Quantcast
Connect with us

Assange held in London jail ahead of long legal fight

Published

on

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange languished Friday in a British jail at the outset of a likely lengthy extradition battle following the dramatic end to his seven-year stay in Ecuador’s London embassy.

Within hours of police hauling him out of the embassy on Thursday, the 47-year-old Australian appeared in court for breaching his British bail conditions in 2012 and to face a subsequent US extradition request.

ADVERTISEMENT

A legal source familiar with the case told AFP that Assange was being held at Belmarsh prison in southeast London.

One of eight “high security” jails in England, it can also hold prisoners “requiring specific management arrangements because of their public and media profile”, according to a 2018 inspection report.

Assange was remanded in custody Thursday at a hearing in front of a London judge, who pronounced him guilty of disobeying his bail terms by fleeing to the embassy in June 2012.

He could receive up to a year in prison when sentenced at an as yet undetermined later date.

His separate extradition case on charges of computer hacking is set to be next heard by video-link at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on May 2.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, under British law the United States has until June 12 to submit full extradition papers.

Assange’s London lawyer Jennifer Robinson confirmed he would contest the long-feared attempt to try him there.

“He’s obviously going to fight extradition and fight it hard,” Robinson told BBC radio on Friday, adding she had visited her client in a court cell after the hearing when he thanked supporters and said: “I told you so.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“The bigger question is… why is the United States seeking his extradition over publishing truthful information.”

– Extradition ‘should be opposed’ –

ADVERTISEMENT

Assange sought asylum at Ecuador’s embassy in London’s chic Knightsbridge district after a British judge ruled he should be extradited to Sweden to face sexual assault allegations.

Inside the red-brick building he lived a sparse existence in a flat measuring 18 square metres (190 square feet) with just a bed, shower, computer, treadmill and microwave.

Britain spent £13.2 million up to 2015 on policing up to 2015, maintaining a 24-hour guard at the embassy’s doors in the first year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Relations with his Ecuadoran hosts gradually soured and new pro-US President Lenin Moreno on Thursday pulled his asylum and permitted British police to remove Assange.

Prime Minister Theresa May welcomed the arrest as showing “no one is above the law”.

But opposition Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, a leftist stalwart, called for the government to block the extradition.

“The extradition of Julian Assange to the US for exposing evidence of atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan should be opposed,” he said on Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

May’s comments prompted a furious reaction on Twitter from Assange’s mother, who lives in Australia.

She accused the British prime minister of “trying to divert attention away from her Brexit dog’s breakfast by cheering on the thuggish, brutal, unlawful arrest of my courageous, tortured multi-award winning journalist son”.

– Years-long extradition cases –

Legal experts said the case could be stuck in British courts for up to two years and, if appealed, potentially go all the way to the European Court of Justice.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The chances of him winning (against) extradition are low,” Ben Keith, a British barrister specialising in the field, told AFP. “We extradite most people to the US.”

Critics of the move, including WikiLeaks editor Kristinn Hrafnsson, have warned the US could add more charges once Assange is extradited.

But Keith said once they have filed their formal request within the next 65 days, American officials would be limited to those charges.

“There’s specific international extradition law protection that prevents you from charging someone with additional (offences),” he added.

Assange supporters, including fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, rallied outside Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Inside the courtrooom, judge Michael Snow described him as a “narcissist” and suggested he could consent to the extradition to “get on with your life”.

Previous comparable cases, involving accused hackers Lauri Love and Gary McKinnon, took between five and 10 years but eventually resulted in their extraditions to the US being blocked.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Canadian vaping study details danger from ‘popcorn lung’ chemical

Published

on

A 17-year-old Canadian nearly lost his lungs after five months of intensive vaping, but the ingredient suspected of doing the damage, diacetyl, is different from the substance US authorities blame for dozens of deaths.

The case, described Thursday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), deepens the mysteries surrounding e-cigarettes, which have grown so popular US President Donald Trump earlier this week backed away from a proposed ban on certain vaping flavors, fearing such a move could cost him votes.

Vaping has been blamed for 42 deaths in the United States since the past summer. Canada has been relatively spared, with only eight identified patients, and no deaths.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Democrat calls out Republican’s ‘epic mansplaining’ to Fiona Hill

Published

on

Democratic Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY) apologized to diplomat Dr. Fiona Hill after Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) used his time on the Intelligence Committee to "mansplain" his own political theories.

"Good afternoon, thank you for being here," Maloney began. "Dr. Hill, first of all I thought that was some epic mansplaining that you were forced to endure from my colleague Mr. Turner.

Turner spent his five minutes to speak filibustering and attacking Hill and then refused to allow her to respond. Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) then spoke with his own five-minute speech, not asking any questions. He then left the room.

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Furious GOP congressman erupts after Adam Schiff lets David Holmes answer questions

Published

on

Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) on Thursday grew furious with Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) after the House Intelligence Committee chairman insisted that he allow witness David Holmes to answer his question.

During a testy exchange with Holmes, Conaway got upset at the State Department official for reporting a call that he overheard between Trump and European Union ambassador Gordon Sondland while the two of them were at a restuarant in Kiev.

"Sir, I think it was Gordon Sondland who showed indiscretion by having that conversation over a public phone line," Holmes replied.

At this point, Conaway interjected and started talking over Holmes, and Schiff told him to let the witness finish his answer.

Continue Reading
 
 

Happy Holidays!

As a special thank you from all of us at Raw, we're offering Raw Story ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. Now 'til Dec. 31st.
Offer Expires In:
close-link