Trump spokeswoman and supporter Scottie Nell Hughes told a CNN panel on Saturday that donors who are contributing to Jill Stein’s recount efforts in Wisconsin and beyond are “throwing their money away” and should be using their resources to “reorganize the Democratic Party.”
During the segment, Hughes told anchor Pamela Brown that there is no evidence to suggest that election results were hacked or altered.
She also questioned Stein’s motives, saying, “Why aren’t we questioning the states that Hillary Clinton won? Granted there’s not as many of them, Trump won 30 out of 50 states. Why are we just looking at states that Trump won?”
A. Scott Bolden — former chairman of the Washington, D.C. Democratic Party — countered that the recounts are concerned with states where Trump won by 100,000 votes or fewer.
Brown asked why the Trump campaign has been impugning Stein’s character and saying that she is personally enriching herself when in fact all of the donor money raised is being placed in a dedicated account for the recount.
“Well, it’s because when you look at her, she’s upped the cost of what she’s trying to raise,” said Hughes. “If she was just raising the amount she needed to pay the fees and possibly $1 million more for attorneys, she would have raised that two days ago. She’s continued to up. She says it will cost more for lawyers and consultants, but she’s not giving a bottom line. As more money is coming in, she’s asking for money. That’s what makes this all look a little conspicuous [sic] as to what her intentions are.”
“She says she needs it to file in other states where she hasn’t missed the deadline,” Brown said.
“That’s my question,” said Hughes. “People that are actually going in, and I have to wonder who is this, if they’re donating so much money to her, more than she raised to run for president, what is their motivation? Do they think they’re just throwing their money away? She’s wasting dollars. Let’s put this to a better effort, maybe to reorganize the Democratic Party so they don’t suffer such a devastating loss.”
“What difference does it make what her motive is, quite frankly?” asked Bolden. “She’s got a right. Here’s the most legitimate thing about Jill Stein and a recount. They have no dog in the fight as far as winning that state or winning those electoral votes. This is purely about integrity and authenticity of the election process.”
Watch the video, embedded below:
After Trump: No free pass for Republicans — they own this nightmare
With the impeachment inquiry leveling up this month as public hearings begin, and with an election that might actually be the end of Donald Trump now less than a year away, the campaign to let Trump's Republican allies — even the most villainous offenders — move on and pretend this never happened is already underway.
This article first appeared in Salon.
Sadly, the clearest articulation of the let-bygones-be-bygones mentality has come from a Democrat — unsurprisingly, former Vice President Joe Biden.Biden, who is still, somehow, the frontrunner in Democratic primary polling, spoke at a chi-chi fundraiser on Wednesday, and dropped this pearl of wisdom: "With Donald Trump out of the way, you’re going to see a number of my Republican colleagues have an epiphany."
As climate crisis-fueled fires rage, fears grow of an ‘uninhabitable’ California
As activist Bill McKibben put it, "We've simply got to slow down the climate crisis."
With wildfires raging across California on Wednesday—and with portions of the state living under an unprecedented "Extreme Red Flag Warning" issued by the National Weather Service due to the severe conditions—some climate experts are openly wondering if this kind of harrowing "new normal" brought on by the climate crisis could make vast regions of the country entirely uninhabitable.
‘A profound emoluments clause violation’: Andrew Napolitano slams Trump’s hosting the G7 at Doral
In the wake of acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney's announcement this Thursday that next year's G7 summit will be hosted at President Trump's Doral golf club, Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano pointed out that Trump would be violating the emoluments clause if he were to go through with the move.
At the outset of the segment, Fox Business Network anchor Neil Cavuto said that the announcement is "effectively saying the president has given himself this contract."