A long-running legal battle over the house where Adolf Hitler was born erupted again on Tuesday when the Austrian government appealed against the amount of compensation it has been ordered to pay for seizing the property.
Last month, a regional court ruled that the state should pay the house’s former owner, Gerlinde Pommer, 1.5 million euros ($1.7 million) in compensation, instead of the 310,000 euros she had originally been offered.
According to Austrian media reports, the court decided on the higher sum to take into account the building’s historical significance.
But the Austrian Financial Procurator’s Office, which represents the government in legal matters, argued that the sum was too high because it did not take into account the rent the state had already paid for the property prior to its seizure, nor the costs of the building’s upkeep.
Hitler was born in the yellow corner house in the northern town of Braunau on April 20, 1889 and Pommer’s family owned it for nearly a century.
The government took control of the dilapidated building in December 2016 after years of legal wrangling with Pommer.
It wanted to prevent the premises from becoming a neo-Nazi shrine.
Wolfgang Peschorn of the procurator’s office said Tuesday the state was not contesting a compensation payment per se.
Nevertheless, “the Republic of Austria has an obligation towards taxpayers to ensure that the amount of compensation is verified by independent courts”, he said.
According to the state, the current market price of the property — set by a court-appointed expert at 810,000 euros excluding any rental income — would constitute an appropriate amount of compensation.
Pommer had been renting the 800-square-metre (8,600-square-feet) property — which also has several garages and parking spaces located behind the main building — to the interior ministry since the 1970s.
The government paid around 4,800 euros a month in rent and used it as a centre for people with disabilities.
But the agreement fell apart in 2011 when Pommer refused to carry out essential renovation work and also refused to sell it.
Since then, the building has lain empty.
At one point, the interior ministry was pushing to have it torn down but the plans ran into angry resistance from other politicians and historians.
In June 2017, Austria’s highest court, the Constitutional Court, ruled in favour of its expropriation.
Although Hitler only spent a short time at the property, it continues to draw Nazi sympathisers from around the world.
Every year on Hitler’s birthday, anti-fascist protesters also organise a rally outside the building.
‘Expect the worst’ as Trump doubles down on racist rhetoric to rile up his base: columnist
In a column for the Daily Beast, commentator and Sirius radio host Dean Obeidallah claims that all signs point to Donald Trump doubling down on racist rhetoric in an effort to rally his base as his internal polling shows him losing the key states that propelled him to the White House.
As Trump officially launches his re-election bid in Orlando on Tuesday night, Obeidallah notes Trump is falling back on what helped him appeal to disgruntled white workers in the Midwest and that he will likely ramp up attacks on undocumented immigrants -- including official actions.
‘Crimes against humanity’: Trump’s plan to deport ‘millions of illegal aliens’ – and separate parents from kids – draws outrage
President Donald Trump Monday night, less than 24 hours before he officially kicks off his re-election campaign, leaked details of a secret U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation that has been in the planning stages for months.
"Next week ICE will begin the process of removing the millions of illegal aliens who have illicitly found their way into the United States. They will be removed as fast as they come in," Trump tweeted at 9:20 PM ET.The Washington Post, three minutes before midnight, published its report based on the President's surprise tweet, revealing details of ICE's plan.
Here’s why ‘electability’ is a sucker’s bet in the 2020 primaries
Primary candidates fight hard to be seen as the person best positioned to beat an incumbent, but electability is only clear in hindsight. It isn’t quantifiable. Voters may work backwards, concluding that the candidate they personally prefer is also the most likely to win.
It’s a perception often grounded in lazy conventional wisdom. CBS reports that in key 2020 battleground states, “the belief that [Joe Biden]] could fare best against President Trump is currently propelling [him] in the early Democratic nomination race.” That belief is common despite the fact that the former Vice President is well known for being overly handsy and putting his foot in his mouth, has previously run two notably bad presidential campaigns and has been dogged by accusations of plagiarism dating back to law school.