Quantcast
Connect with us

Racist Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s legal case is costing Arizona taxpayers millions of dollars

Published

on

Residents of Arizona’s Maricopa County may once again foot the bill for a court case against Joe Arpaio, the county’s notorious sheriff whose racial profiling against Latino residents a judge has ruled illegal.

On Tuesday, the Stamford Advocate reported that lawyers in the case against Arpaio are seeking $5.9 million in legal fees and expenses for pursuing contempt of court charges against the sheriff. The Stamford Advocate noted that if granted, the request would mark the second time a court gave the attorneys such a monetary award, the lawyers having received almost $4.5 million last year for bringing the racial profiling case against Arpaio to trial.

Although Sheriff Arpaio has long been a popular public figure among county voters, the Arizona Republic’s Laurie Roberts expressed the frustration of many Maricopa County residents in an op-ed on Tuesday that pointed out the county’s taxpayers will once again pay the legal fees in a case against their controversial sheriff. Roberts wrote that in addition to the $4.5 million taxpayers will pay for this round of fees, they have shelled out a total of $10.4 million in lawyer bills for this case alone.

“In all, we’ve already paid $51 million as a result of Snow’s ruling that Arpaio’s office systematically violated the civil rights of Latinos,” Roberts wrote.

The proposed costs come after the judge presiding over the most recent racial profiling case against Arpaio handed the first of what may be several legal punishments against the Maricopa County sheriff. According to the Associated Press, on July 20, U.S. District Judge Murray Snow demanded an overhaul of the sheriff department’s internal affairs investigations against Arpaio. AP noted that Judge Snow previously found Arpaio in civil contempt of court after the sheriff disobeyed the court’s order that he stop his immigration patrols.

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition to finding Arpaio in contempt, AP wrote, Judge Snow previously ruled that the sheriff department’s internal affairs investigations into officer misconduct had been manipulated to protect cops from punishment. The judge is now considering criminal charges against Arpaio and his top aide, Jerry Sherridan, that could lead to the two of them facing jail time. The lawyers in the case against Arpaio also want the sheriff to compensate Latinos who his department illegally detained:

The lawyers who won the profiling case say Arpaio should be required to pull $300,000 out of his own pocket to help compensate Latinos who were illegally detained. The sheriff has not had to foot the legal bills directly tied to his official duties in any of the lawsuits filed against him during his 23-year tenure.

But Maricopa County residents haven’t just had to pony up money in legal cases against the lawman who styles himself as “America’s Toughest Sheriff.” As Raw Story previously reported on July 2, Arpaio spent tax dollars to ensure that every one of the county’s 8,000 inmates were adorned in American flag-themed clothing prior to Independence Day.

ADVERTISEMENT

Arpaio’s antics may seem merely absurd, but Raw Story also noted that his harsh policing practices in an effort to have resulted in tragic consequences. In May 2009, Marcia Powell, a 48-year-old sex worker, died of heat exposure after the sheriff’s department placed her in a cage for four hours in the sun. Arpaio has also constructed an outdoor tent city that is designed so inmates will suffer extreme heat.

At the Republican National Convention last week, Yahoo News reported,  Sheriff Arpaio praised Donald Trump, claiming that, “We need a leader who will protect our borders and enforce our laws.”


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t even a competent investor: report

Published

on

There can be no doubt that high-powered hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein would rather the public know him for his prominence and success as an investor than for the allegations of child sex trafficking, for which he has now been indicted and faces life in prison. And there has for years been mystique surrounding Epstein's business — his wealth fund is so exclusive that it reportedly requires a billion dollars up front from clients.

But according to the Dow Jones' periodical Barron's, Epstein may not even be good at that.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Jon Stewart blasts ‘abomination’ of Rand Paul trying to ‘balance the budget on the backs of’ 9/11 responders

Published

on

On Wednesday's edition of Fox News' "Special Report," comedian and activist Jon Stewart slammed Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) for blocking unanimous consent for a bill to support health care for 9/11 first responders.

"Pardon me if I'm not impressed in any way by Rand Paul's fiscal responsibility virtue signaling," said Stewart to anchor Bret Baier, who appeared on the show with first responder and activist John Feal.

He added that Paul's complaint, that the bill was unfunded, rings hollow given that he "added hundreds of billions of dollars to our deficit" with the GOP tax cuts for billionaires. He castigated Paul for trying to "balance the budget on the backs of the 9/11 first responder community."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Republicans will never say that racism is ‘racism’ — basically because they’re racist

Published

on

Is there any expression of racism that Republicans will actually admit is racism? It's a question on a lot of progressive minds in the wake of Donald Trump demonizing female congresswomen of color with the "go back" canard that white nationalists and other assorted racists have long used to abuse anyone with heritage they dislike, whether that heritage is Jewish, Irish, Italian, African, Latin American or Muslim. Telling someone to "go back" is, in the ranks of racist statements, right up there with calling a person the N-word or some other rank slur. Yet, there still appears to be resistance among Republicans to admitting that is racism, which leads many on the left to wonder: If this doesn't count, then what could possibly count?

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Enjoy Summer! Try Raw Story Ad-Free for $1. Invest in Progressive Journalism.
close-image