Last week’s nine-hour and 41-minute hearing with FBI counter-intelligence deputy Peter Strozk was an exercise in futility, according to one NBC News political reporter.
During a Sunday MSNBC panel discussion, Mike Memoli explained that Republicans had a goal of trying to invalidate special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation by discrediting the basis by which the investigation began. They hoped to paint Strzok as overtly-partisan and out to stop President Donald Trump from being elected.
“But you wouldn’t know it from the questions they asked,” Memoli said. “They all asked questions about the text messages, which are hard to defend and Peter Strzok tried to apologize for them.”
The problem that the GOP members on the committee ran into, however, was that they also wanted to impress one person in particular, who was likely watching the hearing: Trump.
“I thought a Democratic staffer had an interesting point,” he continued. “They all want to be part of the highlight reel on Fox News.”
When it comes to whether or not the Republicans changed the public perception of the Muller investigation, however, Memoli said that the GOP didn’t “do themselves any favors in terms of the public.”
In another part of the conversation, Daily Beast reporter Betsy Woodruff noted that Strzok was the first person to publicly say that the Christopher Steele dossier was not the thing that sparked the investigation into Trump and Russian involvement in the 2016 election.
The Republican House committee found that George Papadopoulos was the spark that ignited the fire. She explained that even Nunes’ HPSCI investigation didn’t rule out the dossier as the source of opening the investigation.
Jeremy Bash, who once served as the chief of staff to the CIA and Department of Defense, reiterated that Strzok hasn’t been part of the Mueller investigation for over a year and a half. As such, the investigation as it is known today, cannot be linked to the FBI agent.
Watch the full discussion below:
‘A truly horrifying pick’: Fury over Trump nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to SCOTUS
President Donald Trump's nomination Saturday of Seventh Circuit Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court sparked a chorus of outrage from Democrats and progressive groups who warned her confirmation could shift the court to one that would dismantle the Affordable Care Act and "work to preserve the Trump agenda for decades to come."
38 days until the election, Americans are already casting their ballots, and Republicans are making a blatant power grab.
Chuck Todd shreds GOP senator for making rules ‘out of thin air’: ‘The party looks like a bunch of hypocrites’
Chuck Todd, host of NBC's Meet the Press, on Sunday told Republican Sen. Roy Blunt (MO) that his party "looks like a bunch of hypocrites" because they are set to nominate President Donald Trump's Supreme Court pick in an election year.
Following Trump's nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the high court, Todd reminded Blunt that Republicans had blocked former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nomination because it was an election year.
"You have no qualms about doing this before the election?" Todd asked. "You've seen, polling is pretty overwhelming on this issue. A large majority of the American public do not believe this president before the election should make this pick and it should be whoever wins the election."
Tom Cotton cornered by CNN’s Tapper over Trump’s threat to not hand over power if he loses in November
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) was put on the spot on Sunday morning during his appearance on CNN when "State of the Union" host Jake Tapper pressed him over Donald Trump's suggestion he won't peacefully step down if he loses the election.
With Cotton glibly commenting he expected a peaceful transfer of power “in January 2025, after President Trump finishes his second term,” Tapper pressed him about the president's comments.
“You’re not at all disturbed by what he’s saying about if the ballots aren’t counted? " the CNN host asked. "It is really quite alarming to a lot of Republicans his refusal to say, 'of course, if I lose, I will abide by a peaceful transfer of power.'”