Quantcast
Connect with us

Michael Avenatti explains why he believes Kamala Harris is a high-risk candidate

Avenatti says Kamala Harris may have damaging legal cases in her past, and she’d “better get out in front” of them

Published

on

Michael Avenatti — the lawyer best known for representing porn star Stormy Daniels, who has said she was paid off by Donald Trump’s presidential campaign to stay quiet about their alleged affair — is now issuing warnings about Sen. Kamala Harris, who is likely to be one of the leading contenders for the 2020 Democratic nomination. He apparently believes that Harris’ past as a prosecutor in San Francisco, and then as California attorney general, could come back to hurt her.

I contacted Avenatti to figure out what he was implying, and whether he was referring to anything specific in Harris’ background. “A lot of this is drawn upon my seven to eight years of extensive experience conducting opposition research across the country back in the ’90s,” Avenatti told Salon. “I worked on over 150 campaigns in 42 states — Senate races, gubernatorial races, etc. — and whenever we were running against a prosecutor, we were generally elated, because every prosecutor has at least one if not many plea deals that have gone bad.”

“Plea bargains are a routine part of the system,” Avenatti continued — a fact illustrated by Donald Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen, who has admitted to paying off Avenatti’s client, Stormy Daniels, on Trump’s behalf. “But often defendants turn around and commit violent crimes following a plea deal that either diminished the amount of time they spent in prison or placed them on probation,” Avenatti said. “Due to the degree of recidivism in the United States, this is very common.

“It is easy to exploit a situation like that in the political arena, and especially at this level, when running for the presidency of the United States. The likelihood of journalists and/or opponents — whether they be in the primary or otherwise — digging into her prosecutorial background and locating such a plea deal gone wrong is extremely high.”

Avenatti isn’t the first prominent commentator to draw attention to Harris’ law enforcement background. He may well be the first to compare her to Michael Dukakis, the 1988 Democratic nominee, whose candidacy was damaged by the case of Willie Horton, a man furloughed from prison when Dukakis was governor of Massachusetts who then committed a violent crime.

ADVERTISEMENT

So far, most of the criticisms of Harris’ prosecutorial background have come from the left, including accusations that she sought to uphold wrongful convictions, opposed efforts at police reform, supported the death penalty, resisted marijuana legalization and tried to prosecute parents of truant children. Avenatti said he had not studied those controversies and that his tweets did not refer to any specific cases of “deals that went awry.”

“But I would be surprised if there are not at least a few because of the nature of the job that prosecutors do,” Avenatti said, offering a hypothetical example:

“If she is aware, for instance, of a situation where she agreed to a plea deal for a defendant and that defendant turned around and committed a violent crime — like a rape or a murder or something of that nature — she better get out in front of that,” Avenatti said. “Because if she thinks that that will not surface in this environment, she is sadly mistaken.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The only way to avoid her political opponents using such a deal against her, Avenatti argued, would be for Harris to acknowledge those mistakes now. “For the people that say ‘No, she must not have anything of this nature in her background because she ran for the U.S. Senate and attorney general and it would have come out by now,’ that’s ridiculous. The level of scrutiny that anyone undergoes when they throw their hat in the ring for the U.S. presidency is exponentially greater — 100 times or more — than anything they faced prior to that.”


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Bond is dead’: White dudes flip out over casting of a black woman as next Agent 007

Published

on

On Monday, the Daily Beast reported that the new 007 -- the special agent in the James Bond series -- will be portrayed by the black actress Lashana Lynch.

The announcement set off predictably racist and sexist reactions.

Perhaps the most prominent right-winger to voice his displeasure was Ben Shapiro, who complained that it didn't make sense for Bond to be a woman because of the character's signature seduction moves.

"Bond is about the guns and the girls," Shapiro said, noting that a woman in a seductive role was not realistic.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

REVEALED: The government just ‘dramatically’ expanded its investigation of Jeffrey Epstein

Published

on

Federal investigators have been able to “dramatically expand” their investigation into financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as prosecutors bring sex trafficking charges against him, Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller said in court on Monday.

The government revealed the expansion of the case at the day’s bail hearing. In searching the defendant’s house, investigators found an old passport with Epstein picture and a fake name that listed Saudi Arabia as the location of his residence, the prosecutor said.

The judge was surprised at this revelation, NBC News reported, asking the attorney, “Say again?”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Will Hurd becomes first GOP lawmaker to condemn Trump’s ‘racist and xenophobic’ attacks on Dems

Published

on

Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) on Monday became the first Republican lawmaker to unequivocally condemn President Donald Trump's racist attacks against four Democratic lawmakers.

When asked by CNN's Christiane Amanpour about Trump's weekend tweets, in which he told Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) to “go back” to their countries despite the fact that all four are American citizens, Hurd did not hold back on repudiating the president's statements.

"Those tweets are racist, and xenophobic," he said. "They’re also inaccurate. The four women he’s referring to are actually citizens of the United States."

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

close-image