California congressman announces presidential bid on 'The Late Show' with Stephen Colbert
April 08, 2019
For customer support issues contact
support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to
corrections@rawstory.com.
Stories Chosen For You
Trump takes swing at 'fake news media' in non-apology over 'death and destruction' comment
March 27, 2023
Former President Donald Trump on Monday defended a controversial social media post described by some as a stochastic terrorist threat against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Trump on Thursday posted a photo on his Truth Social site showing the former president holding a baseball bat next to a photo of the Manhattan prosecutor in an all-caps post that includes a description of Bragg as a “SOROS BACKED ANIMAL.”
Trump may not have explicitly called for violence against the man leading an investigation into alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels, but the former president is getting close according to Kurt Braddock, an American University professor who studies extremism, Business Insider reports.
"Trump is doing what he has always done. He walks to the line of openly calling for violence and stops just before making overt directives," Braddock said.
"In many ways, the implications are the same. His supporters who are looking for an excuse to turn to violence will see this as his implicit approval."
During an appearance with Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Monday, Trump dismissed the notion that he intentionally promoted violence. He said the photo was taken to promote a bat that was “made in America.”
“They put up a picture of me. And you know when I was holding the baseball bat, it was at the White House. Make America buy America because they didn't want to buy America things,” Trump said of the since-removed post.
“And this is a company that makes baseball bats then they put next to that picture next to Alvin Bragg. I didn’t do it.”
Trump said his “death and destruction” comment wasn’t intended to be a threat but rather a warning of what could happen if Bragg pursues a “fake prosecution.”
RELATED: Is this pro-Trump lawyer lying? The National Enquirer's former chief may have the receipts
“I mean, I can't believe people that have never been positive to me or defended me that don't like me. They're on the other side of the world. These are people that said, ‘You can't do this prosecution, it will cause tremendous problems.’
“I didn't say to do something bad. I said I am afraid that people will do something because people are very angry about it.”
“Let me be clear,” Hannity asked Trump, “so you did not post the picture of you with a baseball bat in the oval office next to the picture with Bragg, somebody else did that?
“I posted a very positive article and whatever picture they put up, my people didn't put up the picture, I think the picture maybe was either in the article or it was put in the article later. But again, that was a baseball bat to promote made in America companies making America don't go to Japan to buy…” Trump said.
“But you know how it was interpreted?” Hannity interrupted.
“Because it's a fake news media. That's what they do … anything you say and they say the opposite.
The Democrats are genius at a few things. They're horrible at foreign relations. They are horrible at policy. They're horrible at everything. They're good at a number of things, though, misinformation, or disinformation depending on your definition, but both.”
ALSO IN THE NEWS: Murdaugh family member mysteriously buying up family heirlooms on auction
CONTINUE READING
Show less
David Pecker is a 'critical witness' who could get Trump charged with a 'second crime': former prosecutor
March 27, 2023
On Monday, prosecutors working for the Manhattan District Attorney's office called David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer, to give more evidence to the grand jury weighing an indictment against former President Donald Trump for bookkeeping fraud.
And that could prove decisive, former Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Dan Horowitz argued on MSNBC — not just for the expected financial indictment, but in bumping it up to a felony and possibly adding more charges.
"So there's no question that in a case like this, witnesses sometimes get called back," Horwitz told anchor Lawrence O'Donnell. "It's not unusual in a complex case to have a witness who, by media reports, testified at the beginning of this grand jury, to come back at some point to add additional details as the case has evolved in the grand jury."
"And there isn't any question, as you said in your lead-in, that David Pecker is a critical witness," continued Horwitz. "He's a critical witness because he could corroborate back up Michael Cohen. He's a critical witness because he sets up if the district attorney is looking for a falsifying business records charge, he sets up the second crime that is, you have to falsify a business record with intent to commit another crime. And in this case, that could very well be a violation of your state's election law."
RELATED: Is this pro-Trump lawyer lying? The National Enquirer's former chief may have the receipts
Above all, Horwitz said, "there isn't any question that Pecker, according to what's already been written and, and what, what the prosecutors in the federal case charged — there's no question that Bakar is a critical figure in setting up protecting then-candidate Trump from bad stories initially and then specifically with respect to Stormy Daniels.
"So it's very possible that also, as you alluded to in your lead-in, that perhaps there are some additional documents they want to ask Mr. Pecker questions about," added Horwitz. "But in my mind, there isn't any question that he's there to amplify the hook to New York State election law and backing up Michael Cohen."
Watch the segment below or at this link.
Dan Horwitz on why David Pecker is a "critical witness" in Trump case www.youtube.com
CONTINUE READING
Show less
WASHINGTON — Facing unforeseen challenges the likes of which the United States has never confronted will require a resurgence of American journalism and an informed electorate.
That’s according to Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), who delivered his remarks Monday at the Syracuse University Toner Prize dinner at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington, D.C. The Toner prizes are awarded for political reporting. The award is named after Robin Toner, the late New York Times political correspondent.
“I don't recall a period during my life when there are so many black swans flying around,” the Republican party’s 2012 presidential nominee said.
“Now, the resurgence of journalism, and with a more knowledgeable and informed electorate, wouldn't be so critical if this weren't such a critical time.”
Of particular concern to Romney are China’s emergence as a military superpower, entitlements, climate change and the potential of artificial intelligence to cause catastrophic harm.
“China is on track to pass us economically geopolitically, even militarily. And yet we cannot hide from that fact, and lull ourselves into complacency.
“The actual figure is a little frightening,” Romney said, noting that even though the United States vastly outspends the rest of the world on its military, only 15 percent of that money goes to equipment procurement, with the vast majority going to veterans’ salaries, housing and benefits.
“China is growing their navy, it’s going to be substantially larger than ours. So it's a much greater challenge than I think the immediacy has sunk into us.
He said interest payments alone on America’s exploding national debt will be $650 billion this year.
“Our total military budget is $750 billion,” Romney said.
“When you're spending almost as much on interest as you spend on national defense. You’ve got a problem," he continued. "Neither party is willing to discuss an approach to solving this problem with us by the way as you know, it all stems from the fact that our entitlements which are two-thirds of spending are going faster than our economy. But neither political party wants [to] even talk about doing anything about entitlements.”
Romney expressed concern that both parties are dropping the ball on climate change, too, noting many of his Republican colleagues are unserious about global warming.
As for the left?
“I'm afraid the Democratic Party on the other hand has proposed, if you will, virtue signaling baby steps that would have the combined effect of being expensive and ineffective," Romney said.
Romney also expressed concern about the potential impacts of artificial intelligence.
He pointed to a report that said “of the people who are developing AI on average, they believe there's a 10 percent chance the AI being developed will eliminate humanity.”
“You would think with something of that scale as a threat that Washington would be working to find ways to work with others around the world to make sure that something of that nature doesn't occur," Romney said.
That’s where journalists come in.
“So, if democracy dies in darkness, we're counting on you and those that are being honored tonight who have have shown us the way, to help shed the light of truth on our public electorate.”
Listen to audio of some of Romney's remarks below or at this link.
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Copyright © 2023 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections contact corrections@rawstory.com, for support contact support@rawstory.com.
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}