Quantcast
Connect with us

WATCH: Rachel Maddow unveils her new theory on why Trump walks around with toilet paper stuck to his shoe

Published

on

MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow on Wednesday reported on the bombshell New York Times report on President Donald Trump using his iPhone despite being warned both China and Russia are listening to his calls.

“Sometimes there are certain things you want the people around you to go ahead and tell you — even if it’s embarrassing — like if your zipper is down, right? Or if you have spinach in your front teeth,” Maddow noted.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Or if, for Pete’s sake, you are the President of the United States and you are haplessly ascending the stairs with Air Force One with, wait for it … toilet paper [stuck to your shoe],” Maddow joked, playing a hilarious clip of Trump.

Donald Trump boards Air Force One with what appears to be toilet paper stuck to his shoe. Image via screengrab.

The MSNBC candidate said, “I’m willing to float a different theory about the president and the paper stuck to his shoe.”

After recounting the president’s iPhone scandal, Maddow explained her new conclusions.

“If U.S. intelligence and the White House knows he has this problem with China and apparently Russia as well — listening in to his private calls — the president’s staff knows he has this problem, why is he still talking on his private phone?” she asked. “And why tonight are administration officials talking about this to The New York Times?”

ADVERTISEMENT

“They’ve been telling him in private there’s a security issue, he does not care,” she noted. “So now they’re telling him in big, bold letters in the newspaper.”

“In this case, this is them telling him, ‘hey, sir, you’ve got a little spinach in your teeth,’ and he’s like, ‘oh, yeah, get me a poppy seed bagel, see if I can get some of that stuck in there too.'”

“They’re telling him, ‘sir, you have four pieces of Charmin on your left shoe.’ And he’s like, ‘cool, how we get some on the other shoe, think we can get six or eight pieces to stick?'”

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is — this is more than worrying — this is weird, right?” she asked. “How does this get fixed?”

Watch:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘The country got an education’: Nicolle Wallace explains why impeachment could move public opinion

Published

on

MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace offered her analysis after the day of televised hearings in the impeachment inquiry.

Wallace, who served as White House communications director under President George W. Bush, drew upon her experience as a top Republican strategist.

"Listen, I haven’t spent a nanosecond in a courtroom, but I’ve spent my career in the court of public opinion. And if you look at what the Democrats have set out to do and you look at why this has swung public opinion in a way the Mueller probe never did is that they have laid brick on top of brick on top of brick," Wallace explained.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Room erupts in laughter as Democrat Peter Welch destroys Jim Jordan during impeachment hearing

Published

on

There was a moment of levity four-hours into the first televised hearing in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the bombastic Freedom Caucus member who was added to the committee at the last moment by Republicans, had argued that the White House whistleblower started the scandal.

"There’s one witness, one witness that they won’t bring in front of us, they won’t bring in front of the American people, and that’s the guy who started it all, the whistleblower," Jordan argued.

Unfortunately for the wrestling coach turned politician, Jordan was followed by Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT).

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Constitutional law expert Laurence Tribe succinctly debunks Jim Jordan’s defense of Trump

Published

on

Constitutional law expert Laurence Tribe debunked the key defense of President Donald Trump that was offered by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) during the first televised hearing in the impeachment inquiry.

Jordan did not address the fact President Donald Trump solicited foreign election interference in violation of federal law, but attempted to debunk the additional charge that there was extortion/bribery.

The Ohio Republican argued that there could not have been a quid pro quo because the aid was eventually released.

But Tribe, who has taught at Harvard Law for half a century and argued three dozen cases before the United States Supreme Court, fact-checked the congressman who never passed the bar exam.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image