Quantcast
Connect with us

Spicer tries to tap-dance away from MSNBC’s Mark Halperin repeated questions on Trump’s immigration ban

Published

on

In a Monday interview with “Morning Joe,” Donald Trump’s press secretary tap-danced around the justifications for the administration’s latest Muslim ban, Steve Bannon’s elevation to the National Security Council and the reported demotion of key members on the council.

Spicer explained that the administration took language from previous acts set in place directly following the terrorist attacks on 9/11. The registry that was put in place by then-President George W. Bush was ultimately disbanded after having been found to be ineffective and causing additional ethical and international concerns. Spicer again blamed former President Barack Obama for flagging countries on the list. Obama, however, never banned anyone from coming into the U.S. from those countries; he only limited visa-waiver travel from the 7 nations.

Spicer also justified the elevation of Steve Bannon to the National Security Council by claiming that both Karl Rove (under Bush) and David Axelrod (under Obama) also attended meetings. An NPR report disputed the point, saying that Axelrod “never sat in on Principals meetings” nor was he a permanent member as Bannon will be. Washington Post columnist David Ignatius cited Bush’s Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who said that the Rove and others in similar positions should not be allowed to serve in that capacity.

Spicer argued that Rove is no Bannon and that Trump’s senior advisor has extensive experience in military and geopolitical affairs. The concern from the panel, however, was not just that Bannon was elevated but that members of the NSC were “downgraded” and brought to Bannon’s level. According to the New York Times, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence will now only attend meetings when necessary.

Morning Joe regular Mark Halperin wondered if Trump’s ban will impact relationships with countries like Pakistan and countries like Iraq, who are playing an important role in fighting the war on terrorism against ISIS and other movements that seek to harm the United States. Spicer, however, insisted that Trump made calls all weekend to Muslim nations to try and smooth over the ban. Iraq’s parliament responded by urging retaliation against the U.S. for the ban.

ADVERTISEMENT

Spicer also explained that causing rifts in relationships with strategic allies was not a concern in making this ban because Trump wants to “make America safe again.” He also cited statistics, that Trump later tweeted, about a mere 109 people “inconvenienced” by the order. Those 109 people were allowed back into the United States while many other refugees and travelers were put on planes back to their countries.

The panel cited reports surfacing from Department of Homeland Security and State Department officials who revealed that the order was not properly vetted, which Spicer dismissed as coming from low-level people in the Department and that anyone who matters was told. Key Senate Republicans echoed that sentiment over the weekend, saying that they too were not informed on the order. The reason others were not consulted, Spicer claimed, was to protect national security.

You can watch a clip below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Here’s the insidious role Sean Hannity played in derailing Al Franken’s political career

Published

on

The U.S. Senate lost one of its most prominent liberals when Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota, dogged by sexual harassment allegations, announced his resignation in December 2017. Some of Franken’s defenders believed the Democratic Party was too quick to throw him under the bus; other Democrats stressed that in light of the #MeToo movement, his resignation was absolutely necessary. Franken’s political downfall is the subject of an in-depth report by the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, who describes — among many other things — the role that Fox News’ Sean Hannity played in the media firestorm.

Continue Reading

Commentary

The media got it wrong: There’s no evidence GOP support for Trump improved after his racist outburst

Published

on

One of the most popular articles last week involved claims that polls showed Republicans had increased their support of President Trump.  But a closer analysis of the data reveals that any increase in support was within the margin of error.  So the polls couldn’t conclude that GOP support for President Trump had gone up or down.

Polls are tricky creatures.  We either give them near god-like status, or discount them entirely, often depending on whether they show us what we want.

I remember the movie “Machete,” where an opportunistic Texas politician fakes his own shooting.  Within five minutes of that story breaking, the news anchor reported that the politician had drastically improved his standing in the polls.  Surveys don’t work that way.

Continue Reading
 

Activism

Rep. Rashida Tlaib defies Trump in NAACP speech: ‘I’m not going nowhere, not until I impeach this president’

Published

on

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) defiantly insisted on Monday that she would be in Congress until President Donald Trump is impeached.

At the 2019 annual NAACP convention, the announcer noted that Tlaib is a member of the four congresswomen known as The Squad who have recently been told by Trump to "go back" home.

Tlaib began her remarks by alluding to the president's attack.

"I’m not going nowhere, not until I impeach this president," she shouted.

Watch the video below from the NAACP.

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image