Quantcast
Connect with us

Mueller’s public testimony could blow the lid off of Trump’s denial of Russian collusion — and Bill Barr covering for him

Published

on

Congress is reportedly on the verge of locking down testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller on the details of the Russia investigation, although it appears that Mueller wants to speak behind closed doors.

On Friday, former Director of National Intelligence general counsel Robert S. Litt and Brookings Institution fellow Benjamin Wittes outlined just how important the testimony will be in an editorial for the Washington Post.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Given Mueller’s well-deserved reputation for reticence and strict adherence to the law, he is unlikely to be willing to provide a political spin on his report,” wrote Litt and Wittes. “But Mueller’s reputation for probity — previously unquestioned by Republicans and Democrats alike — is all the more reason he should testify, and why that testimony should be public rather than behind closed doors.”

Mueller’s testimony, they noted, would be able to definitively answer whether President Donald Trump and his allies are correct to characterize the result of his report as “no collusion, no obstruction”; what exactly Mueller meant when he wrote that he “did not establish” a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s campaign and the Russian government; and whether he found “substantial evidence of cooperation, shared objectives and contacts between Russian actors and the Trump campaign figures.”

Additionally, they said, Mueller’s testimony could clarify the behavior of Attorney General William Barr. For example, Mueller could answer whether Barr discussed the reports findings with him before making a determination, whether he agrees that the facts don’t support charging the president with obstruction of justice, whether he intended Barr to make that determination, and whether Barr was correct that Mueller’s determination was not solely a result of the Office of Legal Counsel’s policy against indicting a sitting president.

Mueller could also shed light on Trump and his allies’ grievances about FBI surveillance of the campaign, they noted. For instance, the special counsel could definitively explain the origins of the investigation, what role the “Steele dossier” played, and whether it is appropriate to characterize the civil servants working for his office as “angry Democrats” — which could potentially push back on right-wing conspiracy theories about the probe.

Lastly, they said, Mueller’s testimony could be instructive about how to handle threats of foreign election interference going forward. He could contextualize how big of a threat the operation he uncovered poses to American democracy, and outline steps that should be taken to ensure it never happens again.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When Mueller does testify, he can expect far more questions than we could list here,” Litt and Wittes concluded. “But it is vital for the public’s understanding, and in order to preserve the security of U.S. elections in the future, that it hear from Mueller on these and other matters. Congress has an important fact-finding role to play, and special counsel Mueller has an important part to play in assisting the legislature, consistent with the rules governing prosecutors and investigations of this scope and significance.”

You can read their list of Mueller questions here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

White House flack gets busted after claiming Trump ‘barely knows’ GOPer who took pardon offer to Assange

Published

on

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham claimed on Wednesday that President Donald Trump "barely knows" former Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), who has been linked to a possible pardon for Julian Assange.

At a pre-trial hearing earlier on Wednesday, Assange asserted that he had been offered a pardon in exchange for publicly denying that Russia hacked Democratic National Committee servers during the 2016 election campaign.

Rohrabacher admitted in 2017 that he had tried to broker a deal between Assange and the White House.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

WATCH: Fox News host grills WH spokesman on why Trump is ignoring Barr’s call to stop tweeting

Published

on

During an appearance on Fox News this Wednesday, White House deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley addressed reports of tension between President Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr over comments Barr made suggesting that he's fed up with Trump's tweeting. According to Gidley, the relationship between the two is strong.

Gidley was then pressed by America's Newsroom anchor Ed Henry on reports that Barr is considering resigning over Trump's tweets about the Roger Stone case.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Didn’t Trump want the death penalty for drug offenses?’: White House mocked for claim Blagojevich was freed to combat ‘aggressive sentencing’

Published

on

During an appearance on Fox News this Wednesday, White House deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley addressed President Trump's recent pardons and commutations, specifically the commutation of Rod Blagojevich, suggesting it was done in an effort to clamp down on "aggressive sentencing" by prosecutors.

"The fact is, the president is clearly against excessive sentencing," Gidley said. "Whether it's Rod Blagojevich or Alice Johnson, he's focused on making sure people who serve time in prison, who have rehabilitated, who show regret and show remorse, don't have to rot away in a jail cell their whole life."

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image