Quantcast
Connect with us

The bizarre reason McConnell would rather put off confirming judges than hold a vote to protect Mueller

Published

on

It’s no secret that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) does not like the bipartisan bill put forward in the Senate to prevent President Donald Trump from firing special counsel Robert Mueller.

But how much does he hate it? He hates it so much that he’d rather let Trump’s judicial nominees go unconfirmed for the rest of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

That is the choice McConnell now faces. 22 judicial nominees are currently stuck in the Senate Judiciary Committee because Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is refusing to vote for any of them until the special counsel bill, crafted by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Chris Coons (D-DE), and Cory Booker (D-NJ), is allowed a vote by the full Senate. Without Flake’s approval, Republicans lack a majority on the Judiciary Committee to move them forward.

Confirming far-right judges to the federal bench has been McConnell’s top priority under Trump, and one of the GOP’s only successful endeavors. So far, they have put two men on the Supreme Court, and filled dozens of lower court seats, to the point that one of every six judges on appellate courts is a Trump appointee. Some of these judges are reasonably uncontroversial and have even voted against the GOP on occasion, but a huge number of them are hard-right ideologues and many were hand-picked by the ultraconservative Federalist Society. McConnell knows that the more judges Trump seats, the longer Trump’s legacy will outlast his presidency, in the form of right-wing courtroom decrees.

So why would McConnell be willing to suspend his top agenda item just to disapprove of protecting the Russia investigation?

One possibility is that McConnell is playing the long game. He knows that Flake will be gone in January, his Senate majority will grow in size by two, and then he will have the votes to resume confirming judges without having to deal with the Mueller issue.

ADVERTISEMENT

But a better question is why McConnell even opposes the special counsel protection bill in the first place. He has never given a logical answer for that.

Recently, when asked why he opposes the bill by reporters, McConnell said, “This is a solution in search of a problem. The president is not going to fire Robert Mueller … We have a lot of things to do to try to finish up this year without taking votes on things that are completely irrelevant to outcomes.” But this reasoning makes no sense. If he simply thought the bill was unnecessary, he wouldn’t need to be actively blocking it — and by allowing Flake to block votes on judges rather than take it up, McConnell is arguably wasting moretime in the lame duck session than he would by letting it go to the floor.

It is hard to say what his calculus is. Regardless, he has made his choice, and he will have to live with the consequences.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Brett Kavanaugh’s penis is back in the news’: Bill Maher breaks down the latest Supreme Court scandal

Published

on

HBO "Real Time" host Bill Maher broke down the latest scandal facing the United States Supreme Court.

"Brett Kavanaugh's penis is back in the news," Maher said. "The New York Times kind of tripped over his dick on this one."

Maher suggested the report reflects poorly on Kavanaugh's manhood.

"The problem is the woman, the victim, has no recollection of it happening -- which isn't really a ringing endorsement of his penis," Maher said.

Watch:

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘It’s all up to Republicans’: Columnist wonders when the GOP will stand up to Trump

Published

on

President Donald Trump's burgeoning scandal with Ukraine has one columnist wondering when Republicans will put country before party.

"I was going to write today about how House Democrats are handling the impeachment question. But the truth is, it’s largely irrelevant. As long as Republicans are united in opposition, President Donald Trump will stay in office," Bloomberg Opinion columnist Jonathan Bernstein wrote. "That’s not to say that there aren’t bad and worse choices for Democrats, but they’re not the ones who have the real decision to make."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Kellyanne Conway’s husband scorches Democrats for not impeaching Trump in blistering WaPo op-ed

Published

on

President Donald Trump has been "emboldened" by congressional inaction, according to a powerful new op-ed published Friday evening by The Washington Post.

The bipartisan appeal was written by prominent Republican attorney George Conway, who is the husband of White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, and Neal Katyal, who served as the acting Solicitor General during the Obama administration.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Investigate and Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image