Quantcast
Connect with us

Maddow reveals ways in which the Saudis and UAE may have worked to help Trump’s 2016 election

Published

on

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow

Nestled in a New York Times report about President Donald Trump’s billionaire buddy Tom Barrack and his close ties to leaders in the Middle East, is a nugget of information that MSNBC host Rachel Maddow latched onto Wednesday evening.

The report on Barrack details the ways in which he liaised with former campaign manager Paul Manafort and those leaders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Maddow cited the first report of an indication of the investigation, which detailed a “previously unknown meeting that happened in Trump Tower in August 2016 ahead of the election. In that meeting Donald Trump Jr. reportedly met with somebody who’s now a cooperating witness in the special counsel investigation, someone who’s been granted immunity reportedly for his cooperation.”

George Nader told Don Jr. that the Saudis and UAE were eager to help his father win the 2016 election. Nader was then “quickly embraced as a close ally by Trump campaign advisors,” Maddow explained.

Wednesday, Maddow said that the second major indication of possible involvement by the Saudis and UAE in the election came from the revelation that Barrack was “the bridge between Trump and the crown princes of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.” The report cited people familiar with the matter.

“Manafort has since been indicted by the special prosecutor investigating Russian meddling in the presidential election,” The Times reporter David Kirkpatrick wrote. “The same inquiry is examining whether the Emiratis and Saudis helped sway the election in Mr. Trump’s favor — potentially in coordination with the Russians, according to people familiar with the matter. Investigators have also asked witnesses about specific contributions and expenses related to the inauguration, according to people familiar with those interviews.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Really?” she asked, rhetorically. “Not just Russia but Russia and the UAE and Saudi Arabia potentially working together to do that.”

Maddow asked Kirkpatrick if he knew that special counsel Robert Mueller had turned his investigation to look at other countries and their potential involvement in the 2016 election. Specifically, Mueller is reportedly looking at the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Kirkpatrick explained that the Nader information comes from the emails exposing a secret Jan. 2017 meeting on the Seychelles islands between Blackwater founder Erik Prince and Russian oligarch Kirill Dmitriev. The secret meeting was aimed to create a communications channel between the White House and the Kremlin. Prince then lied about it when questioned by Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think we know for sure that that meeting has caught the interest of the special prosecutor and that they’re asking questions about Nader, about Nader’s connections with Russia, about efforts by the UAE and possibly Saudi Arabia to try to help the Trump campaign and whether or not there was some communication there,” Kirkpatrick told Maddow.

All of those findings have nothing to do with Tom Barrack, however, The Times reporter explained.

“He enters the picture earlier trying to build a bridge as you say between the Trump campaign and the Arab leaders,” he continued. “When we were doing the Nader reporting, I wondered how is it the UAE and Saudi Arabia can feel so positive about Trump that they would send this emissary to the Trump campaign to offer their help. Some of that becomes clear when you look at the communications that Tom Barrack had with the ambassador.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He went on to say that Trump never met with the Arab leaders, but that Barrack did all of the legwork to bring the two together and build the relationships between the two.

“There’s an interesting part of this where Tom Barrack tries to set up a meeting between Paul Manafort and then the deputy crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman,” Kirkpatrick said. “It was discussed between Yousef Al Otaiba, the Emirati ambassador, and Tom Barrack as a prelude bringing MBS (as he’s known) together with the candidate. It’s a rather advanced effort to try to hook up the campaign with Saudi Arabia and specifically with MBS at a time he wasn’t yet the successor to the thrown. When he was still making his move.”

He said the meeting never happened but from the emails it sounded as if Manafort was close, saying things like “let’s do it Friday, to avoid the press.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Even though the meeting didn’t happen, the work that Tom Barrack did to sell the campaign on the Saudis and the Saudis on the campaign, had some benefit,” he said. “We saw them change the Republican Party platform to help the Saudis. And we saw them saying ‘Look we’re moderating this policy on a Muslim ban, don’t worry it’s not as bad as it seems.'”

Watch the full explanation and interview below:

ADVERTISEMENT

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from billionaires and corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. Unlike other news sites, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.



Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Rachel Maddow reveals 9 major reasons so many Democrats are running against Trump in 2020

Published

on

The host of "The Rachel Maddow Show" on MSNBC listed nine major reasons Democrats are running to take on President Donald Trump in 2020.

"As we close in on the third round of Democratic presidential primary debates, the acute angle of the funnel that the candidates are going through right now is starting to pinch a little bit," Maddow noted.

"I think it’s fair to say that the Democratic Party knew that a lot of people were going to get into this presidential primary to try to earn the right to challenge this incumbent president. Right? It’s not rocket science to figure that out," she continued. "It’s nothing personal about the president."

Continue Reading

Facebook

WATCH: Joy Reid warns Trump is going to ‘tank the U.S. economy — just before Christmas’

Published

on

MSNBC's Joy Reid warned President Donald Trump is going to 'tank' the United States economy.

Reid was interviewed by Chris Hayes on a broadcast of "All In" with a live studio crowd on Friday.

"This new round of tariffs would increase everything," Reid noted. "Something like 70% of what you buy in Walmart is sourced from China."

"And so if you raise the prices — that’s tariffs are -- by 25% or 30%, you are essentially going to tank the U.S. economy just before Christmas," she warned.

"Kicking brown people out of the country is expensive," she said.

"If you're willing to go broke, if you are willing to lose your farm, willing to lose everything because you hate brown people so much you are willing to literally kill yourself economically for it," she said.

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Democrat mocks Trump for being the wrong person to lead the charge on mental illness

Published

on

President Donald Trump may not be the best person to focus on mental health in America, a Democratic senator explained on MSNBC.

"All In" host Chris Hayes interviewed Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) before a live studio audience.

The two discussed Trump's focus on mental health instead of gun control following the latest mass shootings in America.

"I saw this article about the mental health proposal being floated. I gotta say, the more I hear him talk about mental health, the more freaked out I get, honestly," Hayes explained. "It seems like — like sci-fi dystopia. They want to do something like DARPA, the notorious Pentagon research association called HARPA. It’s going to develop 'breakthrough technologies with high specificity and sensitivity for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric violence...The document goes on to list a number of widely used technologies it suggests could be used to help collect data, including Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo and Google Home."

Continue Reading
 
 

Thank you for whitelisting Raw Story!

As a special thank you, from now until August 31st, we're offering you a discounted rate of $5.99/month to subscribe and get ad-free access. We're honored to have you as a reader. Thank you. :) —Elias, Membership Coordinator
LEARN MORE
close-link
close-image