Quantcast
Connect with us

Oregon cancer survivor’s payday loan balloons from $300 to $40,000 — after filing for bankruptcy

Published

on

In 2013, Stephanie Banks was in the midst of a battle with lung cancer, and like many who are stricken with serious illness, she also had a cash shortfall. So, according to the Oregonian, Banks turned to Rapid Cash, a payday lender, for a $300 loan.

The Portland woman signed off on the loan that had an interest rate of 153 percent — the highest allowed under Oregon law.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Banks filed for bankruptcy after her cancer left her too weak to work. She thought nothing of it — until she got a letter in the mail claiming she now owes $40,000 on that $300 loan.

Now that her cancer is in remission, Banks says the letter gave her a huge shock.

“I said, ‘These people are trying to give me a heart attack. … I don’t have $40,000,'” she told the Oregonian.

Even a consumer attorney, who has taken on Banks’ case pro bono, can’t figure out how her loan ballooned the way it did. The attorney, Michael Fuller, said Banks shouldn’t owe anything.

“The number has to be zero because she’s in bankruptcy,” he told the paper.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the Oregonian, Banks can’t take her complaint before the courts, because her agreement forces her to instead go before a private arbiter chosen by Rapid Cash.

Consumer advocate Amanda Werner told the Oregonian that such arbiters don’t have to have legal training and are bound by law. And in Banks’ case, she could be stuck paying the cost of representation hired by Rapid Cash to handle her case.

Banks, who lives off of a $1,240 social security check, said there’s just no way she can pay.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This will have to be sorted out, there’s no way I can pay $40,000,” Banks told the paper. “If I could pay them $40,000, I wouldn’t have filed bankruptcy.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘A damn liar’: Bill Barr ripped for ‘playing clean up for Trump’ after release of IG report

Published

on

Attorney General William Barr massaged the findings of the Department of Justice investigation into the origins of the Russia probe -- and legal experts and other social media users were appalled.

The attorney general claimed this report, like special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, had cleared President Donald Trump of wrongdoing, and insisted the probe had found the FBI had conducted an improper investigation of his 2016 presidential campaign.

“The Inspector General’s report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken," Barr said in a statement. "It is also clear that, from its inception, the evidence produced by the investigation was consistently exculpatory.”

Continue Reading

Facebook

‘Staggering’ new data shows income of top 1% has grown 100 times faster than bottom 50% since 1970

Published

on

"The bulk of a generation of economic growth has been captured and concentrated in a few hands, and many people have barely seen any of it."

New data released Monday explains the numbers behind Sen. Bernie Sanders' often-cited statistic that the three richest Americans hold more wealth than the 160 million people who make up the bottom 50% of the population.

Washington Post columnist Greg Sargent published what he called "stunning" findings from Stanford University economist Gabriel Zucman, showing how both an explosion in annual earnings by the rich and an increasingly regressive tax structure have combined to allow the top 1% of Americans' wealth to triple over the past five decades.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Ex-GOP lawmaker: Trump is a ‘cult figure’ who has forced Republicans to abandon their principles

Published

on

Former GOP lawmaker William Cohen, who was among the congressional Republicans who turned on former President Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal, tells NBC News that there is no way his party will ever turn on President Donald Trump.

Reflecting on the differences today between the GOP under Trump and Nixon, Cohen said that GOP officials in the 1970s felt far more free to challenge their own party's president than they do today.

Continue Reading