Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Trump effect’ has created a ‘partisan garbage fire’ of commentary written at 1st grade reading level: study

Published

on

Children yelling - Shutterstock

The shifting norms of political discussions known as the “Trump Effect” have been widely reported anecdotally, but a new study seeks to quantify the actual impact of worsening political discourse.

The study (PDF) identifies “general trends in the (in)civility and complexity of political discussions occurring on Reddit between January 2007 and May 2017 — a period spanning both terms of Barack Obama’s presidency and the first 100 days of Donald Trump’s presidency.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The study was conducted by Rishab Nithyanand of the Data & Society Research Institute along with Brian Schaffner and Phillipa Gill of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. The study examined Reddit, which is the fourth most visited website in the United States with more than 230 million people using the site each month.

“During Brexit, they just retweeted things in favour of the Leave camp,” Julio Amador Diaz Lopez at Imperial College London’s Business School explained in a release accompanying the study. “In the US election, it was a full blown propaganda campaign, which excited people and fuelled a partisan garbage fire.”

The researchers used the Flesch-Kincaid readability test, which found the political discourse studied had dropped on average from a seventh-grade (age 12) reading level to a first-grade (age 6) reading level over the decade studied.

“The study shows a strong correlation between Trump’s rise in popularity and an increase in offensiveness,” Nithyanad explained. “Elite politicians have a responsibility to remain more civil, because people mimic their behaviour.”

There is also a strong partisan split in the quality of discourse.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Considering only the partisan subreddits, we see that comments had an average readability grade-level between 7.8 (Democratic subreddits) and 7.5 (Republican and Libertarian subreddits) until December 2015, with only marginal variations throughout. During the 2016 Democratic and Republican primaries (January – June 2016), however, there were significant drops in complexity – Democratic and Republican subreddits had an average reading grade-level of 2.6 and 1.9, respectively,” the study notes. “These results suggest that the highly contested intra-party primaries on both sides led to much lower quality of discourse even on partisan subreddits. Since the end of the primaries (June 2016 – May 2017), complexity of discourse in Democratic subreddits improved to a 6.9 grade-level while discourse in Republican subreddits further declined to a 1.1 grade-level.”

“The complexity of discourse in partisan subreddits was at its historical lowest during the 2016 primaries and presidential elections. While the complexity of discourse has recovered in the Democratic subreddits since the election, it has continued to decline to a first grade-level in Republican subreddits,” the study noted.

The change in discourse norms may be a feature of the unique nature of Donald Trump’s presidency.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Specifically, as Trump took office without winning the popular vote and has constantly been under criticism since his inauguration, it may not be particularly surprising that the Republican base feels that their party’s status (and the legitimacy of Trump’s presidency) is under threat,” the study observed. “This would explain why negative partisanship has remained high, even as Republicans control both branches of the federal government.”

“Ultimately, we are able to demonstrate another unfortunate consequence of America’s political polarization – namely, the fact that online political discussions have become remarkably less civil and complex. While these trends are disturbing, we do provide some reason for hope that the situation can improve,” the study noted. “After all, much of our evidence suggests that the degradation in discourse is tied to the rise of Trump. Thus, it is possible that our political discussions may become less offensive when his presence in the limelight fades.”

ADVERTISEMENT

You can read the study here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Things are so bad for Republicans the GOP had to send money to Texas

Published

on

In 2016, then-anti-Trump Republican Sen. Linsey Graham proclaimed, "If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed.......and we will deserve it." It seems his prediction is coming closer to fruition.

Financial reporting reveals that the Republican Party was forced to send $1.3 million to ruby-red Texas as the election nears.

It was something spotted by ProPublica developer and ex-reporter Derek Willis Sunday.

"That's never happened before," he tweeted.

He noted that the Texas GOP raised $3.3 million in August, but nearly half of that came from their national parents.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

What the London ‘Blitz’ reveals about how much pain and tragedy people can handle in 2020

Published

on

It's hard to imagine how 2020 could possibly get worse. "If we lose Betty White," a friend said on a drive to the Supreme Court to lay flowers.

So many Americans have lost friends or family members to COVID-19. Thousands of Americans survived the virus only to desperately needed organ transplants and forever will struggle to breathe the way they once did. Others are still suffering without smell or taste even three months after having the virus. Millions of Americans are out of work. Debt is stacking up for those trying to survive in the COVID economy. A lack of health insurance can mean hospitalizations from the virus are putting people into bankruptcy.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Stop trying to convince people you’re right — it will never persuade anyone: expert

Published

on

MSNBC host Joshua Johnson noted that this year has been full of strife, with Americans having a lot to stand up about. Whether the slaying of unarmed Black men and police brutality, or healthcare, and the coronavirus, Americans are lining up to protest.

Johnson asked if people try to start tough conversations, how do they keep it productive, and when it's time to give up. In her book, We Need to Talk, Celest Headlee explains tools that people can use to have productive conversations about tough issues that help move the needle.

"Keep in mind that a protest isn't a conversation, right?" she first began. "That's a different kind of communication. The first thing is that our goal in conversations is not always a productive one. In other words, oftentimes, we go into these conversations hoping to change somebody's mind or convince them that they are wrong. You're just never going to accomplish that. There's no evidence. We haven't been able to -- through years and years of research we haven't been able to find evidence that over a conversation somebody said, 'You're right, I was completely wrong.' You've convinced me. So, we have to stop trying to do that. We have to find a new purpose for those conversations."

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage.  Help us deliver it.  Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE