Quantcast
Connect with us

Ex-Clinton aide reveals how the Arpaio pardon is Trump’s way of ‘sending a signal’ to Mueller’s targets — and it’s jaw-dropping

Published

on

After a late-night presidential pardon of Sheriff Joe Arpaio by Donald Trump, Bill Maher’s political panel ripped into the decision. However, it was Democratic strategist and CNN commentator Paul Begala that came up with the major reason Trump pardoned Arpaio: To prove he’ll do it for those involved in the Russia scandal.

Matt Welch, editor-at-large for Reason Magazine, pointed out that Trump said that Arpaio was simply “doing his job.” However, there were many ways in which Arpaio was violating the Constitutional rights of American citizens, “in defiance of a court order,” which is in direct violation of law enforcement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So if you’re going to go and suspend the normal process to pardon that guy, you’re saying — you’re telling ever law enforcement officer in the country, look, civil liberties don’t really matter here as long as you’re going after illegal immigrants”

Former White House senior director Nayyera Haq said that Arpaio’s pardon is an insight into “the ideology that Donald Trump might have.” She explained “it’s not a Republican or a conservative ideology, it’s an ideology that serves him and as an autocrat, right? He attacks the fourth estate and media and tries to break that down, removes trust that people can have with media as their protector.”

She noted that Trump has already been taking shots at the judicial branch of government and calling it an “activist” judiciary. She explained that the courts have been the last place people of color and the disenfranchised can go for help on civil liberty issues.

“So, by pardoning Joe Arpaio, a vigilante who flouts the rule of law, Trump has said it no longer matters if you are holding to a standard or a rule of law,” Haq said.

She went on to say that it is very scary for people of color when there is nowhere else to go for recourse if the courts aren’t there to protect you and “the president is going to override the judicial system.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Maher joked that Trump doesn’t even need to build the wall because the country has become so unfriendly to people of color that they don’t even want to come here.

Begala corrected to say that long before Trump took office those numbers were going down and that Trump’s wall will likely only slow down their departure. “Maybe mine, I don’t know,” he joked.

“On the Arpaio thing, yes, he has a soft spot for white nationalist, we all knew that,” Begala continued. “And yes he wants to flaunt the rule of law and he’s an autocrat wannabe. I think there’s another game here he’s playing. He wants to send a signal to the targets of the Mueller investigation that ‘if you hold tight and don’t roll on me, I’ll pardon you.’ Because Mueller is going after Trump associates first.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Begala’s comment took Maher by surprise and the two agreed that “all roads lead to Russia with this guy.”

“It’s the Rosetta Stone of his poor mangled brain is always thinking about Russia,” Begala joked.

ADVERTISEMENT

Maher said that it makes perfect sense, because Trump did what he always does. “He owed Russia money and he didn’t want to pay them so he gave them America.”

Watch the full panel discussion below:


'No rule of law': Maher panel perfectly nails… by sarahburris

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

‘If you kiss my butt, I will do something for you’: MSNBC commentator slams Trump’s ‘pay-to-play’ pardons

Published

on

On MSNBC Wednesday, analyst Jason Johnson broke down the self-serving logic of President Donald Trump's pardons.

"These people wrote him from prison, these people had friends asking him questions. Many of these people were connected to the president financially," said Johnson. "And it's the general message that he has, which is that this is a pay-to-play administration. If you kiss my butt, if you give me money, if you make me feel good about myself, if you praise me, if you come up for ridiculous names for yourself 15 minutes after you come out of prison, the I will do something for you."

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trump threatens federal government takeover of San Francisco: ‘It’s worse than a slum’

Published

on

President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the federal government may "step in" to take control of San Francisco and Los Angeles.

The president made the remarks at a White House event in Bakersfield, California. During the event, Trump responded to someone who said he wanted to "get rid" of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

"Get rid of Pelosi! That's okay with me!" Trump exclaimed. "Lot of people agree. Look what's happened to San Francisco. So sad what's happened, when you see a slum, where it's a slum. It's worse than a slum. There's no slum like that."

"It's something that we're going to do something about," he added. "Because if they don't fix it up, clean it up, take care of the homeless, do what they have to do but clean up their city, the federal government is going to have to step in. And we're going to do it in Los Angeles and San Francisco."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Martha McSally is in big trouble after impeachment votes: report

Published

on

Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) lost when she ran in 2018, but was given a participation prize by the Republican governor who had to appoint someone to cover Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) seat until it came up for reelection in 2020. Recent polling shows that McSally is in serious trouble.

Highground Public Affairs Consultants published their latest poll showing McSally has fallen significantly after the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

Going into the impeachment, McSally was polling at 42 percent at PPP polls, RealClearPolitics reported. However, the new data today shows McSally struggling to break 40. Instead, she's hovering around 39 percent, while her opponent, Mark Kelly is at 46 percent.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image