Fox News' Shep Smith shaken by toddlers suffering trauma in migrant camps: 'They can't even say their parents names'
June 26, 2018
For customer support issues contact
support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to
corrections@rawstory.com.
Stories Chosen For You
Yusef Salaam, one of the five New York teens wrongfully convicted and imprisoned for the 1989 rape of a jogger in Central Park, issued a brief statement following Thursday's criminal indictment of former U.S. President Donald Trump—who called for bringing back the state's death penalty to execute the defendants and never apologized after they were cleared.
Salaam tweeted: "For those asking about my statement on the indictment of Donald Trump—who never said sorry for calling for my execution—here it is: Karma."
Trump spent $85,000—over $200,000 today—on a full-page ad that ran in all four of New York's major newspapers calling for the restoration of capital punishment so that the Central Park Five could be executed.
The ad read, in part:
Mayor [Ed] Koch has stated that hate and rancor should be removed from our hearts. I do not think so. I want to hate these muggers and murderers. They should be forced to suffer... Yes, Mayor Koch, I want to hate these murderers and I always will... How can our great society tolerate the continued brutalization of its citizens by crazed misfits?
The five Black and Latino teens—Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana, Korey Wise, and Salaam—were beaten and coerced by New York City police into falsely confessing to the rape. They spent years behind bars for the horrific crime that they did not commit.
Salaam, who was 15 years old when his life was upended, was imprisoned for six years and eight months before his exoneration.
In a 2019 interview with the BBC, Salaam—who is now a motivational speaker—said that "I look at Donald Trump, and I understand him as a representation of a symptom of America."
"We were convicted because of the color of our skin. People thought the worst of us," he added. "And this is all because of prominent New Yorkers—especially Donald Trump."
In a statement, National Action Network founder and president Rev. Al Sharpton said that "it's not lost on those of us who were there in 1989 that Donald Trump will likely walk into the same courthouse where the Exonerated 5 were falsely convicted for a crime they did not commit."
\u201cREV. AL SHARPTON RESPONDS TO REPORTS OF PENDING TRUMP INDICTMENT\u201d
— NationalActionNet (@NationalActionNet) 1680216860
"Let's not forget that it was Donald Trump who took out full-page ads calling for these five Black and Brown young men to get the death penalty," Sharpton continued. "This is the same man who's now calling for violence when he has to go through the same system. The same man will have to stand up in a courtroom and see firsthand what the criminal justice system is like."
"All I can say is, what goes around comes around," he added.
CONTINUE READING
Show less
In a political bombshell, Donald Trump has been indicted by a New York grand jury, the first ever serving or former US president to face criminal charges.
Here's what happened on Thursday and what is expected to happen next:
Criminal charges
The grand jury, which meets in secret, voted to indict the 76-year-old former Republican president following an investigation led by the Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat.
While the indictment remains under seal, the charges against Trump are believed to relate to hush money payments made to porn star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
The grand jury, which has been meeting since January, indicted Trump after hearing testimony from a number of witnesses.
Among those who testified was Trump's ex-personal lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen, who has admitted arranging a $130,000 payment to Daniels to buy her silence about an affair she had with Trump in 2006.
Trump was invited to testify in person but declined.
Surrender
Bragg said his office had been in touch with Trump's attorneys to "coordinate his surrender" for arraignment in New York at a future date.
At an arraignment, a defendant is presented with the charges facing them and generally enters a plea.
A judge then decides whether they should be released on bail or taken into custody.
Extra security has been in place for days around the Manhattan courthouse where Trump is expected to make his first appearance.
CBS News, citing Trump's defense team, said the plan is for the former president to surrender early next week. CBS said the Secret Service would be in charge of the arrangements.
Prior to an arraignment, a defendant has their fingerprints and a mugshot taken.
Extradition
Trump, who insists he is "completely innocent," could refuse to surrender to the New York authorities, forcing them to seek his extradition from his Florida residence.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a potential Trump rival for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, said that his state would "not assist in an extradition request."
Legal experts said any attempt to fight extradition would at best result in a delay and Trump would eventually have to appear in New York to face the charges.
- Next judicial steps -
Once Trump is arraigned and enters a plea, there will be a series of preliminary court hearings to set a date for a trial and decide on witnesses and evidence.
A defendant can avoid going to trial by entering into a plea agreement with prosecutors, in exchange for a lighter sentence, for example.
Given Trump's proclamations of innocence that is unlikely.
2024 White House candidacy
Trump can -- and undoubtedly will -- pursue his 2024 White House campaign despite facing criminal charges.
Nothing in the Constitution prevents someone from running for president while facing charges, and even a conviction would not bar them from the nation's highest office.
