Quantcast
Connect with us

‘If you don’t impeach — I don’t get what this is for’: Obama administration lawyer

Published

on

The former Solicitor General to President Barack Obama doesn’t get why Democrats wouldn’t impeach President Donald Trump.

During special coverage by Ari Melber Sunday, Neal Katyal explained that without impeachment, this 22-month long investigation was essentially for nothing.

“So, I agree with the idea that there is a short-term political victory,” he said. “Barr did say two things that are crucial: They are on pages 1 and 2. Number one, Mueller says even if Trump were guilty as sin, I couldn’t indict him because of these two Justice Department opinions. And as such, I’m not going to potentially incriminate him in the report. So that’s number one. And number two he says if the evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes and was clear as day, then I will exonerate him. And Mueller does neither. As then as we’ll be talking about over the next couple of hours, the report paints a devastating picture of the president.”

He noted that he’s heard Republicans say that the public isn’t behind impeachment, but he suspects it’s because the Barr pre-spin press conference with the four-page memo caused a lot of confusion. As the actual report becomes available and the news spreads about it, Americans may very well change their tune.

“Now the public has this long report before it,” he noted. “And I think Mueller bet on the public. He bet on the faith of the public that they will read this report. They will look at it. They will look through these devastating details about what the president has done, and the president has gotten away with a lot of stuff for the last two years from Charlottesville to taxes to trade and lying and all that. Here you have people, witnesses, including the president’s staunch allies like his White House counsel, implicating the president in the commission of crimes. It will be much harder for him to dismiss. I think there is only one course of action for the Congress to take ultimately, and it is going to be to impeach this president.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Melber noted it was surprising to hear that coming out of Katyal, who is considered to be a voice for the “establishment.”

“I was just going to say, I mean, if, you know, the report and the devastating details in it are so strong that if you don’t impeach and don’t launch an investigation over this, I don’t know what it’s for at the end of the day,” he said. “Nixon wasn’t even close to what this report says.”

Watch his full take below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Arizona ‘museum fire’ balloons to over 300 acres — and they’re evacuating the area

Published

on

A massive fire has grown much faster than anticipated, just north of Flagstaff, Arizona. Brady Smith, Coconino County National Forest, told ABC15 that they have at least 200 staff on the ground and planes dropping fire retardant.

AZCentral reported that the fire located in the Dry Lake Hills.

Continue Reading

Facebook

WATCH: Trump apologist goes down in flames when he claims Democrats don’t get attacked like Trump

Published

on

Former White House advisor Matt Mowers went down in flames trying to claim Democrats call everyone a racist when they don't agree with them. He had to go back 15 years to find an example, but still never fully explained what the example was.

In a panel discussion with MSNBC's Kasie Hunt, Mowers employed the "what about" strategy, spinning the idea that Trump's racist remarks were justified because Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) used an anti-Semitic trope. To be fair, Omar apologized and met with community leaders and officials to better understand anti-Semitism. Trump can't even admit when he did something wrong, much less racist.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Congress should ask Mueller these specific questions about Trump’s involvement with Russia: Conservative columnist

Published

on

Conservative Never-Trump columnist Jennifer Rubin outlined the essential questions that Democrats should ask special counsel Robert Mueller in an op-ed for the Washington Post.

"Rather than engage in the normal scattershot questioning punctuated by speechifying, the House Judiciary Committee should assign its able attorney Norman Eisen to conduct the questioning," proposed Rubin. "Members could then follow up with additional questions.'

One question she proposed asking: "Mr. Mueller, the attorney general said you did not find 'collusion.' However, you did not look for collusion. Please explain what you looked for and how that differs from [Attorney General William] Barr’s assertion that you essentially cleared President Trump of collusion?"

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image