Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump ex-aide Paul Manafort begs judge for leniency: ‘I am sorry for what I have done’

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, at a sentencing hearing before a federal U.S. judge on Wednesday, apologized for his actions and asked for leniency after getting a surprisingly light sentence of under four years in prison in a separate case last week.

Both cases arise from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 U.S. election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Manafort, the veteran Republican political consultant, was in federal court in Washington for sentencing on two conspiracy counts to which he pleaded guilty, related to money laundering, unregistered lobbying and witness tampering.

He showed a measure of remorse, unlike at his sentencing in his other case last Thursday.

“I am sorry for what I have done and for all the activities that have gotten us here today,” Manafort told the judge.

“This case has taken everything from me already – my properties, my cash, my life insurance, trust accounts for my children and grandchildren, and even more,” Manafort added.
Manafort, 69, asked U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson not to tack on any more prison time beyond the 47 months imposed by U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis in Virginia, where he was convicted by a jury of financial crimes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier in the hearing Jackson said she would not be swayed by last week’s sentence from Ellis, which was more than two decades below the upper limit of sentencing guidelines, prompting widespread criticism it was too light.

Jackson can give Manafort up to 10 years – five for each of the two conspiracy counts he pleaded guilty to last year to avoid a second trial that promised to reveal details about his work for pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine.

“What’s happening today is not and cannot be a review or a revision of a sentence that was imposed by another court,” the judge said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jackson ruled that Manafort should get a tougher sentence because he acted in a leadership role, directing others to participate in a crime, rejecting a defense argument that the sentencing enhancement should only apply to those who lead criminal organizations. But she said Manafort should get credit for acceptance of responsibility, because he pleaded guilty to the conduct at issue, even though she found he had lied to prosecutors in breach of a cooperation agreement.

The hearing was ongoing.

Manafort, who is suffering from a condition called gout, entered Jackson’s courtroom in a wheelchair wearing a dark suit and tie.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jackson’s sentence may mark the end of a nearly two-year legal battle between Manafort, who worked for Trump’s campaign for five months in 2016, and Mueller, who made exposing Manafort’s covert lobbying for pro-Kremlin politicians in Ukraine a centerpiece of his Russia probe.

Mueller’s team had not made a specific recommendation on Manafort’s sentencing. But prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said during the hearing that Manafort had engaged in an extensive cover-up that deceived the U.S. government and the American public, and continued to try to undermine the investigation even after he pleaded guilty.

“Paul Manafort’s upbringing, his education, his means, his opportunities could have led him to be a leading example for this country. At each juncture, though, Mr. Manafort chose to take a different path,” Weissmann said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He engaged in crime again and again. He has not learned a harsh lesson. He has served to undermine, not promote, American ideals,” Weissmann added.

It also comes as expectations grow that Mueller will soon wrap up his 22-month-old investigation by submitting a final report on his findings to Attorney General William Barr.

In the Washington case Manafort will be sentenced for conspiracy against the United States, which included a range of conduct from money laundering to unregistered lobbying, and a second count related to witness tampering.

In addition to its length, the focus will be on what portion of her sentence Jackson decides to run simultaneously with the 47 months imposed by Ellis, and what time, if any, she tacks on to run consecutively. In September Jackson warned Manafort, who turns 70 in April, that she had discretion on the matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Shanlon Wu, a Washington criminal defense attorney, said Jackson would have to weigh the fact that Manafort admitted his guilt, a mitigating factor, against her finding that he lied to prosecutors in breach of his plea deal, which freed prosecutors from any obligation to recommend leniency.

Wu predicted Jackson’s sentence would likely add about three years to his total prison time.

“I think she will run some of her time consecutively,” said Wu, who appeared before Jackson during a previous stint representing Manafort’s former business associate Rick Gates. “I would be surprised if she really threw the book at him.”

Manafort’s lawyers countered that their client should be given credit for admitting his guilt while also stressing that none of the Mueller’s charges related to the special counsel’s core mandate: collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ellis, who has been critical of the special counsel, echoed that sentiment at the hearing on Thursday, later prompting a misleading claim by Trump that the judge had exonerated his campaign.

Jackson has displayed a more even-handed stance, defense lawyers said. She allowed a disagreement over Manafort’s bail to carry on for months and only threw him in jail last June when he was indicted for an attempt to tamper with witnesses in the case.

“This a tale of two judges. Judge Ellis showed little restraint in his comments as well as his action,” said George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley. “Judge Jackson has shown considerable restraint.”

While many people believe Ellis’ sentence was “absurdly low,” Turley said he did not think Jackson would seek to rectify the matter, saying it was not “the providence of a second federal judge to correct an error by the first judge.”

Whatever Jackson’s ruling, the possibility of a presidential pardon – a prospect Trump has not ruled out — will likely continue to hang over the Manafort situation, lawyers said.

ADVERTISEMENT

A pardon might not, however, end Manafort’s legal troubles.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office is pursuing criminal charges against Manafort, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters last month. The charges, which originate from unpaid state taxes, could not be erased by a presidential pardon, which are only applicable to federal crimes.

Additional reporting by Nathan Layne and Karen Freifeld in New York; Editing by Will Dunham


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Donald Trump is mirroring the career path of Vladimir Putin: Scientology doc maker Alex Gibney

Published

on

According to the director of the "Going Clear," the definitive documentary on Scientology, the rise of both Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin neatly mirror each other in the way that they have propelled themselves into office by using media manipulation as their most potent weapon.

As part of a discussion with the Daily Beast about his latest work, Citizen K, a look at the life of Russian dissident Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Alex Gibney said Putin's career trajectory became a major part of his story -- and he noticed extraordinary parallels with Trump.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Princeton historian delivers the definitive smackdown of Trump’s ‘insulting’ lynching tweet

Published

on

Princeton University History Professor Kevin Kruse on Tuesday delivered a thorough takedown of President Donald Trump's claim that House Democrats' impeachment inquiry represents a "lynching."

In calling the tweet "twelve different kinds of bullsh*t," Kruse began by discussing the constitutional mechanics of the impeachment process in the House that only require a bare majority of lawmakers to favor in order to advance. Concerns about due process in impeachment only come into play in the Senate, where the president is ensured a fair trial and where two-thirds of lawmakers are needed to convict the president and remove him from office.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

CNN panel busts Trump for ‘grotesque’ lynching comment in effort to create chaos before key impeachment hearing

Published

on

Moments after Donald Trump fired off a tweet calling his impending impeachment a "lynching" a CNN panel hammered the president for making the horrific comparison -- but also pointed out that the president's use of the word was timed for a very specific reason.

Admitting a reluctance to read Trump's tweets on the air, "New Day" host Alisyn Camerota nonetheless, recited the president's tweet, reading, "So some day, if a Democrat becomes President and the Republicans win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can impeach the President, without due process or fairness or any legal rights,” Trump tweeted. “All Republicans must remember what they are witnessing here – a lynching. But we will WIN!” with obvious disgust.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image