Quantcast
Connect with us

How the rumors about Prince’s death show Americans’ lack of skill in using drugs

Published

on

When a famous person dies mysteriously and prematurely these days, we are instantly led to consider their drug use as cause of death.

This article was originally published by The Influence, a news site that covers the full spectrum of human relationships with drugs. Follow The Influence on Facebook or Twitter.

Prince, the multitalented musician and entertainer, who was found dead at his estate outside Minneapolis last week, is a prime candidate for such speculation. We need to withhold judgment until toxicology and other autopsy data are made public, of course. But current reports suggesting that drugs played a major role in his death, and how they did so, speak to a much wider point: Americans’ lack of skill at drug use.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is unusual for a 57-year old person to die instantly, from no visible cause. Sometimes heart attacks act this way. But Prince didn’t appear to suffer a heart attack, he wasn’t known to suffer from heart disease, and he didn’t display such risk factors as smoking, obesity and lack of physical activity.

But the outward signs of his death are consistent—not with single-drug overdose, a rare malady—but drug poisoning, or the combined effects of various narcotic and depressant drugs. (The New York City Medical Examiner’s Office finds multiple drug use present in 97% of drug-related deaths.)

Of course, Prince was famous for his “clean” lifestyle. In addition to not smoking and not drinking, he was known as being vehemently “anti-drug,” eschewing marijuana, cocaine and other street drugs.

But his hands-off approach seemingly didn’t hold for pharmaceuticals—particularly opioids.

We are now being fed information that the emergency landing of Prince’s plane several days prior to his death was due to a narcotic “overdose” requiring an injection of a narcotic antagonist such as naloxone. TMZ has also published photos of Prince in a parking lot supposedly waiting impatiently for someone to bring him a prescription for a painkiller, Percocet.

ADVERTISEMENT

But people don’t tend to die unintentionally from Percocet prescriptions. A new, more plausible narrative is emerging: sub rosa use by Prince of prescription opioids whose effects were compounded by other, medically prescribed painkillers.

According to the Daily Mail, “the performer’s long-time dealer—who asked to be named only as Doctor D—revealed the singer would spend up to $40,000 at a time on six-month supplies of Dilaudid pills and Fentanyl patches.”

People usually have an explanation, a need, for such drug use. According to Dr D, “Prince suffered crippling stage fright and could not get on stage and perform without the drugs—but had a phobia of doctors so could not obtain a prescription legally.”

ADVERTISEMENT

This still does not add up to deadly drug use. We might be surprised at prominent people’s regular use of pharmaceuticals in support of both their daily lives and their public, performing selves. But few die from such use.

Added into this mix in Prince’s case was that Prince was known to be suffering from hip pain. “Dr D suggests it could have been a physician that unknowingly contributed to Prince’s death—by prescribing strong pain killers to the singer for his hip condition without knowing the extent of his secret opiate addiction.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While the veracity of Dr D’s account remains to be seen, it has the advantage of making sense by proposing how a well-heeled individual, able to receive the best of health care, could end up overusing combinations of narcotic drugs that could kill him.

If this account ultimately holds water, it brings to the forefront several regrettable elements in the singer-songwriter-musician’s biography, and leads us to these conclusions about unhealthy and dangerous drug use:

  • Being “anti-drug”—meaning anti-recreational drug use—is no guarantee that a person won’t overuse meds in dangerous and addictive ways (think Elvis, Michael Jackson and Rush Limbaugh). Indeed, this strangely ambivalent attitude towards drugs might itself be considered a specific causative risk factor in dangerous drug use and negative drug outcomes, one that hinders sensible and safe drug use.
  • Prince seemingly was an isolated person. He lived alone and was only discovered dead by employees entering his estate in the morning. Having intimate human associations and others monitor one’s behavior and ongoing health can be lifesaving (think Amy Winehouse, who died alone from a combination of alcohol and benzodiazepines prescribed following rehab).
  • What Prince failed to display was open acknowledgement of his drug use and awareness of best drug-using practices.

All Americans use drugs, whether legal or illegal. A mature response to this situation is to acknowledge it and seek to make drug use safer—as opposed to denying it, stigmatizing it and thereby encouraging individuals like Prince to remain secretive, uninformed and vulnerable.

ADVERTISEMENT

Based on these early reports around Prince’s death, one might suspect that he—like many other Americans—tragically lacked needed skills and knowledge around drug use.

Stanton Peele is a columnist for The Influence. His latest book, with Ilse Thompson, is Recover!: An Empowering Program to Help You Stop Thinking Like an Addict and Reclaim Your Life. He has been at the cutting-edge of addiction theory and practice since writing, with Archie Brodsky, Love and Addiction in 1975. He has since written numerous other books and developed the online Life Process Program. His website is Peele.net. Dr. Peele has won career achievement awards from the Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies and the Drug Policy Alliance. He is currently working on an e-book: How to Use Drugs. You can follow him on Twitter: @speele5.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Nicolle Wallace breaks down the impeachment moment ‘women will be talking about for years’

Published

on

MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace on Thursday highlighted one of the key moments from the impeachment inquiry testimony from Dr. Fiona Hill.

"Often when women show anger, it’s not fully appreciated. It’s often, you know, pushed onto emotional issues perhaps, or deflected on other people," Hill testified.

Here's Fiona Hill on why she thinks Sondland misunderstood her anger — and how women's anger is often viewed, more generally: "It's not fully appreciated. It's often pushed off onto emotional issues." pic.twitter.com/AsMR3A9InI

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Mulvaney lawyer denies Mick was ‘so heavily involved’ — despite his White House briefing room confession

Published

on

Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney was referenced multiple times during Dr. Fiona Hill's testimony Thursday, but Mulvaney's lawyer said he doesn't understand why.

"We have no idea why Ms. Hill believes Mr. Mulvaney was so heavily involved, especially in light of Ambassador Sondland’s contrary testimony," said Fox News reporter Chad Pergram, quoting a statement from Robert Driscoll.

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1197633921065930753

As former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance pointed out, Hill recalled during her testimony how angry she was about Sondland not briefing her. She said that after hearing his testimony Wednesday and learning he was briefing Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, Mulvaney and President Donald Trump. She then decided he was correct-they had separate missions and Sondland was on a domestic political errand.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

RNC blew nearly $100,000 to help put Trump Jr’s book on the bestseller list

Published

on

A new Federal Elections Commission filing unearthed by New York Times reporter Nick Confessore shows that the Republican National Committee blew nearly $100,000 to help promote Donald Trump Jr.'s book "Triggered."

According to the filing, the RNC made a $94,800 payment to bookseller Books-a-Million on October 29th this year, which was just days before Trump Jr.'s "Triggered" was released on November 5th.

An RNC spokesman confirmed to Confessore that "the expenditure was connected to their promotion of Don Trump Jr.'s book."

The RNC had previously claimed that it didn't make a bulk purchase but had only been "ordering copies to keep up with demand" of the book. When asked by Confessore how they could claim they weren't making bulk purchases when they bought roughly $100,000 worth of books, the RNC simply replied, "We stand by our statement."

Continue Reading
 
 

Happy Holidays!

As a special thank you from all of us at Raw, we're offering Raw Story ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. Now 'til Dec. 31st.
Offer Expires In:
close-link