Quantcast
Connect with us

Here are 4 times James Comey’s authoritarian instincts undermined justice in the United States

Published

on

After James Comey’s decision to not pursue charges against Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton this past summer, some Democratic partisans praised him as a true man of integrity.

However, a cursory examination of his career shows that Comey is anything but a principled champion of following the law to the letter — and that Democrats were foolish for praising him as such. As the Guardian’s Trevor Trimm writes, Comey has often “taken authoritarian and factually dubious public stances both at odds with responsible public policy and sometimes the law.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Below, we’ll recap four times Comey has shown bad judgement and has undermined justice in the United States.

Support for indefinite detention without trial of American citizens. While he was a Deputy Attorney General, Comey made the argument that the Bush administration was right to imprison American citizen Jose Padilla indefinitely without any trial. The logic was that Padilla, he had been accused of conspiring to detonate a “dirty bomb” in Chicago, was an “enemy combatant” in the war against terrorism, and not a U.S. citizen who was owed due process.

“After a careful process, [President Bush] decided to declare Jose Padilla for what he was: an enemy combatant, a member of a terrorist army bent on waging war against innocent civilians,” Comey wrote in 2004. “And the president’s decision was to hold him to protect the American people and to find out what he knows. We now know much of what Jose Padilla knows, and what we have learned confirms that the president of the United States made the right call, and that that call saved lives.”

Support for strong mandatory minimum sentences. Despite the fact that there’s growing bipartisan consensus that mandatory minimum sentences have proven to be excessively punitive, Comey has continued to support them as a staple of our criminal justice system.

“I know from my experience… that the mandatory minimums are an important tool in developing cooperators,” he said when publicly objecting to reforms made by the Obama administration that cut down on the use of such sentences.

ADVERTISEMENT

Claiming that increases in crime are due to police feeling overly scrutinized. The so-called “Ferguson effect,” which posits that crime will go up if officers feel afraid to do their jobs over fear of public criticism, has no concrete evidence to back it up.

Nonetheless, that didn’t stop Comey in 2015 from saying that scrutiny of police is directly tied to increased crime.

“I don’t know whether that explains it entirely, but I do have a strong sense that some part of the explanation is a chill wind that has blown through American law enforcement over the last year,” he said during a speech at the University of Chicago Law School.

ADVERTISEMENT

Comey signed off on using torture — despite trying to convince the Bush administration that it was wrong. In 2005, Comey tried to convince the Bush administration that it shouldn’t use so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” such as waterboarding and wall slamming.

The New York Times reported in 2009 that even though Comey believed that techniques such as waterboarding were “just awful,” he still signed off on a legal opinion that gave the CIA the green light to use them during interrogations.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That opinion, giving the green light for the C.I.A. to use all 13 methods in interrogating terrorism suspects, including waterboarding and up to 180 hours of sleep deprivation, ‘was ready to go out and I concurred,’ Mr. Comey wrote to a colleague in an April 27, 2005, e-mail message obtained by The New York Times,” the publication wrote.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Adam Schiff moves to implicate Pence in the Ukraine scandal as Republicans go off the rails

Published

on

In the panoply of contradictory and incoherent defenses of Donald Trump, a favorite of Republicans has been to harp on the claim that witnesses to Trump's extortion scheme against Ukraine were all "second-hand" or "third-hand." This has always been confounding, as the official summary readout of the famous phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky shows Trump clearly conditioning military aid and U.S. support on Zelensky giving a public boost to Trump's conspiracy theories about former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democratic leaders. The witnesses so far have simply affirmed what the written record demonstrates amply.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Why saying ‘OK boomer’ at work is considered age discrimination – but millennial put-downs aren’t

Published

on

The phrase “OK boomer” has become a catch-all put-down that Generation Zers and young millennials have been using to dismiss retrograde arguments made by baby boomers, the generation of Americans who are currently 55 to 73 years old.

Though it originated online and primarily is fueling memes, Twitter feuds and a flurry of commentary, it has begun migrating to real life. Earlier this month, a New Zealand lawmaker lobbed the insult at an older legislator who had dismissed her argument about climate change.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Republicans are getting scared about Gordon Sondland’s Wednesday impeachment testimony: report

Published

on

Ambassador Gordon Sondland may be the most dangerous witness for President Donald Trump in the impeachment hearings so far, and that's in part because he has a lot to lose.

And according to CNN's Shimon Prokuecz, his scheduled testimony for Wednesday morning is making Republicans nervous:

Multiple GOP sources say they are most worried about what Gordon Sondland will do tomorrow - and whether he will turn on the President. The fear, Republicans say, is that he could undercut the last GOP defense. @mkraju

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image