Quantcast
Connect with us

How President Donald Trump could be impeached — according to Alan Dershowitz

Published

on

Alan Dershowitz, the famed attorney, constitutional scholar and author of the new book “The Case Against Impeaching Trump,” revealed Monday how the president could be impeached in an interview with Salon.

Given the parameters of the U.S. Constitution, the president’s actions may amount to grounds for impeachment “only if you can demonstrate that he or she has committed a specified crime — treason, perjury, or other high crimes and misdemeanors,” Dershowitz explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

This article was originally published at Salon

However, if you cannot prove such a crime, “impeachment becomes an unconstitutional process.”

Only three U.S. presidents have been subjected to impeachment proceedings: Andrew Johnsonand Bill Clinton were impeached, but acquitted and remained in office; Richard M. Nixon resigned to avoid being impeached.

Johnson “didn’t commit any high crimes or misdemeanors,” while Bill Clinton “committed a low crime in the Oval Office and then testified falsely,” Dershowitz said. But Clinton’s “wasn’t the kind of crime Hamilton and Madison had in mind when they adopted the framework of high crime and misdemeanors,” he argued.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dershowitz believes it is necessary to distinguish between a high crime for impeachment. Although he revealed people are calling him a “Nazi” for defending Trump’s right not to be impeached, Dershowitz said , “If he commits a crime, he’s not going to be able to count on my defense.”

“If he or the next president is impeached for something that isn’t a crime,” Deshowitz added, “I’m going to stand up for him the same way I stood up for Bill Clinton and probably Andrew Johnson . . . I even defended Nixon’s civil liberties, even though I strongly supported his impeachment.”

“He committed impeachable crimes. “He paid hush money, he told his people to lie to government officials, he destroyed evidence,” Dershowitz continued. “Those are crimes – real obstruction of justice – and I would support any president’s impeachment if they committed a misdemeanor or high crime.”

ADVERTISEMENT

For Dershowitz, character does not come into play in impeachment proceedings.

“Where character comes into play is when you vote,” he said. “You vote against somebody who doesn’t have character . . . I voted against Donald Trump, I voted for Hillary Clinton.”

However, some critics of Trump have argued otherwise – that the president’s actions could amount to obstruction of justice and grounds for impeachment – especially after the news broke that former Trump allegedly pressed former FBI Director James Comey to drop an investigation into Michael T. Flynn, his former national security adviser.

ADVERTISEMENT

In November of last year, a half-dozen Democrats introduced five articles of impeachment against President Trump, accusing him of obstruction of justice related to the FBI investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, undermining the independence of the federal judiciary and other offenses.

“Asking FBI to drop an investigation is obstruction of justice,” tweeted Rep. Ted Deutch (D-FL). “Obstruction of justice is an impeachable offense.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But, according to Dershowitz, crimes that Trump could have committed while he was a candidate for office would present a murky situation.

“There’s that middle category (of impeachable offenses) that occurred while he was running,” Dershowitz said. “I believe that if a president gets elected as a result of criminal behavior, then there would be a case to be made that that could be an impeachable offense, even though he wasn’t president.

“The framers never thought about that,” he concluded.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Andrew Yang 2020 — but not for president

Published

on

After the fourth Democratic presidential debate last week, I realized the only enthusiastic endorsement I could make this far out was for Andrew Yang — but not for president. Instead, Yang should lead the Department of Commerce under whomever gets elected. because he has a 21st-century, visionary grasp of economics.

This article first appeared in Salon

American capitalism is a dead man walking, but don’t count on the corporate news media to tell you as the staggering continues before the final collapse. Signs of the existential crisis are as clear as the flaming orange kleptomaniac who occupies the White House. Rest assured, the business press dominated by the Wall Street pyramid builders will tell you that nobody saw it coming. They always do that after a crash comes.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Multiple NSC officials are ‘rolling the dice’ and running to House investigators against Trump’s wishes: Politico reporter

Published

on

Speaking with MSNBC host Jonathan Capehart, Politico Legal Affairs correspondent Josh Gerstein said Donald Trump's troubles may get worse this week as several National Security Council officials will be speaking with congressional investigators against the president's wishes.

Gerstein's reveal caught the MSNBC host by surprise.

"One thing to look forward to later in the week, a couple of NSC national security officials are to be interviewed this week as well," Gerstein stated. "The NSC is the White House, it's part of the White House, right there in the West Wing and the Eisenhower Executive Office building. So I'll be looking to see do those people also take that same approach and go in and give their testimony despite basically a direct marching order not to do that -- that would be an amazing rebuke."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

White supremacists view escalating tensions in small North Carolina town as an opportunity to radicalize armed neo-Confederates

Published

on

Neo-Confederate activists and antiracists clashed briefly in Pittsboro, NC, a town west of Raleigh, on Saturday, when a man wearing a “Trump 2020” hat and a face mask attempted to drive a front-end loader festooned with Confederate flags down a street where the two groups were facing off.

After antiracists blocked the driver, a local man identified as Sam White, neo-Confederate activists spilled into the street demanding that he be allowed to pass. Neo-Confederates, at least one of whom was armed with a holstered pistol, and antiracists engaged in shoving and grabbing before police separated the two groups and cleared the roadway.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image