Quantcast
Connect with us

Here’s the biggest mystery the Mueller report left unanswered

Published

on

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on his investigation into President Donald Trump tied up many loose ends — but left another huge one hanging.

The Daily Beast reported Thursday evening that the question hanging over the report’s detailed descriptions of Trump campaign contacts with Russians is why those Russians were so interested in the campaign in the first place.

“Mueller reaffirmed the intelligence community’s conclusions that the Russian government directed an online campaign of hacking and trolling to help Donald Trump in 2016,” the Beast‘s Adam Rawnsley wrote. “What’s less clear are the intentions of the many Russians who reached out to the Trump campaign offline and whether they were well-connected covert emissaries of the Kremlin or just hucksters trying to latch onto the coattails of a potential president.”

It’s difficult to figure out the motives behind the Russian hangers-on “in part because many of them were a mirror image of their counterparts in Trump World: D-listers in their own political hierarchy for whom the line between state policy and personal gain is unclear,” Rawnsley observed.

The writer noted that although Oleg Deripaska and Konstantin Kilimnik — two of the Russians whose roles in the Trump-Russia saga have long been investigated by prosecutors and reporters alike — may have had nefarious intentions to pass along information to the Kremlin, not all the Russians mentioned in the report did.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rawnsley noted that when Mueller’s office charged Michael Cohen, he included a “tantalizing” detail about a mysterious person who promised “political synergy” and a meeting with Putin.

“Stripped of his anonymity, synergy man seems a far less impressive operator,” the writer mused. “Mueller’s final report identifies him as Dmitry Klokov, the director of public relations for a Russian electrical transmission company who had once been a spokesperson for a former Russian energy minister. If he could’ve set up a Putin meeting, he didn’t try very hard—Cohen dumped him after a few phone calls.”

Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer who was integral to the infamous Trump Tower meeting, is another question mark that may lead to a dead end.

ADVERTISEMENT

Though her links to Russian government sources were teased, her clients revealed that her “most pressing” priority was to get rid of sanctions against Russian individuals and companies.

“So was she representing her clients at that meeting or the broader interests of the Kremlin?” Rawnsley mused. “Mueller doesn’t say, but the bait she offered—unsupported allegations about money laundering she couldn’t connect to Hillary Clinton—was far short of tempting.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

FLASHBACK: Jeffrey Epstein accuser revealed there are tapes of famous men with underage girls

Published

on

A 2015 report is resurfacing on Raw Story as the Jeffrey Epstein trial begins and Washington and New York men fear being outed.

It appears that a series of QAnon Facebook groups and pro-Trump groups were the ones responsible for posting the story.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Fox News is so obsessed with Ocasio-Cortez they said her name three times as much as CNN or MSNBC

Published

on

It's clear that Fox News and other right-wing reporters are trying to create boogymen in Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. A new analysis by CNN media reporter Brian Stelter, revealed that the conservative network has said Ocasio-Cortez's name more than CNN and MSNBC combined.

"First, Ocasio-Cortez and her "Squad" mate Ilhan Omar have been talked about a lot more on Fox than on other cable news channels this year," Stelter wrote. "Second, the freshmen have been getting more attention on cable than seasoned leaders of the Democratic Party."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Congress should ask Mueller these specific questions about Trump’s involvement with Russia: Conservative columnist

Published

on

Conservative Never-Trump columnist Jennifer Rubin outlined the essential questions that Democrats should ask special counsel Robert Mueller in an op-ed for the Washington Post.

"Rather than engage in the normal scattershot questioning punctuated by speechifying, the House Judiciary Committee should assign its able attorney Norman Eisen to conduct the questioning," proposed Rubin. "Members could then follow up with additional questions.'

One question she proposed asking: "Mr. Mueller, the attorney general said you did not find 'collusion.' However, you did not look for collusion. Please explain what you looked for and how that differs from [Attorney General William] Barr’s assertion that you essentially cleared President Trump of collusion?"

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image