Quantcast
Connect with us

John Oliver calls BS on ‘fake’ forensic science that gets innocent people wrongly convicted

Published

on

Comedian John Oliver accused a slew of forensic scientists of outright racism during “Last Week Tonight” episode, and it isn’t just in real life.

“On TV and in real life, forensic science plays an important role in criminal convictions,” Oliver explained Sunday. Not all forensic science is as trustworthy as many think that it is. According to prosecutors, jurors in murder trials suffer from a “CSI effect,” and they never think about the results leaning one way or the other. Oliver cited the findings from a 2009 National Academy of Science report that explained many forensic scientists “do not meet the fundamental requirements of science.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A more recent report from the Presidential Science Council in 2016 revealed “expert witnesses have often overstated the probative value of their evidence, going far beyond what the relevant science can justify.”

“It’s not that all forensic science is bad, because it’s not,” Oliver said. However, the many documented problems with things like bite-marks or hair analysis are “by no means infallible.” Lawyers often use the phrase “from a reasonable degree of scientific certainty” when asking the experts to testify. Oliver argued that the phrase has a “scientific ring to it,” but according to the 2016 study, “that phrase has no generally accepted meaning in science.”

“When bad science is confidently presented, terrible convictions are possible,” Oliver said. “Among the hundreds of people who have been exonerated by DNA testing since 1989, at least half (49 percent) were involved in misapplication of forensic science.”

Judges in many cases, allow such evidence into trials due to procedures but not factual science. “Decisions about the validity of science are being made by people who don’t necessarily know much about it,” Oliver explained.

Santae Tribble spent 26 years in prison after an FBI expert said the evidence of his hair at the crime scene was rock solid. It was not. The reality was that none of the hairs found came from the same source.

ADVERTISEMENT

To make matters worse, many labs have relationships with law and that can allow bias into the findings. “They are supposed to be neutral,” not part of the “team” fighting for officers, Oliver went on. “If a referee started participating in a team’s end-zone celebration, you’d have some serious f*cking questions.”

Texas is one state Oliver says is leading the way on “junk” science used as evidence. The problem is so prevalent that the National Commission on Forensic Science was begun to help advise the Justice Department on how to avoid inaccurate science. However, Attorney General Jeff Sessions shut the department down in April.

“We may honestly be actively going backwards on this issue,” and more innocent people will likely be locked up while dangerous killers are free. Oliver said that if the Trump administration has no intention of helping, he had his own version of CSI to explain to people.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch the video below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Jim Jordan was a big fan of the impeachment process before it was directed at Trump: reporter for Ohio news outlet

Published

on

GOP Rep. Jim Jordan (OH) is one of President Trump's most vocal defenders when it comes to the Democrats' impeachment efforts, but according to a news outlet in his home state, he's been an enthusiastic supporter of the impeachment process in the past.

Twice in recent years, Jordan "vigorously sought to impeach a pair of public officials whom he accused of offenses that seem minor in comparison to the accusations against Trump," Cleveland.com's Sabrina Eaton writes.

As Eaton points out, during those times, Jordan described impeachment as an “indispensable power that Congress has for holding government officials accountable.”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump campaign tries to make a pop culture reference — and it instantly backfires

Published

on

President Donald Trump's campaign faltered again as it attempted to make another pop-culture reference.

In the past, the campaign has run into problems when it photoshopped Trump's head on Sylvester Stallone's boxer-body during the film "Rocky," so as to make the president look less obese.

Tuesday, the Trump crew again compared the president to Thanos a.k.a. "The Mad Titan" who wants to kill half of all living things. He ultimately ends up losing when facing "The Avengers."

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1204503645607333888

In the video by the Trump campaign, the Marvel movie is used, delivering Thanos' final speech before he's ultimately killed.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Here are 5 huge lies Republicans are telling about the new report on the Russia probe

Published

on

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's new report on the origins of Crossfire Hurricane, commonly called the Russia investigation, blew up many of the right wing's favorite talking points and conspiracy theories about the FBI. At the same time, it exposed real failures of procedures meant to protect American citizens against undue surveillance and exposed the need for serious law enforcement reforms.

But most Republicans seem unfazed that the report undercuts President Donald Trump's repeated accusations of "treason" and a "witch hunt," and they show no genuine interest in pushing policy to generally make law enforcement more responsible. Instead, they're trying to pin the blame on the Obama administration and bias against Trump, even though these claims actually distract from the genuine problems uncovered.

Continue Reading