Quantcast
Connect with us

US Senate weighs blocking Trump’s border emergency gambit

Published

on

 Congressional efforts to end President Donald Trump’s U.S.-Mexico border emergency declaration – an attempt by him to fund a border wall without approval from Congress – intensified on Thursday with the introduction of a bipartisan resolution to block him in the Senate.

The measure faces an uphill path to passage, but even a close vote in the chamber, controlled by his fellow Republicans, would be an embarrassment for Trump, who has failed over more than two years in office to persuade Congress to fund his wall.

ADVERTISEMENT

The dispute triggered the nation’s longest partial government shutdown in December-January, but that did not secure for Trump the $5.7 billion he has been demanding for his “great, great wall.”

Trump warned Republicans not to vote for the Senate resolution, saying in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, scheduled to air later on Thursday, that doing so would put them in “great jeopardy” politically with voters.

But Republican Senator Susan Collins and Democrat Tom Udall, sponsors of the bipartisan measure, said Congress needs to stand up for its power over making major decisions about spending taxpayer money and prevent Trump from circumventing the U.S. Constitution.

“The question before us is not whether to support or oppose the wall. It is not whether to support or oppose President Trump,” Collins declared on the Senate floor.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Rather, it is this: Do we want the executive branch, now or in the future, to hold the power that the founders deliberately entrusted to Congress?”

The resolution, identical to one already approved in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives, is also sponsored by two other senators: Republican Lisa Murkowski and Democrat Jeanne Shaheen. At its present level of support among senators, the measure would need the backing of at least one other Republican to win final Senate approval.

Even with that, however, it might ultimately be only a symbolic gesture of defiance because Trump has vowed to veto the resolution if it arrives on his desk, an action that would likely throw the fight over his emergency into the courts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump declared a national emergency on Feb. 15 after Congress declined to give him the $5.7 billion this year for his wall. The president said emergency powers would empower him to divert money from other accounts already approved by Congress, including military construction projects, to his wall.

Another Senate Republican, Lamar Alexander, argued Thursday that the president might avoid the clash with Congress if he would take the wall money from Pentagon accounts supporting counter-drug activities, instead of military construction.

Democrats argue that there is no actual border emergency and even if there were, Trump would still be overreaching.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The emergency law that President Trump invoked allows the military to redirect funds only if an emergency ‘requires use of the armed forces,’” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said at a hearing on Trump’s emergency. “This law is supposed to be used for actions such as building airfields or barracks to help our troops fight wars overseas,” he said.

The battle in Congress is the latest chapter in a long-running war between Trump and Democrats over border security and immigration policy. A coalition of 16 U.S. states led by California has sued Trump and top members of his administration to block his emergency declaration.

Moody’s Investors Service said on Thursday that Trump’s emergency declaration to build a border wall with Mexico means the U.S. territory of Guam could lose $750 million in military construction funds. This would be a “credit negative” because the U.S. military presence is one of the island’s dominant economic forces, the credit rating agency said in a statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

We’ve been living in ‘Game of Thrones’: Ex-CIA official blasts Trump for trying to crush whistleblower

Published

on

Angry Phil Mudd

On Thursday's edition of CNN's "The Situation Room," former CIA Counterterrorism Center Deputy Director Philip Mudd laid into President Donald Trump over his administration's efforts to quash a whistleblower with sensitive information on a promise Trump allegedly made to a foreign leader.

"You watch Game of Thrones on TV ... In the past 24 hours I feel look we've lived it," said Mudd. "Let me give you a take — I'm not sure of any side except the White House is wrong here. The inspector general says, I have something so egregious that I need to act on it, even if it includes activities of the White House. You have the acting DNI saying, that might be egregious activity but if it's White House personnel they don't work for me. I'm supposed to report on people who work for me and activities that might be inappropriate among my employees. Why am I responsible to reporting to Congress on somebody at the White House who is not my employee? I'm not sure anybody is wrong here. Both may be right. The person in the middle, I think, is the president and I think it's going to come out."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Public school employee pawned school-issued gun because he needed gas money: report

Published

on

A Florida man's need for gas money has landed him in jail.

"A former Pinellas County school guardian was arrested Wednesday and charged with five counts of false verification of ownership for pawning a handgun and other items issued to him by the Sheriff’s Office," the Tampa Bay Times reported Thursday.

It allegedly occurred multiple times.

"Detectives started looking into Erick Russell, 37, after he was arrested Sept. 5 on charges of domestic battery and false imprisonment," the newspaper reported. "They discovered Russell had pawned his sheriff’s-issued Glock 17 9 mm firearm and two magazines on three occasions during a one-month period from July 2 to Aug. 1."

Continue Reading
 

CNN

White House limiting staff access to Trump’s phone calls to prevent future whistleblowers: CNN

Published

on

On Thursday's edition of CNN's "The Situation Room," CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta reported that President Donald Trump has grown furious about the state of White House leaks, and his officials are working to keep as many people in the administration as possible shut out from his phone calls with foreign leaders — precisely to avoid situations like the exploding DNI whistleblower scandal.

"As for the whistleblower complaint that's being kept from Congress, a senior administration official tells CNN as these leaks from these calls have angered Trump, top officials in the West Wing began to limit who could listen in on these conversations so as to tighten the circle of people in the know and what the president has been discussing in some of these phone calls with foreign leaders," said Acosta.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image