Women earned roughly half the income of men in the United States over a 15-year period, taking into account time off for family or child care, according to a report released on Wednesday, which found the pay gap is far greater than has commonly been assumed.
In an examination of women’s income from 2001 to 2015, the Washington-based Institute for Women’s Policy Research found that women’s income was 51 percent less than men’s earnings, which includes time with no income.
“Much ink has been spilled debating whether the commonly cited measure of the wage gap – that women earn 80 cents for every dollar earned by a man – is an exaggeration due to occupational differences or so-called ‘women’s choices’,” Heidi Hartmann, president of the institute and a co-author of the study, said in a statement.
“But our analysis finds that we have actually been underestimating the extent of pay inequality in the labor market,” Hartmann said.
The study, “Still a Man’s Labor Market,” showed that the wage gap has narrowed since 1968, with women’s inflation-adjusted income rising to an average of $29,000 for the period from 2001 to 2015, compared with $14,000 from 1968 to 1982.
But women are nearly twice as likely as men to take at least one year off work, and they pay a high price for it. Women who left the workforce for a year earned, during their years on the job, an average of 39 percent less than men, the study found.
Companies are likely to pay their employees less, regardless of gender, if they leave their jobs at some point. But women are more often hurt by that pay cut, the study found, because they are more likely to take time off.
With paid family and medical leave and affordable child care, women are more likely to stay in the workforce and earn higher pay, according to the study.
(This story corrects to show women’s income was 51 percent less than men, not 49 percent, in paragraph 2)
Reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis in Los Angeles; Editing by Leslie Adler
WATCH: Bob Woodward grilled on HBO about Trump supporters being disconnected from reality on COVID
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Bob Woodward was taken to task for failing to warn Americans that Donald Trump's public statements on coronavirus were the exact opposite of what he actually believed.
Axios reporter Jonathan Swan interviewed Woodwood on "Axios on HBO" for an episode that aired on Monday.
Swan noted Woodward recorded Trump admitting that COVID was dangerous on March 19th, but instead of immediately warning America by publishing the bombshell, he saved it for his book Rage -- which was published on September 15th.
Woodward claimed that the world already knew the facts on coronavirus by the 19th of March, but Swan pushed back and pointed out that many of Trump's supporters ignore reality and instead trust Trump -- even when his views are not backed up by science or reality.
‘It was all a hoax’: NYT destroys Trump’s claims of business success — in second blockbuster on his taxes
President Donald Trump's tax returns have resulted in a second bombshell story by The New York Times.
"From the back seat of a stretch limousine heading to meet the first contestants for his new TV show “The Apprentice,” Donald J. Trump bragged that he was a billionaire who had overcome financial hardship. 'I used my brain, I used my negotiating skills and I worked it all out,” he told viewers. “Now, my company is bigger than it ever was and stronger than it ever was.' It was all a hoax," the newspaper reported Monday evening.
Trump campaign accused of ‘laundering’ 170 million — companies linked to Brad Parscale are implicated: report
The Trump campaign may be in legal hot water after a new complaint accused the organization of money laundering.
"The Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan campaign finance watchdog group, filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission Tuesday accusing the Trump campaign of “laundering” $170 million through numerous companies, some with connections to former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale," Forbes reported Monday.