Quantcast
Connect with us

Former federal prosecutor suspects Justice Department is leaking internal documents on Whitaker to reveal the truth about him

Published

on

During a Sunday discussion about special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, career prosecutor Cynthia Alksne explained that those in the Justice Department seem to be behind the leaks.

Mueller’s office has made news for the last year due to their lack of leaks, all while departments staff across the federal government have exposed President Donald Trump’s political appointees.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alksne began by explaining that it isn’t likely acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker will be able to block the Mueller report.

“I do not think it’s a wrap up I don’t think there’s any way Trump can block it even with Whitaker in place,” she said.

But it was her comments about the Justice Department that revealed the department wouldn’t allow Whitaker to block the release.

“The only place in Washington that doesn’t leak is Mueller’s office, but the Department of Justice does,” she continued. “We saw that this week when Whitaker tried to intimate to the public that he was not going to recuse himself and neglected to mention that the ethics people at the Department of Justice wanted him to recuse himself. Somebody leaked that, in fact, he hadn’t told the whole truth. There are people inside the Justice Department that want us to know what is going on with Matt Whitaker. I predict it does leak. If it doesn’t leak Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the House Intelligence Committee’s incoming chair, has already said he will subpoena it. Now, while we have to remove some things because there’s grand jury material in there, once it’s cleaned up and the grand jury material is gone, it will get to the House.”

Moreover, the American public isn’t likely to let the Justice Department or the president get away with not releasing the report. Trump has attacked the investigation non-stop since it began. He’s gone after the special counsel along with anyone who had the audacity to support the investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

An NPR/PBS NewsHour Marist Poll from early December showed 76 percent of Americans think that the report “should be released to the public in its entirety.” Those numbers go across both those Americans who support the probe and those who do not.

Watch her full commentary below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Why do we need camo in space’: Trump’s Space Force ridiculed for woodland camouflage uniforms

Published

on

On Friday, the United States Space Force released an image of their new uniforms on Twitter.

The image shows a Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) for a four-star general in a woodland camouflage pattern, with a matching camo nametape.

https://twitter.com/SpaceForceDoD/status/1218335200964464650

However, many people were confused as to why the Space Force would use uniforms designed to blend in on earth.

Here's some of what people were saying:

https://twitter.com/PostCultRev/status/1218351691021484032

Sorry for the question but why do we need camo in space?

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

BUSTED: National Archives caught doctoring exhibit to remove criticism of President Trump from women

Published

on

The National Archives were caught editing an artifact from the Trump administration to remove criticism of the president, according to a bombshell new report in The Washington Post.

The newspaper reported on a "large color photograph" at the National Archives exhibit marking the centennial of women's suffrage.

"The 49-by-69-inch photograph is a powerful display. Viewed from one perspective, it shows the 2017 march. Viewed from another angle, it shifts to show a 1913 black-and-white image of a women’s suffrage march also on Pennsylvania Avenue. The display links momentous demonstrations for women’s rights more than a century apart on the same stretch of pavement. But a closer look reveals a different story," the newspaper noted.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Dershowitz is running a ‘bizarro defense’ of Trump: Harvard Law colleague says ‘Alan is just completely wacko’

Published

on

Two of the most famous names associated with Harvard Law School had competing appearances on MSNBC on Friday.

It began when Alan Dershowitz, a professor emeritus, was interviewed MSNBC chief legal correspondent Ari Melber about his new role officially representing President Donald Trump during the Senate impeachment trial.

Dershowitz claimed that neither abuse of power nor obstruction of Congress count as "high crimes" under the constitution.

Professor Alan Dershowitz, who has also been associated with Harvard Law for five decades, was asked about Dershowitz's argument during an interview with Chris Hayes.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image