Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) railed against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Friday, during a House Judiciary hearing with acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker.
“Why did Rod Rosenstein send a memo to Bob Mueller in 2017 concerning the scope of the special counsel investigation?” Jordan asked Whitaker.
“Congressman, thank you for that question and I know this is of great interest to you and I hope we can have a discussion about this today. The special counsel regulations require a scoping of the special counsel’s investigation that identifies the subject and the targets of the investigation, so I am certain that it would have identified the scope of the investigation pursuant to the special counsel’s — ” Whitaker replied, before being cut off.
“My question is not — I’ll get to that. My question is why. Because it was two and a half months after the special counsel was formed. So let’s go back to the beginning document which you told the chairman earlier you are completely briefed on the special counsel investigation,” Jordan said.
“This is a one-page document. Order 3915-2017 says this. The special counsel is authorized to conduct the special investigation including any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation. That’s pretty broad. Would you agree?”
“Yes, and in my mind is consistent with other appointments of special counsels,” Whitaker responded.
“That’s fine. It may be too broad, but as broad as you can get, one page ordered, go do your investigation and anything that arises out of it, you can investigate it as well. But then two and a half months later, we get this three-page memo from Rod Rosenstein, acting attorney general to Robert Mueller, special counsel, title says, scope of the investigation definition of authority,” Jordan shot back.
“This is what confuses me,” he continued. “Because in this memo that only Mr. Mueller and my guess is you and Mr. Rosenstein and a few people at the Justice Department have seen, most of it is blacked out, in this memo it says this: The following allegations were within the scope of the investigation at the time of your appointment and are within the scope of the order. If that’s true, why do you have to say it? If you could do it all along, why do you have to put it in a memo?”
Whitaker tried to explain that because of Session’s recusal from the investigation, he was essential recused as well.
“What really troubles me, Mr. Whitaker, right after that statement following allegations were within the scope of the investigation at the time of your appointment and within the scope of the order. Right after that, you know what happens? Everything is redacted. Look at this. The whole darn thing. So if you could do it all along and you have to send a memo to him two and a half months later, and then you redact everything after it. You know what’s under the redactions, Mr. Whitaker?” Jordan asked.
Whitaker admitted he knew what was under the redactions, and said it included names. Jordan asked if the memo provided the authority to investigate specific Americans, but Whitaker did not provide a clear answer.
“In this country we don’t investigate people, we investigate crimes, and if there are specific American citizens’ names in this redacted — I asked Mr. Rosenstein to see this and he got all mad and huffy in his office and wouldn’t show it to me,” Jordan said.
Watch video below:
WATCH: Civil rights icon John Lewis drops the hammer on Trump — and has no qualms about calling his remarks racist
On Tuesday, the fallout continued from remarks President Trump made telling four freshman congresswomen -- and women of color -- that they should go back to their own countries.
While some prominent Republicans criticized the president, they stopped short of calling his comments racist.
MSNBC reported Tuesday that Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) -- a civil rights icon -- deemed Trump's remarks racist.
"This is not any, any way for the president of the United States of America to be attacking to be saying what he's saying about these young women," Lewis said.
"It's just dead wrong. We must use everything in a nonviolent way to say that it's wrong."
Trump believes white nationalism is a winning strategy — because Fox News tells him so
Donald Trump thinks white nationalism is going to win him the 2020 election. This much is clear. Trump's racist Twitter rant on Sunday — in which he suggested that four nonwhite congresswomen, three of whom were born in the United States, are "originally" from somewhere else and should therefore "go back" — might have seemed at first like a spontaneous eruption of racist rage from the simmering bigot in the White House.
Soon, however, it became clear that this was strategic. Trump thinks it's a winning move to echo the claims of David Duke and other white nationalists who believe the United States is for white people. He justified his racism by saying that "many people agree with me," and by continuing to rave on Twitter about how the real purveyors of "racist hatred" are those who look askance at his embracing the rhetoric of Stormfront and the KKK.
‘White supremacy is a hell of a drug’: columnist explains the GOP’s garbled response to Trump
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump addressed comments he'd made telling four freshman congresswomen -- all American citizens and women of color -- to go back to their countries.
The comments set off a furor that the president was being outwardly racist.
“It's up to them. They can do what they want. They can leave, they can stay, but they should love our country,” the president told reporters Tuesday when he was asked about his remarks.
On CNN Tuesday, New York Times columnist Wajahat Ali explained how Donald Trump's comments -- and his Republican counterparts' refusal to call them racist -- is rooted in a dangerous white supremacy, or terror at the "browning of America."