A row is raging over Australia’s warming-damaged Great Barrier Reef, with firms worried that scientists’ apocalyptic warnings are scaring visitors out of the water.
Every year, more than two million snorkel-wielding tourists head to Australia’s famed coral ecosystem, generating revenues of $4.3 billion (Aus$5.9 billion) and supporting 64,000 local jobs.
But damage done by higher temperatures — which turn patches of the reef ashen white — has threatened to put a break on the number of tourists willing to wrestle their way into a wetsuit.
There was surprise then, when the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre recently published a markedly more optimistic report, heralding “significant signs of recovery” at major dive sites around Cairns and prompting a flurry of upbeat news coverage.
If the report’s findings seemed out of kilter with other studies about the reef, that was by design.
It was part of an effort to show that not all of the Great Barrier Reef is an aquatic wasteland, according to Col McKenzie of tourism industry lobby group AMPTO, which helped carry out the research.
“Overall, are we seeing a drop in visitation because of the negative press, absolutely we are, there’s no doubt about that,” McKenzie told AFP.
He suggested visitor numbers to the reef and nearby islands had dropped by 10 percent in 2017 and were on track to plunge by a further 15 percent this year.
Although government data shows that the number of visitors to the broader region has actually increased, those figures are older and don’t include coral-viewing activities.
McKenzie said it was vital to get the message out that some areas of the massive ecosystem are still teeming with colour and life.
“What people miss with our reef system is… it’s a massive structure,” he said.
His comments are the latest salvo in a battle between ecologists and the tourism industry, as they struggle to come to terms with competing interests and new realities on the reef.
Professor Terry Hughes of James Cook University, who leads the surveys of bleached corals, cautioned that while some damaged coral regain their colour within several months, more badly damaged reefs can take a decade to recover.
“It’s very early days yet,” he told AFP, describing a patchy recovery that makes generalisations difficult.
“Basically we are in year one in the middle of the reef, or year two in the northern reefs, in the decade-long process of recovery.”
The government’s Australian Institute of Marine Science says coral cover has “continued to decline due to the cumulative impacts of multiple, severe disturbances over the past four years”.
The same institute showed that apart from the risk of extreme sea surface temperatures — with some areas more affected, the reef is also grappling with the impacts of farming run-off, development and severe tropical cyclones.
– Conflicting interests –
Even within government there are conflicting interests at play, as well as rolling debates about how best to respond.
Canberra has — so far successfully — urged UNESCO to hold off listing the reef as an endangered World Heritage site, fearing it would have an adverse economic impact and lead to tougher restrictions on local industry.
It has allocated some $1.4 billion to protect the site, but at the same time backed a huge coal project nearby by Indian mining giant Adani and moved away from legislating climate targets under the Paris Accord.
A parliamentary inquiry was recently set up to investigate why former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull gave nearly half a billion dollars to a small business-backed reef charity without a competitive tender process.
Australians also appear divided on damage done to the reef.
Only half of the country thinks that climate change is already causing the destruction of reef, according to an annual Ipsos poll on environmental issues.
Whichever way the political winds blow, scientists like Hughes are determined to document changes to one of the world’s most biodiverse regions.
But that remains a moving target. “It’s a critical recovery period,” Hughes said.
“The unknown, of course, is whether we’ll get another bleaching event, which potentially could come as soon as early next year if we get a heatwave.”
Turkish forces launch attacks on Syrian Christian communities as Trump welcomes Erdogan to the White House
On the same day as the first public hearings in House impeachment inquiry began, President Trump welcomed Turkey's president Recep Tayyip Erdo?an to the White House -- a move that even Senator Mitch McConnell said made him feel a sense of "uneasiness," in light of the fact that Erdogan's forces and proxies are currently sowing chaos and committing atrocities in Syria.
As the White House meeting between the two leaders took place, reports emerged that Turkish forces launched an attack on the predominantly Christian Syrian town of Til Temir.
Room erupts in laughter as Democrat Peter Welch destroys Jim Jordan during impeachment hearing
There was a moment of levity four-hours into the first televised hearing in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the bombastic Freedom Caucus member who was added to the committee at the last moment by Republicans, had argued that the White House whistleblower started the scandal.
"There’s one witness, one witness that they won’t bring in front of us, they won’t bring in front of the American people, and that’s the guy who started it all, the whistleblower," Jordan argued.
Unfortunately for the wrestling coach turned politician, Jordan was followed by Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT).
Trump ignores impeachment to host Turkey’s Erdogan at the White House
President Donald Trump greeted his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the White House for a high-stakes meeting Wednesday that underlined his claim to be ignoring the impeachment drama unfolding simultaneously in Congress.
The two leaders were to hold several hours of meetings, including lunch, before giving a joint news conference.
While Congress listened to evidence against Trump from two diplomats in the impeachment inquiry, the US president met Erdogan on the White House's South Lawn, together with a military honor guard, before heading straight to the Oval Office.