The 14th Amendment does prohibit anyone who has "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding elected office.
The House of Representatives impeached Trump for "incitement of insurrection" for the January 6, 2021 attack on Congress by his supporters, but he was acquitted by the Senate.
A special counsel is currently looking into Trump's role in the January 6 assault on Congress and the former president could still potentially face charges on that front.
© Agence France-Presse
CONTINUE READING
Show less
On Wednesday, I said Josh Hawley, of Missouri, is one of the most dangerous men in the United States Senate. With comrades, he’s paving the way for outlawing what he calls “hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.”
By that, he does not mean rhetoric of the kind that moved 175 former prosecutors to sign an open letter denouncing Donald Trump’s attempts to intimidate the Manhattan district attorney into backing down from his investigation of a hush-money scheme involving the former president. Trump spent all the previous week blasting Alvin Bragg using “increasingly incendiary rhetoric,” the prosecutors said. He referred to Bragg, , Manhattan’s first Black district attorney, as an “animal” and a “racist,” the implication being that he’s targeting Trump because he’s rich and white.
No, the “hateful rhetoric that leads to violence” that Josh Hawley is talking about is the kind rooted in liberal values and democratic politics, both of which are used by marginalized Americans in raising hell publicly until a majority comes around to their way of thinking. This kind of rhetoric found its most recent flowering the wake of George Floyd’s murder by a white cop, an event that sparked a national reckoning on the fact of white power.
READ MORE: 'I was bullied, intimidated, and coerced': Former Fox News producer offers damning rebuke of network
So the kind of “hateful rhetoric that leads to violence” that Josh Hawley is talking about is the kind that outpeople, as I call them, have used in every struggle for individual liberty since the founding of the republic. Persuasion is the means. Securing equity and justice is the goal. The most recent cohort in this history has been trans people raising hell for trans rights.
That’s where Josh Hawley’s “hateful rhetoric that leads to violence” comes in. The perpetrator of Monday’s shooting massacre in Nashville was Audrey Hall, who the city’s police chief said is transgendered. Josh Hawley wants his audience to believe that the rhetoric that brought people’s attention to the fact of trans people, as well as their unfulfilled rights, is also responsible for a crime that left three 9-year-olds and three adults shot to pieces.
By setting trans rights in the context of a shooting massacre, Josh Hawley turns ordinary liberal values and normal democratic politics into extremist ideologies that are akin to jihadism. They inflame true believers into getting what they want through terrorism of other acts of violence. A shooting massacre featuring a monster like that gives greater credence, not that it needed any, to Trump’s allegation of being a victim of a racist witch hunt.
According to Josh Hawley, a government of the people, whether federal or state, must act to protect the people against “hateful rhetoric that leads to violence.” That such government action would also shut down Americans who won’t stop raising hell for their rights and freedoms is beside the point.
That’s dangerous.
But there’s another aspect I didn’t get to Wednesday.
There are two layers of danger that reinforce each other. On the one hand are politicians like Josh Hawley and Donald Trump, who demonize from outpeople for the purposing of outlawing “hateful rhetoric that leads to violence” arising from an “ideology” (trans rights) that’s commits murder.
On the other hand are all those listening to people like Josh Hawley and Donald Trump, who already believe outpeople are undeserving of the same rights and privileges they enjoy, who already believe violence against outpeople is acceptable while violence against inpeople is intolerable.
One of these does not believe a word they say. They don’t think trans people are monsters. They don’t think trans people are terrorists. These are highly educated people who understand the world they live in, including the ever-present tinderbox of white power that’s always waiting to be lit by somebody who’s greedy, amoral and daring enough to light the match.
While it’s debatable whether the other group believes a word they hear, it’s not debatable that some of them do, and that some of them wonder what their comrades are waiting for. Somebody’s got to do something about these murdering perverts. If the government or law enforcement can’t, on account of these Democrats always yammering about the rights of these murdering perverts, somebody’s got to take the law into their own hands.
Which is why Josh Hawley is really dangerous.
He knows what he’s doing. He knows that, in rightwing politics, shooting massacres are not a problem in and of themselves. It depends on who’s getting massacred. If it’s all these outpeople raising hell, trying to persuade a democratic majority to come around to their way of thinking, so be it.
As I said on Tuesday, “mass death, or the threat of mass death, is another way in rightwing politics to control people.” I added: “The people with the most guns are the people most in control. The right to bear arms is the right of God’s people to force outpeople to stay where they belong.”
Trump’s fortunes are probably fading.
But a man like Josh Hawley is only getting started.
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Copyright © 2023 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections contact corrections@rawstory.com, for support contact support@rawstory.com.
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}