By Chris Kenning
An independent counsel will investigate claims that evidence was withheld in connection with a 2012 civil suit over the fatal shooting of a black man by a St. Louis police officer, Missouri’s attorney general said on…
Independent counsel to review evidence in St. Louis police shooting lawsuit
By Chris Kenning
(Reuters) – An independent counsel will investigate claims that evidence was withheld in connection with a 2012 civil suit over the fatal shooting of a black man by a St. Louis police officer, Missouri’s attorney general said on Monday
Attorney General Josh Hawley announced the move more than a week after a judge’s acquittal of former officer Jason Stockley on charges of murder for shooting Anthony Lamar Smith in 2011 sparked days of sometimes violent demonstrations in the city.
Smith’s family alleged in a Sept. 18 letter that officials, including some working under former Attorney General Chris Koster, withheld evidence in the wrongful death suit filed against the city in 2012, Hawley said in a statement.
Koster could not be immediately reached for comment on Monday. A spokeswoman for St. Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson declined to comment.
Smith’s family settled the suit for $900,000 in 2013, according to Al Watkins, an attorney for Smith’s fiancée, Christina Wilson.
Watkins told Reuters Monday that during the civil suit, staff from the attorney general’s office, then representing the city police, did not share certain evidence he requested including DNA test results and a bystander cell phone video he said was included in the criminal trial.
Watkins said lawyers representing the city told him they shared all the evidence they had.
The settlement could have been larger if all the evidence was available, said Watkins, who added that he may file a motion to reopen the suit and set aside the settlement.
“The attorney for the family of Anthony Lamar Smith has raised serious allegations of wrongdoing by the Koster administration,” Hawley said in a statement. “As Mr. Smith’s family states, these allegations deserve ‘a full, accurate, and transparent’ accounting.”
Smith tried to speed away from Stockley on Dec. 20, 2011, following an alleged drug deal, authorities said. During a car chase, Stockley could be heard saying in a police dashcam video that he was going to kill Smith, prosecutors said.
After the chase ended, Stockley approached Smith’s car and shot him five times, authorities said.
Stockley’s lawyers said he fired in self-defense, believing Smith was reaching for a gun. But prosecutors said the only gun recovered from the scene had only Stockley’s DNA on it.
Stockley left the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department in 2013.
(Reporting by Chris Kenning; Editing by Tom Brown)
Dutch man arrested for ‘Black Pete’ suicide bomb threat
Dutch police have arrested a man who threatened in a social media post to blow himself up over plans to sideline "Black Pete", a Christmas-time character provoking accusations of racist stereotyping.
The arrest is the latest controversy over the country's traditional Saint Nicholas side kick, portrayed in winter parades and by many Dutch children with a black face, thick red lips, woolly hair and a golden earring.
"A 49-year-old man from The Hague was arrested Monday afternoon after he threatened to blow himself up in support of the Saint Nicholas tradition," police said in a statement.
Trump’s claim on halting Ukraine aid contradicted by Pentagon official Laura Cooper
According to a new report from The Daily Beast, after the Pentagon's June announcement that it would give Ukraine $250 million in aid, Defense Department officials received a list of questions, seemingly originating from President Trump, seeking information about the aid.
“We got a question from my chain of command forwarded down from the chief of staff, I believe, from the Department of Defense, asking for a follow-up on a meeting with the President,” top Pentagon official Laura Cooper testified on Capitol Hill last month. “The way the email was phrased, it said follow-up from POTUS meeting, so follow-up from a meeting with the President. So, you know, I'm thinking that the questions were probably questions from the President. That's how I interpreted that subject line.”
The greatest scam in history: Why science failed to to stop climate change
It’s a tale for all time. What might be the greatest scam in history or, at least, the one that threatens to take history down with it. Think of it as the climate-change scam that beat science, big time.
Scientists have been seriously investigating the subject of human-made climate change since the late 1950s and political leaders have been discussing it for nearly as long. In 1961, Alvin Weinberg, the director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, called carbon dioxide one of the “big problems” of the world “on whose solution the entire future of the human race depends.” Fast-forward nearly 30 years and, in 1992, President George H.W. Bush signed the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), promising “concrete action to protect the planet.”