Fox News guest host Geraldo Rivera on Tuesday suggested that a bomber targeted Austin, Texas because it is one of the most liberal cities in the state.
Hours after the bomber allegedly blew himself up, Rivera speculated that he may have chosen Austin because it is a sanctuary city or because the number of liberals who live there.
“One point I want to make about Austin, Texas particularly because I believe there is in the location, in the nexus of these crimes, there is some explanation,” Rivera said. “Austin is not only the capitol of Texas, it’s also the hub of the main campus of the University of Texas. It is a dot of deep blue in a sea of red. A very liberal town. They want to keep Austin weird — that’s one of their slogans.”
“So there was a lot of attention to this liberal island in a conservative sea,” he continued. “That might have had something to do with his choice of targets and the timing of these.”
Rivera’s analysis did not go over well with Fox News viewers, who lashed out on Twitter.
OMG @GeraldoRivera seriously “maybe the bomber had a beef against sanctuary cities?!” 🤨 You have one-track mind. Don’t know how our genius #POTUS can be friends with you. Such a simple mind 🤦🏼♀️#AustinBombings #BREAKING
— LatinaForTrump ❤️🇺🇸 (@latinafortrump_) March 21, 2018
very sad that Gerardo Rivera, in the fair and balance channel and before any investigation is done, suggested that the bomber maybe choose Austin since there there is a ,blue, liberal college,
— Claudia Clara Maria (@nassurelo) March 21, 2018
geraldo making assumptions about dead suspect is about as credible as his past incorrect assumptions, let L.E. complete investigation, we want facts not guesses
— A.Edward (@greencane654) March 21, 2018
Aaaaaaand @GeraldoRivera just suggested bomber might have been attacking 'Austin Liberals' for their liberalness.
— Brett Fleming (@LCCrusader) March 21, 2018
Very irresponsible of @GeraldoRivera to speculate on motive like that. The country is so racially/politically divided, and snap judgements like that, presented as almost fact, can be dangerous. @foxandfriends #AustinBombings
— MMHRN (@mmhsweeps) March 21, 2018
Geraldo basically blaming a conservative for the bombing. Who knows? Just wait and see what this delusional person was up to. #AustinBombings
— JMatt (@jmatteso1303) March 21, 2018
. @FoxNews Did Geraldo just insinuate a Trump supporter did this to target a blue city? 😳
— 🍀☘️TrumpsAmericaPhD (@irshroz) March 21, 2018
Geraldo Rivera now inferring the bomber was former military and ultra right wing. Says bomber may have been motivated by the left nature of Austin
Except it began during SXSW and he never bombed that
— ThunderB (@ThunderB) March 21, 2018
I'm a little perplexed once again. Geraldo Rivera is saying a white male may have been getting revenge on the City of Austin for being a sanctuary city. What is wrong then with saying an illegal brown male drives drunk and kills an entire family or innocent white person?
— JRichards (@JERichards67) March 21, 2018
Watch the video below from Fox News.
WATCH: Protesters celebrate as Chase Bank was set ablaze during Portland protests
Trump alerts ‘active-duty U.S. military police’ for possible deployment to Minnesota: report
President Donald Trump's administration is contemplating using active-duty U.S. troops in an attempt to quell the protests in Minneapolis, the Associated Press reported early Saturday morning.
As unrest spread across dozens of American cities on Friday, the Pentagon took the rare step of ordering the Army to put several active-duty U.S. military police units on the ready to deploy to Minneapolis, where the police killing of George Floyd sparked the widespread protests," the AP reported.
"Soldiers from Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Drum in New York have been ordered to be ready to deploy within four hours if called, according to three people with direct knowledge of the orders. Soldiers in Fort Carson, in Colorado, and Fort Riley in Kansas have been told to be ready within 24 hours. The people did not want their names used because they were not authorized to discuss the preparations," the AP explained.
John Roberts joins liberals as Supreme Court rejects challenge to Newsom’s COVID-19 limits on California church attendance
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday rejected an emergency appeal from the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, California. The San Diego area church tried to challenge the state's limits on attendance at worship services:
The church argued that limits on how many people can attend their services violate constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and had been seeking an order in time for services on Sunday. The church said it has crowds of 200 to 300 people for its services.