Quantcast
Connect with us

Fox News goes after newly-elected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s socialist agenda

Published

on

Ainsley Earhardt, the co-host of President Donald Trump’s favorite morning show falsely claimed to New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin and her “Fox & Friends” viewers that newly-elected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the youngest woman ever elected to the U.S. Congress, wants to “tax 70 percent of your paycheck.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Monday, on “Fox & Friends,” Earhardt asked Goodwin why he thinks Ocasio-Cortez has such wide support within the Democratic Party. “When you hear they’re going to tax 70 percent of your paycheck – if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gets her way – how do they have so much support?” she asked Goodwin.

Goodwin responded by saying that “young people today are not being educated properly in schools” and “don’t know the history of our country.” “They don’t know the history of other countries,” he added. “They don’t understand economics.”

“She’s charming and delightful in many ways,” Goodwin said of Ocasio-Cortez. “She got an economics degree from Boston University, and she clearly doesn’t understand how the unemployment rate works. She said that it’s low, because so many people have two jobs. Now, how do you get an economics degree from a major college and not understand that that’s not how the unemployment rate works? How is that possible?”

However, Ocasio-Cortez did not propose taking 70 percent on the average American’s income. In an interview with Anderson Cooper, which aired last week on “60 Minutes,” the freshman congresswoman argued that high tax rates on the super-rich could help fund the “Green New Deal” — an ambitious plan to combat the threat of climate change.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 29-year-old Democratic socialist said the “Green New Deal,” which aims to eliminate carbon emissions within 12 years, is “going to require a lot of rapid change that we don’t even conceive as possible right now.”

“What is the problem with trying to push our technological capacities to the furthest extent possible?” Ocasio-Cortez asked.

To pay for the deal, Ocasio-Cortez pointed to the progressive tax rate system in the 1960s, proposing the idea of tax of tax rates as high as 70 percent on the super-rich.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You know, you look at our tax rates back in the ’60s. And when you have a progressive tax rate system, your tax rate . . . let’s say, from zero to $75,000, may be ten percent or 15 percent, et cetera,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “But once you get to, like, the tippy tops, on your ten-millionth dollar, sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60 or 70 percent.”

“That doesn’t mean all $10 million are taxed at an extremely high rate,” she clarified. “But it means that, as you climb up this ladder, you should be contributing more.”

Cooper asked if she was proposing a “radical agenda, compared to the way politics is done right now.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think that it only has ever been radicals that have changed this country,” Ocasio-Cortez replied. “Abraham Lincoln made the radical decision to sign the Emancipation Proclamation. Franklin Delano Roosevelt made the radical decision to embark on establishing programs like Social Security. That is radical.”

Asked if she calls herself a “radical,” Ocasio-Cortez said, “If that’s what radical means, call me a radical.”

In another part of the interview, Cooper asked Ocasio-Cortez about her Democratic socialist convictions: “When people hear the word socialism, they think Soviet Union, Cuba, Venezuela. Is that what you have in mind?”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Of course not. What we have in mind — and what of my — and my policies most closely resemble what we see in the U.K., in Norway, in Finland, in Sweden,” Ocasio-Cortez replied.

Ocasio-Cortez’s socialist policies also came under scrutiny Monday on FoxNews.com, where the conservative writer Michael Knowles called the freshman congresswoman “frequently-wrong but never-in-doubt” in an opinion piece titled, “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the voice of an ignorant generation.”

“Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s ignorance of economics and foreign affairs typifies her generation. Despite holding expensive degrees in both Economics and International Relations from Boston University, Ocasio-Cortez threw up her hands in exasperation during an interview on Margaret Hoover’s ‘Firing Line’ program, laughing, ‘I’m not the expert on geopolitics,'” Knowles wrote. “Fortunately for her, in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king; and among a blithely ignorant generation, the lightly educated activist is congresswoman.”

“Socialism is an economic disease born of envy and ignorance. Unfortunately both abound in our present politics. The sickness has found an attractive spokeswoman—perhaps, sadly, the voice of her generation,” Knowles concluded.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joseph Lieberman, a former Democratic vice presidential candidate and Connecticut senator (first Democratic then independent) who wrote a Wall Street Journal editorial criticizing Ocasio-Cortez last month, told Salon’s Matthew Rozsa why the antipathy toward Ocasio-Cortez from the right is so strong.

“She challenges a lot of policy assumptions that are held dear on the right in American politics, including the market economy, the limits on government spending, involvement in internationalist foreign policy including support for Israel,” Lieberman said. He added that “the other thing going on” is how Republicans seem to believe that “the publicity she’s getting is ultimately a vulnerability for the Democratic Party in the midterm elections . . . if she can be made the face of the Democratic Party.”

Ocasio-Cortez has emerged as a national firebrand, in the process capturing the attention of Americans of all political stripes. She was sworn into the House of Representatives, as Democrats reclaimed control of the lower chamber. During the Democratic primary in June, the political novice unseated incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley, who at the time was the fourth highest-ranking Democrat in the House. Ocasio-Cortez is a self-identified Democratic Socialist and supports universal health care, tuition-free public universities and criminal justice reform.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

A veteran teacher explains why Trump is incapable of learning

Published

on

While dyslexia has been mentioned now and then as one of the reasons Donald Trump is so ignorant of what it takes to govern in a free society, I want to explore it as foundational to his inability to learn and grow while in office—and also as a way to link disparate troubling elements in his makeup.

Continue Reading

Facebook

White House pulls new FEMA nominee for barroom brawl — but not for his boss’ bribery

Published

on

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow began her Wednesday show detailing that Jeff Byard, President Donald Trump's nominee to lead FEMA, has withdrawn his name from nomination because of an "altercation" previously reported.

Already Trump's FEMA is having problems because of the lead FEMA officials being named in serious bribery scandals. Byard's boss, in particular, is under a 10-count indictment. To make matters worse, a former deputy is also under indictment, but for a completely different case involving a 2013 Navy scandal.

"Any mystery around that part of the guy’s past would have been cleared up this past year in August when he was indicted by a federal grand jury for his alleged involvement in that Navy bribery scheme," Maddow reported. "He was arrested thereafter."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Right-wing activists call on Mitch McConnell to stop blocking election security bills

Published

on

On Wednesday, CNN reported that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is facing renewed pressure to take up election security legislation, from a pair of unlikely sources: Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist, and FreedomWorks President Adam Brandon.

Norquist — who once famously said that he wanted to slash government to a size where he could "drown it in a bathtub" — called for hand-marked paper ballots, and urged Congress to pass something similar to the bipartisan Secure Elections Act, which would have given states incentives to switch to secure voting methods and promoted data-sharing to identify threats. The measure was first introduced in 2017 by Sens. Kamala Harris (D-CA), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), James Lankford (D-OK), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), but never came to a vote.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image