Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump just succeeded in weaponizing the Justice Department

Published

on

Attorney General Bill Barr directed Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham to investigate the origins of the Russia investigation, the New York Times reported Monday night.

The Times noted that this is the third Justice Department investigation of the investigation. A U.S. Attorney in Utah and Inspector General Michael Horowitz have also examined the probe. And under former Chair Devin Nunes, the House Intelligence Committee extensively pored over the probe for hints of wrongdoing, and while he found evidence that he was able to twist for partisan benefit, there was no sign of actual misconduct by the investigators.

ADVERTISEMENT

But whatever the new investigation finds, it certainly proves one thing: Trump has succeeded in turning the Justice Department into a political weapon.

Given the other probes, there’s clearly no need for an additional investigation. But Barr has proven that he is a down-the-line Trump partisan, and it’s clear that the president wanted the attorney general to go after the people who began an investigation of his campaign. (He’s never shown any similar sort of animosity to the Russians who actually broke the law and tried to corrupt his team ahead of the election.)

There seem to be two reasonable possibilities that led to the attorney general’s decision: Barr took his orders, either directly from Trump behind the scenes, or indirectly from Trump’s public comments about wanting the “origins” of the investigation examined, and launched the new probe for that reason. Or Trump knew exactly who he was getting when he picked Barr to be attorney general — someone who would see the Russia investigation’s very existence as an affront to a Republican president — and that’s why he chose him.

Either way, Trump has shown he has enough control over the department to go after his perceived enemies. This is even Trump’s explicit aim — he said last week that it would be fine for him to instruct Barr to investigate Joe Biden, a likely 2020 opponent.

“Certainly, it would be an appropriate thing to speak to him about, but I have not done that as of yet,” Trump said. “It could be a very big situation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The irony, of course, is that what Barr has been reported to do is exactly what he, Trump, and other Republicans accuse the Justice Department under President Barack Obama of doing: starting an investigation of an enemy for political reasons. But pointing out their hypocrisy will do little good — for the modern conservative movement, all that matters is who holds the levers of power.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

LIVE COVERAGE: Shooter opens fire at Pensacola Naval base — injuries reported

Published

on

A shooter opened fire Friday morning at a Naval base in the Florida panhandle.

The shooting was reported about 7:15 a.m. at Naval Air Station Pensacola, which employs more than 16,000 military personnel.

Baptist Hospital confirmed victims from the shooting were brought for treatment, although no additional information was available about the victims or their injuries.

The shooter was reported dead just before 9 a.m.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Here’s the exact moment Nancy Pelosi changed her mind on impeaching Trump

Published

on

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) spent much of 2019 trying to push Democrats away from impeaching President Donald Trump.

Even after special counsel Robert Mueller's report outlined multiple instances of potential obstruction of justice by the president, Pelosi remained reluctant to pursue what she believed would be an unproductive and divisive process.

However, the New York Times reports that Pelosi's mind was changed in an instant on September 21st when the Wall Street Journal broke the news that Trump had repeatedly pressed the Ukrainian government to investigate the family of former Vice President Joe Biden.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Giuliani walloped for claim Trump has constitutional duty to pressure Ukraine to probe Biden

Published

on

Rudy Giuliani claimed President Donald Trump had a constitutional obligation to carry out the Ukraine scheme, and was quickly drowned in mockery.

The president's personal attorney jumped to an unusual legal conclusion based on Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution to defend Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating Joe Biden -- which Giuliani is continuing to pursue this week in a visit to Kyiv.

"Presidential Legal Obligations 101," Giuliani tweeted. "Art 2, Sec. 3 of the US Constitution obligates the President to investigate and ask for investigations of corruption in countries we provide funds to. Who ever heard of a president being impeached for carrying out his constitutional mandate?"

Continue Reading