Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Let’s watch Jeanine Pirro’: Nicolle Wallace ridicules Fox News with $500 bet they won’t repeat Flynn judge commentary

Published

on

Composite image, Fox News personality Jeanine Pirro and MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace (screengrabs).

MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace laid down a bold dare for Fox News on Tuesday — replay the same clip of Jeanine Pirro on Michael Flynn that has been brutally mocked.

The challenge was issued after the Fox News personality broadcast a weekend rant speculating that Judge Emmett Sullivan would toss out Mike Flynn’s guilty plea.

Instead of tossing out the guilty plea, Judge Sullivan lectured Flynn for selling out America.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jonathan Lemire, White House reporter for the Associated Press, noted that White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was pressed on the Fox News argument on Tuesday.

“She was asked about what we heard over the weekend from Fox News, from Judge Jeanine Pirro and others, who have suggested this sort of conspiracy that Flynn was railroaded by the FBI agents — pressed into this. They feel like that would come out today and perhaps be an argument they can use to undermine the [Robert] Mueller probe,” Lemire noted. “Of course, none of that did transpire today, despite Sarah in a morning interview suggesting she, again, thought Flynn had gotten a raw deal.”

“She still did not walk back any of the president’s praise of Flynn, suggesting it was appropriate for him to still consider him a good man because of the crimes that he’s alleged to have committed, did not have anything to do with him,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I have that,” Wallace said of the Fox News clip. Words you’ve never heard on “Deadline: White House” — “Should we watch Jeanine Pirro?” Wallace joked.

“On Tuesdays, the parties will appear again before Judge Emmett Sullivan — a jurist unafraid of the swamp, a judge who has a track record of calling out prosecutorial misconduct, a man who does not tolerate injustice or abuse of power,” Pirro said in the clip. “Judge Sullivan can throw out this guilty plea if he concludes the FBI intentionally interfered with their target, Flynn’s constitutional right to counsel.”

After playing the clip, Wallace issued her challenge for Fox News.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I will donate $500 to charity if that clip of Jeanine Pirro airs on Fox News in primetime,” she dared.

Watch:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

That was no debate — it was a brawl

Published

on

Do we really have to pick a debate winner in a brawl? Do the rules matter?

Didn’t we know ahead of time that Donald Trump would slash viciously and personally and pretend that he is an outsider to Washington and that Joe Biden would try to look presidential,  mostly stick to his message while wryly noting that Trump was lying once again? If there was a substantive question or response that was a surprise, it slipped by me.

It may have been important to election prospects, but as a debate, it was a pretty sad commentary on our times. And yes, the fact-checking industry was hard at work (yes, Mr. President, there are 100 million Americans with health pre-conditions.)

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Here are 5 stunning moments from Biden and Trump’s first debate

Published

on

President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden faced off for the first time Tuesday night in the inaugural presidential debate of the 2020 general election.

It was a catastrophe. Trump was belligerent, mendacious, and overbearing, refusing to let Biden answer questions most of the time without interruption. Biden managed to get in several good moments, but he was often bulled over by the president's bluster and was unable to make a complete argument.

But Trump didn't really seem to get the better of Biden. By being so aggressive, he came off desperate, dishonest, and out of control. It was not a good look for a sitting president. And it completely undermined the supposed point of the debate: informing voters about the issues. Instead, it showcased the candidates' respective personalities, at least to some degree. While unpleasant, it may have been informative in its own way.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump blasted for ‘avalanche of lying’ in brutal takedown by CNN fact-checker

Published

on

CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale provided a brutal dose of reality after President Donald Trump constantly mislead Americans with his false claims during the first 2020 general election presidential debate.

CNN's Wolf Blitzer introduced Dale by recapping that, in his opinion, "clearly this debate was an embarrassment for the United States of America -- a clear embarrassment."

"How much was fact?" Blitzer asked. "How much was false?"

"Well, it depended Wolf on who we were listening to," Dale replied.

"I think it's important for us as journalists to say when both sides are not alike -- and they were not alike tonight," he explained.

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE