Quantcast
Connect with us

Wall Street nervous as progressive Democrats take over the House finance committee

Published

on

Wall Street is bunkering down for a wave of intense scrutiny as a group of progressive Democrats, including social media star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have joined a powerful House of Representatives committee overseeing banking activities.

“It’s a huge victory,” said Ocasio-Cortez, at 29 the youngest member of Congress and a self-described socialist — a word that shocks conservatives, who brandish it as a dire threat.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I cannot stress how important this moment is. Dems are putting members who rejected corporate campaign money on a committee overseeing Wall St.,” she tweeted.

Ocasio-Cortez, often referred to by her initials AOC, will bring public attention to the ordinarily drab committee via her strong social media presence that includes 2.5 million followers on Twitter.

Wall Street is trying to figure out the goals of the Democrats, now in charge of the House of Representatives after eight years of control by President Donald Trump’s Republicans.

While the Senate remains in Republican hands and ready to block dramatic changes, Democratic control of the House promises at least to make life difficult for bankers, with tighter industry oversight and lengthy public hearings.

The symbolism is already striking.

The panel is headed by Maxine Waters, 80, a regular target of Trump’s barbs who is the first woman and the first African American to head the committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Waters has warned the financial sector that the days of banking deregulation and lax oversight are over.

– ‘Wall Street running amok’ –

In her first speech as committee chairwoman on January 16 she said the 2008 financial crisis “was a result of Wall Street running amok, with abusive institutions peddling toxic products… with no agency responsible for prioritizing consumer protection.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ultimately, the economy was sent tumbling into the abyss,” she said.

“Our fear,” a banking source told AFP, “is that she (Waters) will reinforce oversight of big banks.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The source expects to see “more CEO hearings in Congress” with the Democrats in charge.

Half of the new committee members belong to the Progressive Caucus, the left wing of the Democratic party.

Several made a splash when they ran for office in the November 2018 election.

ADVERTISEMENT

They include Ayanna Pressley, the first African American congresswoman from Massachusetts, and Rashida Tlaib, the first Palestinian American and one of the two first female Muslim lawmakers in Washington.

– Tighter banking oversight –

The newcomers favor tighter banking oversight, but also promise to fight for easier access to credit, more industry diversity, and against housing discrimination.

“I’m looking forward to digging into the student loan crisis, examining for-profit prisons/ICE detention, and exploring the development of public & postal banking. To start,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted.

“Public banking” are two words that send shivers down the spine of Wall Street.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nevertheless, “Cortez won’t set the agenda of the committee, Chairwoman Walters will,” a second banking source said.

“We have a lot of differences with her (Waters) but she’s been in that committee for 30 years. We know her, she knows us,” the source said. “There are bipartisan issues we can work on.”

The alliance of progressive Democrats extends into the Senate, where they can count on support from Elizabeth Warren, who has announced her interest in running for president in 2020.

Even though she is confined to the opposition, the 69 year-old senator can make bankers and government officials squirm with tough questions from her perch on the Senate finance committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With Republicans in control of the Senate, Waters’ best hope for the next two years is to keep financial issues in the limelight in the hope they influence the election next year,” wrote FTN analyst Chris Low.

Having Ocasio-Cortez on the committee “will bolster that goal,” he said.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

‘There needs to be a prosecution’ of cop who killed George Floyd: CNN guest says ‘call it what it is’

Published

on

On CNN Wednesday, criminal defense attorney Joey Jackson walked through why the Minneapolis police officer responsible for George Floyd's suffocation death must be prosecuted.

"Bottom line, question here from looking at this, should the officer face charges?" asked host Erin Burnett.

"Erin, I don't think there is any question about that, and I think if you look at it, under any reasonable measure there needs to be a prosecution," said Jackson. "You know, when you look at issues of excessive force — and I know this comes with a lot of emotion, and it should because of the blatant nature of what occurred. But if you even look at it legally and forget about the emotion, you look and you see, was there an imminent fear that the officer was facing when he had his knee in the neck of Mr. Floyd? And the answer is resoundingly no. You look at the force he used, that is the officer, and you say is it proportionate to whatever threat was posed? The answer is no, you don't see any threat. You see a person detained and really not resisting at all."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Police clash with George Floyd protesters in Minneapolis for second straight day

Published

on

On Wednesday, protests against the police killing of George Floyd continued — and once again, police and demonstrators clashed, with authorities using chemical agents to attempt to deter the crowds.

Protestors move further back into street after police shoot some kind of deterrent pic.twitter.com/yrvqziOMbD

— christine nguyen (@xinewin) May 27, 2020

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Texas Supreme Court triggers outrage by denying mail-in ballots to at-risk voters: ‘Brazen and corrupt’

Published

on

On Wednesday, the GOP-dominated Supreme Court of Texas ruled that voters cannot claim risk of coronavirus infection as a "disability" under Texas' absentee ballot eligibility law.

The decision triggered outrage immediately on social media, with some commenters noting that the justices themselves issued this decision remotely to keep themselves safe. Others noted that four of the justices themselves are up for re-election, and thus their own candidacies stand to be affected by the ruling.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image