Quantcast
Connect with us

Fox News analyst unleashes a flood of examples after host asks how GOP has been uncivil

Published

on

- Commentary

Fox News host Jon Scott on Wednesday asked contributor Marie Harf, a former senior advisor to Secretary of State John Kerry, to answer for Hillary Clinton’s comment that when Democrats “win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again”– and got a lot more than he bargained for.

After fellow panelists harrumphed about Democrats’ bad behavior, Scott turned to Harf and asked, “Can you point to something that has been so uncivil that requires this kind of response?”

“Donald Trump standing on stage at a rally saying he will pay the legal fees of anyone who beats up protestors,” Harf responded without missing a beat. “Look, Donald Trump is not like a model of civility. Let’s be very clear here.”

“Quite frankly I don’t think what Hillary Clinton says or her view on things will determine what happens in 27 days when people go to the polls,” Harf said, pointing out that Clinton isn’t on the ballot this year.

Co-host Sandra Smith cut her off saying, “sounds like you don’t want her representing your party.”

“It doesn’t matter what I want,” shot back Harf. “The fact is she doesn’t. The people that will help us take back the House in the swing districts aren’t talking like Hillary Clinton. They’re talking like candidates that match their districts.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Cory Booker has said he wants people to get in the faces of members of Congress,” said Scott. “That’s not exactly civil.

“I have received my fair share of people screaming at me in public, people sending me threats from the other side,” retorted Harf dismissively, before steering the conversation back to the topic at hand. “My point is that I don’t think voters are watching an interview with Hillary Clinton and Christiane Amanpour and thinking ‘how should I vote in November?’ They’re listening to their districts.”

Watch the video below.

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Commentary

Rudy was the original Trump: How NYC in the ’90s shaped American history

Published

on

Running on a platform of overt racial division and culture-war politics — and aggressively demonizing the most vulnerable members of society — a white male Republican wins a hotly disputed election, in defiance of all conventional wisdom and a rapidly diversifying electorate. He replaces the first black man to hold the office, vowing to turn back to clock to an idealized past.

This article first appeared in Salon.

Once in office, the newly elected leader becomes a uniquely polarizing figure, viewed by some as a hero and savior and by others as a corrupt, racist villain. He thrives on media disputes with his enemies, attacks on freedom of speech, outrageous proposals that will never be enacted and grossly exaggerated claims about his accomplishments.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Is decency a weakness? Here’s what psychiatrist Carl Jung would say about the GOP’s embrace of the dark side

Published

on

Let’s talk about decency.

We are a nation that elected a man who in less than two and a half years has sullied our reputation across the world while here at home enabling our baser instincts to mug and molest our better angels.

The concept of decency is not one he knows or possesses within himself. His lack of it has helped reignite a contagion of hatred and intolerance, ratcheted up by Internet trollery, that largely lay dormant but now spreads once again like a toxin through the body politic.

Because of him this is not an America made great. It is instead a nation struggling with basic human decency, whether at the camps and cages of our southern border or along the corridors of Congress, where too many once rational members have succumbed to the siren call of cynical opportunism and demagoguery.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

The GOP despises the ‘reparations’ hearings because they expose a horrifying secret about capitalism

Published

on

What’s most potentially transformative about Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s proposed bill H.R. 40 to establish a commission to study and develop reparation proposals for African-Americans is the no-holds-barred inquiry it promises.

While the corporate news media zeros in on the clickbate of who might get paid what — and the red-meat racial antagonism it is already engendering — the real power in this essential exercise is the long-overdue accounting.

The bill empowers the Commission “to request the attendance for testimony of such witnesses and the production of such books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers and documents that the Commission considers appropriate” and permits the panel to turn to the “appropriate U.S. District Court to require, by subpoena” compliance with its requests.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

Investigating Trump's henchmen is a full time job, and I'm trying to bring in new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have more stories coming you'll love. Join me and help restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link

Investigating Trump is a full-time job, and I want to add new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have stories coming you'll love. Join me and go ad-free, while restoring the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link