Quantcast
Connect with us

The legal process required for phone monitor shows how Michael Cohen is in deep trouble: ex-federal prosecutor

Published

on

Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti on Thursday explained how news that Donald Trump’s longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen was wiretapped prior to his FBI raid implies the government thinks he’s guilty of a crime.

“What does news that Michael Cohen was wiretapped tell us about the investigation of him?” the former prosector mused. “Short answer: A lot.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mariotti explained in layman’s terms that the federal government obtains wiretaps when investigating “ongoing criminal activity.” To obtain one, he wrote, “investigators had to convince a judge that Cohen would use the phone to communicate” about any criminal activity he planned on partaking in within the 30-day window of the wiretap.

Wiretapping is different from a search warrant, the legal analyst continued, based on the time frame investigators are looking into: search warrants deal with past crimes, while wiretaps are obtained to get information on crimes a subject plans on committing in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Mariotti went on to explain that when prosecutors don’t acquire wiretaps, they instead use “cooperators” to get information about a crime the subject is planning to commit. The knowledge that Cohen was wiretapped means investigators proved to a judge that Cohen was likely speaking to others involved in the criminal activity.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

“Wiretaps are difficult to get,” the former prosecutor continued. “A normal wiretap has to be approved by a supervisor at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, then by special attorneys at the Justice Department, then by a Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and then by a judge. This one certainly got additional scrutiny.”

Mariotti went on to elaborate on the uniqueness of the Cohen wiretap, noting that “it is highly unusual to wiretap an attorney’s phone because so many of the conversations could be privileged.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Noting that wiretaps are typically at the “covert” or non-publicized stage of an investigation, Mariotti wrote that news of the wiretap makes the early April FBI raid of Cohen’s hotel room, home and office all the more interesting.

“Prosecutors had to know that if they executed the search warrants, Cohen would be much less likely to talk on the phone about crime going forward,” he wrote. “So why ruin their wiretap? Either they already had enough evidence to make their case, or they thought he would destroy evidence.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Whatever the government’s plan was, the former prosecutor wrote, “is very bad news for Cohen.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“So who told NBC News about the existence of the wiretap?” he mused. “My guess is either Cohen’s camp or Trump’s camp. The existence of the wiretap may have been revealed to them by prosecutors, and they could have reason to leak.”

UPDATE: NBC News posted an update to this story saying that three senior officials dispute the claim. They said that the feds monitored Cohen’s phones through merely a log of calls called a “pen register,” not through wiretaps.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

GOP Sen. Ron Johnson: ‘My guess’ is John Bolton is telling truth about Trump and Ukraine

Published

on

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), who once personally lobbied President Donald Trump to release the hold on military aid to Ukraine, seemed to give former national security adviser John Bolton some credibility while talking with reports on Monday.

Politico's Kyle Cheney reports that Johnson said that "my guess is John Bolton tells the truth," although he said he still wanted to hear the Trump administration's full case and also questioned the "exquisite" timing of the leak about Bolton's upcoming book, in which he reportedly says Trump told him he was holding up military aid to Ukraine until it agreed to launch an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Cat is out of the bag’: Trump supporter Byron York reverses and says GOP must allow Bolton impeachment testimony

Published

on

The Washington Examiner's Byron York has long been sympathetic to President Donald Trump. He has repeatedly defended the president's conduct in Ukraine and attacked the Democratic case. Just a week ago, he penned a column criticizing the idea that Trump has been less cooperative in the impeachment trial than President Bill Clinton. And in particular, he has opposed Democratic demands for former National Security Adviser John Bolton to be called to testify against the president, saying, "if anything is covered by executive privilege, it would be the president's private conversations with his national security adviser about issues of foreign policy and national security."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Mitt Romney: GOP senators ‘increasingly likely’ to call John Bolton to testify in impeachment trial

Published

on

John Bolton's book bombshell may have broken President Donald Trump's grip on the Republican Party.

The former national security adviser's forthcoming book "The Room Where It Happened" claims Trump explicitly tied Ukraine aid to an investigation of Joe Biden, and GOP senators are publicly saying they want him to testify during the impeachment trial.

“I think it’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton," said Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT).

.@SenatorRomney tells reporters just now: “I think it’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton.”

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image