If Errol Morris thought he was about to get an easy ride from what Steve Bannon calls the “Hollywood liberal elite” with his new film “America Dharma”, he had another thing coming.
Journalists after journalist at the Venice film festival pummelled the king of the confessional documentary for giving Donald Trump’s former strategist and alt-right hero a platform.
Usually post-screening press conferences at film festivals are love-ins, with the auteur gently cradled by reporters and critics after bringing their baby into the world.
But in Venice Morris got a kicking, with reporters queueing up to accuse him of falling into the far-right’s trap.
When the reviews fell Thursday the verdict — with a few notable exceptions — was damning.
Variety lacerated Morris for letting Bannon get away with “playing the role of alt-right Teddy bear… It’s hard to escape the feeling that Errol Morris got played,” wrote its critic Owen Gleiberman.
“If you walked into ‘American Dharma’ knowing nothing about Donald Trump’s former adviser you’d probably find him to be a fascinating, compelling, and at times even charming figure. If that sounds like a swipe against the movie, it is.”
– ‘Brazen lies’ unchallenged –
Morris — who has previously put the often reviled architects of the Vietnam and Iraq wars, Robert McNamara and Donald Rumsfeld, under the microscope in the Oscar-winning “The Fog of War” and “The Unknown Known” — never “stands up to Bannon’s most brazen lies”, Gleiberman argued.
The sentiment was shared by the Italian and Spanish press.
Eric Kohn, chief critic of IndieWire, said the film’s ambiguity made it the “most disturbing movie of the year… It’s never clear who has the upper hand.
“Bannon acolytes may not be persuaded to abandon their leader, and everyone else is left wondering if the bad guys have already won,” he said.
That the film was shown on the same day as Paul Greengrass’ highly emotional “22 July”, the story of far right terrorist Anders Breivik’s massacre of 77 people in Norway in 2011, gave an added piquancy to the debate.
Furthermore, Bannon arrived in Venice at the centre of a storm of protest over his inclusion as a speaker at the New Yorker festival.
When the magazine’s editor bowed to pressure and dropped him, Bannon damned it as “a defining moment” from his Venice hotel room.
“David Remnick showed he was gutless when confronted by the howling online mob,” he said.
Morris, too, came out fighting against the “hostile questioning” of his film.
– ‘Ostrich mentality’ –
He declared that an “ostrich mentality” to the rise of the nativist far right was a “very big mistake”.
It was his duty as a journalist to investigate whether a man who comes over as a bookish film buff in the film, is a real danger or just a liberal bogeyman with a “talent for clickbait”.
“Does he really believe in this ideology, or is he just a snake oil salesman, an opportunist, who uses these ideas?” said the filmmaker, a self-confessed New York liberal.
“We learn that there is a deep strain of self-deception in him,” Morris insisted, telling AFP that he found many of Bannon’s ideas “pernicious”.
In the film Bannon even warms to being compared to Lucifer, finishing a quote from Milton’s poem “Paradise Lost”, “Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.”
Morris, 70, said “Bannon wants to destroy the UN, the EU and the euro and to turn it back into a world of warring nation states. It is insane. But given his record in the US, if I were in Europe I’d be worried.
“Do we have no awareness of history in America?” Morris quipped. “Probably we don’t.”
Asked if he was worried the film might help to normalise some of Bannon’s extreme views, the veteran director admitted that “I am still struggling with that… But my answer was not to remain silent. It is nonsense that we should just not talk about it.”
But Gleiberman does not buy that. For him “‘American Dharma’ isn’t investigative filmmaking. It’s a toothless bromance.”
As for Bannon, he likes the film, Morris told AFP. “It is probably not my best review.”
Fox News commentator Sean Hannity appears to be knee-deep in Trump’s Ukraine scandal — despite his denials
Fox News host Sean Hannity raved that he never spoke with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo about ousted Ukrainian Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch after a third witness confirmed the alleged call to impeachment investigators.
David Hale, the undersecretary of State for political affairs, testified under oath that Yovanovitch was the victim of a baseless smear campaign led by Rudy Giuliani, the personal attorney of President Donald Trump, which led to her ouster. According to a transcript of the closed-door deposition released Monday, the smears originally stemmed from the conservative columnist John Solomon, who wrote in The Hill that former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko had claimed that Yovanovitch gave him a “do not prosecute list.” Lutsenko later retracted that claim.
Will Sondland turn on Trump? Watch live coverage of Day 4 of the Trump impeachment hearings
On Wednesday the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence will hold its fourth public impeachment hearing looking into allegations that President Donald Trump abused his office by attempting to pressure Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky into announcing an investigation that would benefit the president politically in return for releasing $400 million in much-needed security aid.
A historian explains why Robert E. Lee wasn’t a hero — he was a traitor
There’s a fabled moment from the Battle of Fredericksburg, a gruesome Civil War battle that extinguished several thousand lives, when the commander of a rebel army looked down upon the carnage and said, “It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it.” That commander, of course, was Robert Lee.
The moment is the stuff of legend. It captures Lee’s humility (he won the battle), compassion, and thoughtfulness. It casts Lee as a reluctant leader who had no choice but to serve his people, and who might have had second thoughts about doing so given the conflict’s tremendous amount of violence and bloodshed. The quote, however, is misleading. Lee was no hero. He was neither noble nor wise. Lee was a traitor who killed United States soldiers, fought for human enslavement, vastly increased the bloodshed of the Civil War, and made embarrassing tactical mistakes.