Quantcast
Connect with us

CNN legal analyst says momentum is building for the Manafort jury — and Trump’s ex-campaign chief may be toast

Published

on

As the jury continues its deliberations, CNN legal analyst Paul Callan explained why things aren’t looking so good for the defendant, former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

Putting himself in the jury’s shoes, Callan discounted the idea that the defense would be able to obtain a partial verdict. “You’re going through all of these complicated charges and every one, you say he’s innocent. There’s sort of a momentum that builds up,” he said. “Then are you going to ding him just on the one last count? Because, you know, maybe it’s a closer call.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“No, I don’t think so,” Callan scoffed, with a tight grin. “I think most juries probably once they’re in that innocent sort of role, they’re going to just check off innocent all the way down. That’s why -I think- this feels like guilty on the other counts.”

Callan admitted that he could understand “how this jury would have struggled with this complex case,” which involved “ten days of testimony, 27 witnesses, over 370 exhibits, and… counts involving income tax evasion, bank fraud, involving offshore banks, banks in Cypriot, implications with Ukraine and other countries.”

Watch the video below.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

John Dean says Gordon Sondland just had his ‘John Dean moment’ by flipping on Trump: ‘The truth has come out’

Published

on

Former White House aide John Dean on Wednesday compared his testimony against President Richard Nixon to the testimony of European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland.

"This has been called by some commentators a John Dean moment," CNN host Jake Tapper noted during a break in the testimony. "And there is no person I can think of who is better qualified to weigh in on that than John Dean."

"Is he the John Dean of this impeachment inquiry?" Tapper wondered.

"His statement certainly caught the Republicans off guard," Dean replied. "They didn't pick away -- just a few little picky points."

Continue Reading

CNN

‘The worst day with the most damning evidence’: CNN’s Tapper explains how Sondland was very bad for Trump

Published

on

European Union ambassador Gordon Sondland's testimony before the House of Representatives' impeachment inquiry on Wednesday generated several startling revelations, including confirmation of an explicit quid-pro-quo deal involving investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden.

CNN's Jake Tapper described Sondland's testimony as " a monumental and historic moment on what may turn out to be the worst day with the most damning evidence for President Trump in the impeachment inquiry."

He then laid out all the ways that Sondland has been very bad news for the president.

"Sondland directly implicated the president in directing the operation to pressure Ukraine," Tapper explained. "Sondland is testifying that there very clearly was a quid pro quo -- this was for a White House visit for the Ukrainians in exchange for an announcement about an investigation into the company Burisma and the Bidens. Now, Sondland later said it became clear to him that the quid pro quo also, he presumed, was tied to the holdup of hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid that Ukraine desperately needed."

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Here are the most important moments from Gordon Sondland’s bomshell impeachment inquiry testimony

Published

on

EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland, a key actor in President Donald Trump's effort to pressure Ukraine for dirt on his political rivals, was in the hot seat Wednesday as Democrats built their case for impeaching the US leader.

Here are some of the key quotes from his opening statement.

- Following Trump's orders -

- "As a presidential appointee, I followed the directions of the president. We worked with (Trump's personal lawyer Rudy) Giuliani because the president directed us to do so.

"We had no desire to set any conditions on the Ukranians. Indeed, my own personal view -- which I shared repeatedly with others -- was that the White House meeting and security assistance should have proceeded without pre-conditions of any kind."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image