Quantcast
Connect with us

GOP humiliated as friend from pro-Kavanaugh TV ads asks to be removed from letter supporting the judge

Published

on

- Commentary

As Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh becomes increasingly imperiled by multiple sexual assault allegations, right-wing dark money groups have gone to bat to try to stem public opposition. One group, Judicial Crisis Network, took out a $1.5 million ad buy last week featuring Louisa Garry, a woman who has known Kavanaugh for 35 years.

“I never thought about doing a TV commercial,” Garry says in the ad. “I’m not involved in politics. I’m a teacher. I’m a coach. I believe that we need to have bright, curious, open-minded, thoughtful, empathetic people who are judges, and I trust that Brett is that person. He’s dedicated to his work, he’s dedicated to his family, he’s of the highest integrity as a person and I believe that he would be a great Supreme Court justice.”

But it seems as though Garry is no longer willing to stand by this glowing endorsement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Following the publication of Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer’s story in The New Yorker about Deborah Ramirez, a classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Yale who alleges he exposed himself to her at an undergraduate party, Garry asked to be removed from a letter of support for the judge.

“I never saw or heard anything like this,” Garry told The New Yorker. “But I cannot dispute Ramirez’s allegations, as I was not present.”

Ramirez was the second woman to come forward, after California psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford, who alleges Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge pulled her into a room and tried to assault her at a suburban house party when she was 15. Ford is scheduled to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.

Kavanaugh has resolutely refused to step aside, and on Monday, he and his wife sat for an interview with Fox News’ Martha MacCallum.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Here’s what really went down with Trump’s Taliban peace talks misadventure

Published

on

Donald Trump is not known for finessing foreign policy but for years prior to his election and during his campaign, he was mostly right about Afghanistan. He called it a “total disaster,” said it was “wasting our money” and that we should leave “immediately.”

It seemed that Trump understood the timeless – if sometimes historically inaccurate - tropes about Afghanistan being the “graveyard of empires” and home to “ungovernable” tribesmen who could outwit and humiliate the British, the Soviets – and us.

Continue Reading

Commentary

The pundit class is freaking out about socialism — and they’re utterly clueless about where politics is headed

Published

on

On Saturday, Jonah Goldberg, the well-known conservative pundittweeted approvingly an article by Jonathan Chait, the well-known liberal pundit. Chait was writing in a mode critics often call “Democrats in Disarray!” He was worried that Joe Biden might be too old to lead a party too far left to be led anywhere next year.

In the aftermath of the 2016 elections, an exotic political theory promoted by the party’s most left-wing flank suddenly gained wide circulation. The appeal of Bernie Sanders proved Democrats were ready to embrace socialism, or at least something close to it; and Donald Trump’s election proved a nominee with extreme positions could still win. These two conclusions, in combination, suggested the party would move as far left as activists preferred at no political cost (all italics mine).

Continue Reading
 

Commentary

The Democrats’ weird quasi-impeachment process is basically as bad as doing nothing

Published

on

House Democrats are finally pursuing an impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump. Or maybe not. It depends on whom you ask, and when. “The House Judiciary Committee on Thursday advanced a resolution that some Democrats say amounts to opening an impeachment inquiry while others say it means nothing,” reported The Huffington Post last week. A day earlier, The New York Times had reported that “the second-ranking House Democrat, Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, was unequivocal: An impeachment investigation of President Trump is not underway.” A day later, he backtracked. On Monday, Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler announced that a hearing scheduled for today would be designated “as an impeachment hearing.”

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image