaze during Portland protests

Published

on

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump alerts ‘active-duty U.S. military police’ for possible deployment to Minnesota: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump's administration is contemplating using active-duty U.S. troops in an attempt to quell the protests in Minneapolis, the Associated Press reported early Saturday morning.

As unrest spread across dozens of American cities on Friday, the Pentagon took the rare step of ordering the Army to put several active-duty U.S. military police units on the ready to deploy to Minneapolis, where the police killing of George Floyd sparked the widespread protests," the AP reported.

"Soldiers from Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Drum in New York have been ordered to be ready to deploy within four hours if called, according to three people with direct knowledge of the orders. Soldiers in Fort Carson, in Colorado, and Fort Riley in Kansas have been told to be ready within 24 hours. The people did not want their names used because they were not authorized to discuss the preparations," the AP explained.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

John Roberts joins liberals as Supreme Court rejects challenge to Newsom’s COVID-19 limits on California church attendance

Published

on

In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday rejected an emergency appeal from the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, California. The San Diego area church tried to challenge the state's limits on attendance at worship services:

The church argued that limits on how many people can attend their services violate constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and had been seeking an order in time for services on Sunday. The church said it has crowds of 200 to 300 people for its services.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image