Highlighting in the most “horrifying” and “insane” manner the way that many states disenfranchise convicted or former felons, a Texas judge is sending a woman to jail for five years for unknowingly casting an illegal vote in the 2016 election when she was on probation.
Crystal Mason, a 43-year-old mother of two, finished serving a three-year sentence in 2016 for tax fraud, shortly before the presidential election. She was living under community supervision on Election Day, and authorities including her probation officer hadn’t told her that she was not legally allowed to vote.
“They tell you certain things like you can’t be around a felon, you can’t have a gun. No one actually said, ‘Hey, you can’t vote this year,'” Mason told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram when she was indicted earlier this month.
A judge in Tarrant County, Texas, would not be swayed by Mason’s explanation that when she arrived at her polling place, an election worker was helping her with a provisional ballot so she didn’t carefully read the fine print at the top. The print stated that former felons must complete their probation before they can vote in Texas.
In Texas and elsewhere, it is confusing for a person involved in the criminal justice system to know if, when and how they can vote. This story illuminates this problem. https://t.co/AsKPVoeAz1
— Legal Defense Fund (@NAACP_LDF) March 30, 2018
“You think I would jeopardize my freedom? You honestly think I would ever want to leave my babies again? That was the hardest thing in my life to deal with,” Mason told the Star-Telegram. “Who would—as a mother, as a provider—leave their kids over voting?”.
This Crystal Mason story is horrifying, just insane.https://t.co/UHJWoCq6HF
— John Lurie (@lurie_john) March 30, 2018
This is an absolutely INSANE sentence.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) March 29, 2018
Mason is the second person in just over a year who has been sentenced to several years in prison over inadvertent illegal voting. Rosa Maria Ortega was given an eight-year sentence last year after she voted in 2012 and 2014, also in Tarrant County. She told a judge that she hadn’t realized she couldn’t vote as a legal permanent resident.
Ryan Cooper, national correspondent for The Week, compared the case of Mason, a black woman, with that of a white woman in Iowa who deliberately tried to cast two votes for President Donald Trump.
— ryan cooper (@ryanlcooper) March 30, 2018
Here’s the thing. Try and imagine a reality in which this happens to, oh, say, me. It’s so far fetched that they’d put my white ass in jail for this, it boggles the goddamn mind https://t.co/ycQgZ9suAF
— john r stanton (@dcbigjohn) March 30, 2018
Trump and other Republicans have aggressively pushed a false narrative about rampant in-person voter fraud, despite the fact that such cases are extremely rare. Cases of votes cast by people who are not U.S. citizens made up less than .0002 percent of votes analyzed by the Brennan Center for Justice in a 2007 nationwide study.
Mason’s attorney is planning to appeal the judge’s sentence.
Trump’s impeachment is a pivotal moment in our history but the press still covers it like a horse race
I wrote yesterday that political journalists’ pervasive cynicism led to some odd analyses concluding that Wednesday’s first day of public impeachment hearings had been a dull affair, and how this narrative ultimately benefited Donald Trump. The following post adds to that piece.
Only those blinded by cynicism or partisanship could view the impeachment of Donald Trump as anything but a profoundly dramatic and potentially pivotal moment in our country’s history.
Here’s why Republican impeachment theatrics — as buffoonish as they are — serve a purpose for the GOP
Liberal and progressive pundits — and some Never Trump conservatives as well — have been highly critical of the silly, buffoonish theatrics that Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Rep. Devin Nunes of California and other far-right House Republicans brought to the first public testimony in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. But then, Jordan and Nunes weren’t trying to win over liberals, progressives or anti-Trump conservatives on Wednesday, November 13, when they aggressively attacked the testimony of two diplomats: Ambassador William B. Taylor (top U.S. ambassador to Ukraine) and the U.S. State Department’s George P. Kent (deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs). They were playing to Trump’s hardcore MAGA base, pushing emotional buttons rather than relying on substance.
Fox News creates an alternative reality and portrays impeachment hearings as a Trump victory over hapless nerds
There was a lot of talk on Thursday about the theater criticism of the impeachment hearings coming from some quarters of the mainstream media. Press Watch's Dan Froomkin wrote a must-read piece here at Salon taking them to task for trivializing the event and creating the impression among many people who didn't watch the live testimony that it was boring and worthless. This is another example of the media's insatiable need for drama, explaining once again how Donald Trump, a carnival sideshow act if ever there was one, wound up in the White House.