As a journalist for The New Yorker, Mark Singer has written extensively about the GOP’s presidential nominee.
Recently he gave a talk about his new book, Trump and Me, published earlier this month, where he answered questions about his reporting from an audience. In the hour-long talk held at Politics & Prose Bookstore in Washington, D.C. and published Wednesday, Singer discusses his take on the presidential nominee based on his work writing profiles about Trump for the New Yorker.
Singer said he believed Trump never expected to make it this far in the election, and was hoping to wind up second behind one of the other primary candidates. He said he is not into “details” and probably had no plans to actually be president.
“Would a person who really wants to be elected run without a staff, without a ground game state-to-state, without a fundraising network, without any regard for policy nuances, no concept of governance and all the other things that one does to prepare,” Singer said. “Can you imagine Trump debating Hillary Clinton?”
“I think his greatest fear is losing, period,” Singer said. “I think he’s at best very conflicted about it.”
When asked by moderator and fellow New Yorker staff writer Jane Mayer why Trump would put himself in this position, Singer answered it was ego-driven.
“His ego is — there’s nothing like it really,” Singer said. “We’ve never witnessed anyone like this in public life. I mean, people compare Trump to P.T. Barnum, but P.T. Barnum was promoting other acts and things like this, and he has been promoting himself. There is no real Donald Trump. There is ‘Donald Trump.’ He is his brand… He’s predicated his whole existence on leveraging his name, Donald Trump, and everything that he’s ever done, I thought, has been calculated as an extension of the brand. He’s not a details person plainly.”
Singer then referenced a piece by Stephanie Cegielski, a former public relations staffer who defected and now claims Trump didn’t intend to become the Republican nominee.
“The Trump camp would have been satisfied to see him polling at 12% and taking second place to a candidate who might hold 50%. His candidacy was a protest candidacy,” she wrote. “It pains me to say, but he is the presidential equivalent of Sanjaya on American Idol.”
Singer agreed with Mayer that Trump is now stuck — but “he just wants to hear his name shouted from the public, and he responds to it.”
Watch the entire talk, as posted to YouTube, here:
Vietnamese women strive to clear war-era mines
Inching across a field littered with Vietnam war-era bombs, Ngoc leads an all-women demining team clearing unexploded ordnance that has killed tens of thousands of people -- including her uncle.
"He died in an explosion. I was haunted by memories of him," Le Thi Bich Ngoc tells AFP as she oversees the controlled detonation of a cluster bomb found in a sealed-off site in central Quang Tri province.
More than 6.1 million hectares of land in Vietnam remain blanketed by unexploded munitions -- mainly dropped by US bombers -- decades after the war ended in 1975.
At least 40,000 Vietnamese have since died in related accidents. Victims are often farmers who accidentally trigger explosions, people salvaging scrap metal, or children who mistake bomblets for toys.
Chief Justice John Roberts issues New Year’s Eve warning to stand up for democracy
"In our age, when social media can instantly spread rumor and false information on a grand scale, the public's need to understand our government, and the protections it provides, is ever more vital," he wrote. "We should celebrate our strong and independent judiciary, a key source of national unity and stability."
Trump’s next 100 days will dictate whether he can be re-elected or not — here’s why
According to CNN pollster-in-residence Harry Enten, Donald Trump's next 100 days -- which could include an impeachment trial in the Senate -- will hold the key to whether he will remain president in 2020.
As Eten explains in a column for CNN, "His [Trump's] approval rating has been consistently low during his first term. Yet his supporters could always point out that approval ratings before an election year have not historically been correlated with reelection success. But by mid-March of an election year, approval ratings, though, become more predictive. Presidents with low approval ratings in mid-March of an election year tend to lose, while those with strong approval ratings tend to win in blowouts and those with middling approval ratings usually win by small margins."