The campaign of U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz tore into U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke on Friday afternoon, accusing his Democratic challenger of “hypocrisy” for “accepting support from a political action committee at a Washington, D.C. fundraiser, even though he campaigns in Texas against taking any support from political action committees,” per a Cruz news release.
At issue is a fundraiser Thursday in Washington, D.C. that was co-hosted by both the O’Rourke campaign and a political action committee. Since launching his campaign to unseat Cruz last year, O’Rourke has famously promised to accept no contributions from PACs, which are organizations through which ideological, business or labors groups raise and donate money to candidates. The PAC in question is End Citizens United, a group that donates to Democratic candidates and supports changes to the campaign finance system.
“Beto O’Rourke travels all over Texas claiming that PACs are corrupt, and he’s made his alleged rejection of PAC influence a cornerstone of his campaign,” Cruz spokesperson Catherine Frazier said in a statement. “Yet he held a fundraiser hosted by End Citizens United PAC. O’Rourke’s actions do not match his words and Texans need to know that Beto O’Rourke is a candidate who says one thing on the campaign trail then does another in Washington.
O’Rourke spokesman Chris Evans defended the event as in keeping with the candidate’s principles in a statement earlier this week to the Tribune.
“Thursday’s grassroots event is entirely our event — we are hosting it just like we have done with Beers With Beto events across Texas,” Evans wrote. “We pay all the bills and each attendee has gotten a ticket through our campaign as an individual contribution.”
Evans said that End Citizens United PAC “shared our event info with their supporters in the area to help get the word out and encourage people to attend. No one is getting their ticket through them and they have not picked up any of the cost of the event.”
Evans said the situation was similar to other groups backing O’Rourke’s bid against Cruz, who “regularly help to spread the word about what he’s up to and the possible events interested individuals can attend.”
Since his successful run for U.S. Senate in 2012, Cruz has accepted PAC contributions. His re-election campaign’s fundraising network includes two affiliated PACs that have reported raised $4.3 million since last year.
This isn’t the first time Cruz’s camp has charged O’Rourke with hypocrisy over his claim that his campaign isn’t accepting PAC money. Over the summer, the Cruz campaign hammered O’Rourke for accepting bundled contributions from J-Street, a PAC that supports a two-state solution to the conflict in Israel. J-Street has also hosted O’Rourke at fundraising events.
When the issue first flared in July, O’Rourke maintained he kept his pledge.
“The best way to resolve this question that the senator has raised is to go to the Federal Elections Commission website and look at every FEC report that I have filed as a candidate for the House of Representatives and now as a candidate for the United States Senate,” O’Rourke said in a radio interview on The Chad Hasty Show in Lubbock. “And what you will see on the line that asks the amount of contributions from political action committees is zero, and it’s been zero every single quarter we’ve reported, and it’ll be zero when we report that next quarter.”
“So though there are members of J Street that have contributed to this campaign, they have contributed as individuals,” O’Rourke continued. “Their names appear individually with the amount that they donated on our FEC report. So I’m grateful for everyone’s contributions.”
Campaign finance experts interviewed by the Tribune on this front made a distinction between accepting money from a PAC — which O’Rourke has not done — and the more subjective question of getting help from a PAC. On that latter issue, they said, Cruz may have a point.
“There’s no legal standard for what constitutes accepting help from a PAC … so we’re automatically in the realm of opinion,” said Paul S. Ryan, vice president of policy and litigation at Common Cause. “On the one hand, you have a guy who is holding up his promise [to not accept PAC money], but I certainly consider the receipt of contributions bundled by a PAC to be accepting help from a PAC. It’s not the same thing as accepting PAC money, but yeah, it’s accepting help from a PAC.”
“Cruz’s criticism is technically correct in that the PAC gave some help to O’Rourke, but all they did was pass along contributions,” added Brett Kappel, a campaign finance lawyer at Akerman LLP. “They didn’t give PAC money.”
Former Trump officials are increasingly worried about the president’s erratic and outlandish behavior: report
President Donald Trump became the butt of jokes all over the world this week when he offered to purchase Greenland and angrily canceled a visit to Denmark after Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen described the proposal as “absurd.” The headlines, Maggie Haberman and Peter Baker note in a report for the New York Times, sounded like something The Onion would make up — only it really happened. But Haberman and Baker stress that to former Trump Administration officials, the president’s erratic behavior is no laughing matter. And those who have worked with the president, according to Haberman and Baker, are growing increasingly worried about his actions — especially with the 2020 election only 15 months away and the U.S. economy possibly going into a recession.
‘Confused’ Trump pummeled by WSJ for creating economic uncertainty with his tariffs and incoherent tax plans
A clearly exasperated editorial board of the Wall Street Journal took Donald Trump to task in a harsh column, claiming he doesn't seem to know what he is doing when it comes to economics and they are getting tired of his act.
Right from the start, the conservative editors took a shot at the president by beginning: "President Trump isn’t famous for consistency, but his reversal on a new round of tax cuts may be a record. On Tuesday he said he was considering a cut in the payroll tax and indexing capital gains for inflation, but on Wednesday he took it all back."
Native tribes frozen out of controversial plan for Bears Ears Monument
Federal law requires our government to consult with Native American tribes about the Bears Ears monument in southern Utah. But Trump is only giving lip service at best to attempts to the Navajo, Hopi and others about what was once the second-largest national monument in the lower 48 states, before Trump shrunk it by 85%.